Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Which one of the following principles, if established, would determine that demolishing the houses was the right decision or instead would determine that the proposal advocated by the opponents of demolition should have been adopted? (A) When what to do about an abandoned neighborhood building is in dispute, the course of action that would result in the most housing for people who need it should be the one adopted unless the building is believed to pose a threat to neighborhood safety. (B) When there are two proposals for solving a neighborhood problem, and only one of them would preclude the possibility of trying the other approach if the first proves unsatisfactory, then the approach that does not foreclose the other possibility should be the one adopted. (C) If one of two proposals for renovating vacant neighborhood buildings requires government funding whereas the second does not, the second proposal should be the one adopted unless the necessary government funds have already been secured. (D) No plan for eliminating a neighborhood problem that requires demolishing basically sound houses should be carried out until all other possible alternatives have been thoroughly investigated. (E) No proposal for dealing with a threat to a neighborhood's safety should be adopted merely because a majority of the residents of that neighborhood prefer that proposal to a particular counterproposal.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Principle D ensures that demolishing houses requires exploring all alternatives first.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Question

The task is to determine which principle would appropriately justify whether demolishing houses or opting for an alternative proposal was the right decision.
02

Analyze Option A

Option A suggests adopting a course of action that results in the most housing unless safety is at risk. Analyze if this principle offers a decisive measure between demolishing or not.
03

Analyze Option B

Option B considers adopting a proposal that doesn't make the alternative impossible if it fails. Evaluate if this ensures a correct decision regarding demolition.
04

Analyze Option C

Option C prefers non-government funded proposals unless funding is assured. Determine if this applies to deciding on demolition.
05

Analyze Option D

Option D prohibits demolishing sound houses until all alternatives are considered. This principle offers a clear condition to decide on demolition based on available alternatives.
06

Analyze Option E

Option E dismisses adopting a proposal based only on majority preference regarding safety. Check if this influences the decision between proposals.
07

Select Appropriate Principle

Evaluate which principle gives a decisive metric on whether demolition was the right choice, in this case focusing on thorough investigation of alternatives as crucial.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Logical Reasoning
Logical reasoning plays a key role in evaluating which principle governs the decision of demolishing or preserving houses. It involves analyzing various factors and scenarios to draw an informed conclusion.
Understanding logical reasoning starts with recognizing patterns, connections, and the consequences of different choices.

To logically decide between demolishing houses or adopting an alternative proposal, you must:
  • Identify the premises: Statements or facts that provide the basis for the decision.
  • Analyze arguments: Critically evaluate the strength and credibility of each argument.
  • Apply logical links: Use "if-then" statements to deduce outcomes. For example, "If demolishing the houses leads to safety risks, then..."
  • Check consistency: Ensure that the decision aligns with the established facts and principles.
Understanding logical reasoning not only aids in making current decisions but also helps build skills for future problem-solving scenarios.
Decision Making
Effective decision making combines logical reasoning with situational analysis to arrive at a balanced choice.
In the context of the given problem, decision making requires considering multiple proposals and weighing their benefits and drawbacks.

The key steps to enhance decision making include:
  • Define objectives: Clearly establish what you aim to achieve, whether it’s ensuring safety or maximizing housing.
  • Analyze options: Evaluate all possible courses of action, like in Option A deciding based on maximum housing outcome unless safety is a risk.
  • Consider consequences: Anticipate both short-term and long-term effects of each decision.
  • Prioritize flexibility: Choosing plans that allow for adapting to changes, as highlighted in Option B, where exploring adaptable solutions can be ideal if the first option fails.
Making informed decisions ensures that chosen solutions are both feasible and applicable in the real-world context.
Principles of Evaluation
Principles of evaluation are essential in determining the merit and validity of decisions, particularly those concerning significant community projects such as demolitions.
Evaluation principles help in understanding which actions are justifiable and effective.
  • Thorough investigation: Before deciding, all alternatives should be comprehensively examined, as stressed in Option D. This helps in preventing premature decisions.
  • Equitable consideration: All elements of proposals should be considered without bias, ensuring an objective perspective.
  • Alignment with objectives: Any decision should support the broader goals, like community safety or housing provision.
  • Feedback integration: Learn from past decisions to improve future evaluations and outcomes.
Employing these principles ensures that the decision-making process is rigorous and leads to solutions that are both effective and sustainable.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Defendants who can afford expensive private defense lawyers have a lower conviction rate than those who rely on court-appointed public defenders. This explains why criminals who commit lucrative crimes like embezzlement or insider trading are more successful at avoiding conviction than are street criminals. The explanation offered above would be more persuasive if which one of the following were true? (A) Many street crimes, such as drug dealing, are extremely lucrative and those committing them can afford expensive private lawyers. (B) Must prosecutors are not competent to handle cases involving highly technical financial evidence and have more success in prosecuting cases of robbery or simple assault. (C) The number of criminals convicted of street crimes is far greater than the number of criminals convicted of embezzlement or insider trading- (D) The percentage of defendants who actually committed the crimes of which they are accused is no greater for publicly defended than for privately defended defendants. (E) Juries, out of sympathy for the victims of crimes, are much more likely to convict defendants accused of violent crimes than they are to convict defendants accused of "victimless" crimes or crimes against property.

Complaints that milk bottlers take enormous markups on the bottled milk sold to consumers are most likely to arise when least warranted by the actual spread between the price that bottlers pay for raw milk and the price at which they sell bottled milk. The complaints occur when the bottled-milk price rises, yet these price increases most often merely reflect the rising price of the raw milk that bottlers buy from dairy farmers. When the raw-milk price is rising, the bottlers' markups are actually smallest proportionate to the retail price. When the raw-milk price is falling, however, the markups are greatest. If all of the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true on the basis of them? (A) Consumers pay more for bottled milk when raw-milk prices are falling than when these prices are rising. (B) Increases in dairy farmers' cost of producing milk are generally not passed on to consumers. (C) Milk bottlers take substantially greater markups on bottled milk when its price is low for an extended period than when it is high for an extended period. (D) Milk bottlers generally do not respond to a decrease in raw-milk prices by straightaway proportionately lowering the price of the bottled milk they sell. (E) Consumers tend to complain more about the price they pay for bottled milk when dairy farmers are earning their smallest profits.

No mathematician today would flatly refuse to accept the results of an enormous computation as an adequate demonstration of the truth of a theorem. In 1976 , however, this was not the case. Some mathematicians at that time refused to accept the results of a complex computer demonstration of a very simple mapping theorem. Although some mathematicians still hold a strong belief that a simple theorem ought to have a short, simple proof, in fact, some simple theorems have required enormous proofs. If all of the statements in the passage are true, which one of the following must also be true? (A) Today, some mathematicians who believe that a simple theorem ought to have a simple proof would consider accepting the results of an enormous computation as a demonstration of the truth of a theorem. (B) Some individuals who believe that a simple theorem ought to have a simple proof are not mathematicians. (C) Today, some individuals who refuse to accept the results of an enormous computation as a demonstration of the truth of a theorem believe that a simple theorem ought to have a simple proof. (D) Some individuals who do not believe that a simple theorem ought to have a simple proof would not be willing to accept the results of an enormous computation as proof of a complex theorem. (E) Some nonmathematicians do not believe that a simple theorem ought to have a simple proof.

It was once believed that cells grown in laboratory tissue cultures were essentially immortal. That is, as long as all of their needs were met, they would continue dividing forever. However, it has been shown that normal cells have a finite reproductive limit. A human liver cell, for example, divides 60 times and then stops. If such a cell divides 30 times and then is put into a deep freeze for months or even years, it "remembers" where it stopped dividing. After thawing, it divides another 30 times - but no more. If the information above is accurate, a liver cell in which more than 60 divisions took place in a tissue culture CANNOT be which one of the following? (A) an abnormal human liver cell (B) a normal human liver cell that had been frozen after its first division and afterward thawed (C) a normal cell that came from the liver of an individual of a nonhuman species and had never been frozen (D) a normal liver cell that came from an individual of a nonhuman species and had been frozen after its first division and afterward thawed (E) an abnormal cell from the liver of an individual of a nonhuman species

The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45 percent of homes now have smoke detectors, whereas only 30 percent of homes had them 10 years ago. This makes early detection of house fires no more likely, however, because over half of the domestic smoke detectors are either without batteries or else inoperative for some other reason. In order for the conclusion above to be properly drawn, which one of the following assumptions would have to be made? (A) Fifteen percent of domestic smoke detectors were installed less than 10 years ago. (B) The number of fires per year in homes with smoke detectors has increased. (C) Not all of the smoke detectors in homes are battery operated. (D) The proportion of domestic smoke detectors that are inoperative has increased in the past ten years. (E) Unlike automatic water sprinklers, a properly functioning smoke detector cannot by itself increase fire safety in a home.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free