Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

According to sources who can be expected to know, Dr. Maria Esposito is going to run in the mayoral election. But if Dr. Esposito runs, Jerome Krasman will certainly not run against her. Therefore Dr. Esposito will be the only candidate in the election. The flawed reasoning in the argument above most closely parallels that in which one of the following? (A) According to its management, Brown's Stores will move next year. Without Brown's being present, no new large store can be attracted to the downtown area. Therefore the downtown area will no longer be viable as a shopping district. (B) The press release says that the rock group Rollercoaster is playing a concert on Saturday. It won't be playing on Friday if it plays on Saturday. So Saturday will be the only day this week on which Rollercoaster will perform. (C) Joshua says the interviewing panel was impressed by Marilyn. But if they were impressed by Marilyn, they probably thought less of Sven. Joshua is probably right, and so Sven will probably not get the job. (D) An informant says that Rustimann was involved in the bank robbery. If Rustimann was involved, Jones was certainly not involved. Since these two are the only people who could have been involved, Rustimann is the only person the police need to arrest. (E) The review said that this book is the best one for beginners at programming. If this book is the best, that other one can't be as good. So this one is the book we should buy.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The flawed reasoning parallels with option (D).

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Flawed Argument

The argument's conclusion states that Dr. Esposito will be the only candidate based solely on the premise that if she runs, Jerome Krasman will not run against her. This is flawed because it assumes no other candidates could run in the election.
02

Break Down the Argument Structure

The argument structure is: If A (Dr. Esposito runs), then not B (Jerome Krasman will not run). Therefore, only A will happen (Dr. Esposito is the only candidate). This reasoning mistakenly concludes a sole occurrence based on the presence and absence of only two options.
03

Identify Similar Flawed Reasoning in Options

Option (D) mirrors the structure: If A (Rustimann was involved), then not B (Jones was not involved), leading to the mistaken conclusion that only A (Rustimann) is responsible, thus disregarding other possible participants.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Flawed Arguments
In logical reasoning, flawed arguments are those that contain errors in reasoning, making their conclusions unreliable. The given exercise is a perfect example of such a flawed argument, as it prematurely concludes that Dr. Esposito will be the only candidate based on two limited pieces of information. One major flaw is the assumption there are no other possible candidates besides Dr. Esposito and Jerome Krasman.

Flawed arguments often rely on:
  • Faulty assumptions: Failing to consider all possibilities or alternative explanations.
  • Over-generalizations: Drawing broad conclusions based on limited evidence.
  • False dichotomies: Presenting only two options when more exist.
To avoid these pitfalls, it's important to critically evaluate the premises and ensure all possible conclusions are considered. Recognizing flawed arguments helps in developing robust reasoning skills essential for logical analysis.
Argument Structure
Understanding the structure of an argument is crucial in evaluating its validity. The argument in the exercise can be broken down into its simplest form: If A happens, then B will not happen. From this, it concludes that only A will happen.

This type of structure is problematic because it assumes a binary scenario without acknowledging other possibilities. The logical flaw lies in restricting the scenario to just two potential outcomes—assuming if one option doesn't occur, the other one must be the only alternative.

Key points to consider in argument structure:
  • Identify premises and conclusions clearly.
  • Understand the relationship between premises.
  • Recognize assumptions and potential oversights.
By dissecting an argument structure, one can better determine the soundness of the reasoning and identify any inherent flaws.
Reasoning Analysis
Reasoning analysis involves examining the thought process and logical steps taken to arrive at a conclusion. In our exercise, the reasoner made a mistake by not considering the complete range of options available in the election scenario.

This reasoning analysis highlights the importance of:
  • Being comprehensive: Check for all possible factors and outcomes.
  • Evaluating relevance: Ensure that each premise directly supports the conclusion.
  • Investigating the necessity: Question whether each step of the reasoning is necessary and sufficient for the conclusion.
Engaging in thorough reasoning analysis helps in evaluating not only the argument presented but also in refining one's own approach to logical problems. By scrutinizing each part of the reasoning, one can discern the validity of conclusions drawn and enhance their critical thinking skills.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Comets do not give off their own light but reflect light from other sources, such as the Sun. Scientists estimate the mass of comets by their brightness: the greater a comet's mass, the more light that comet will reflect. A satellite probe, however, has revealed that the material of which Halley's comet is composed reflects 60 times less light per unit of mass than had been previously thought. The statements above, if true, give the most support to which one of the following? (A) Some comets are composed of material that reflects 60 times more light per unit of mass than the material of which Halley's comet is composed. (B) Previous estimates of the mass of Halley's comet which were based on its brightness were too low. (C) The total amount of light reflected from Halley's comet is less than scientists had previously thought. (D) The reflective properties of the material of which comets are composed vary considerably from comet to comet. (E) Scientists need more information before they can make a good estimate of the mass of Halley's comet.

Before the printing press, books could be purchased only in expensive manuscript copies. The printing press produced books that were significantly less expensive than the manuscript editions. The public's demand for printed books in the first years after the invention of the printing press was many times greater than demand had been for manuscript copies. This increase demonstrates that there was a dramatic jump in the number of people who learned how to read in the years after publishers first started producing books on the printing press. Which one of the following statements, if true, casts doubt on the argument? (A) During the first years after the invention of the printing press, letter writing by people who wrote without the assistance of scribes or clerks exhibited a dramatic increase. (B) Books produced on the printing press are often found with written comments in the margins in the handwriting of the people who owned the books. (C) In the first years after the printing press was invented, printed books were purchased primarily by people who had always bought and read expensive manuscripts but could afford a greater number of printed books for the same money. (D) Books that were printed on the printing press in the first years after its invention often circulated among friends in informal reading clubs or libraries. (E) The first printed books published after the invention of the printing press would have been useless to illiterate people, since the books had virtually no illustrations.

Graphologists claim that it is possible to detect permanent character traits by examining people's handwriting. For example, a strong cross on the " \(t\) " is supposed to denote enthusiasm. Obviously, however, with practice and perseverance people can alter their handwriting to include this feature. So it seems that graphologists must hold that permanent character traits can be changed. The argument against graphology proceeds by (A) citing apparently incontestable evidence that leads to absurd consequences when conjoined with the view in question (B) demonstrating that an apparently controversial and interesting claim is really just a platitude (C) arguing that a particular technique of analysis can never be effective when the people analyzed know that it is being used (D) showing that proponents of the view have no theoretical justification for the view (E) attacking a technique by arguing that what the technique is supposed to detect can be detected quite readily without it

In 1974 the speed limit on highways in the United States was reduced to 55 miles per hour in order to save fuel. In the first 12 months after the change, the rate of highway fatalities dropped 15 pereent, the sharpest one-year drop in history. Over the next 10 years, the fatality rate declined by another 25 percent. It follows that the 1974 reduction in the speed limit saved many lives. Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument? (A) The 1974 fuel shortage cut driving sharply for more than a year. (B) There was no decline in the rate of highway fatalities during the twelfth year following the reduction in the speed limit. (C) Since 1974 automobile manufacturers have been required by law to install lifesaving equipment, such as seat belts, in all new cars. (D) The fatality rate in highway accidents involving motorists driving faster than 55 miles per hour is much higher than in highway accidents that do not involve motorists driving at such speeds. (E) Motorists are more likely to avoid accidents by matching their speed to that of the surrounding highway traffic than by driving at faster or slower speeds.

Which one of the following principles, if established, would determine that demolishing the houses was the right decision or instead would determine that the proposal advocated by the opponents of demolition should have been adopted? (A) When what to do about an abandoned neighborhood building is in dispute, the course of action that would result in the most housing for people who need it should be the one adopted unless the building is believed to pose a threat to neighborhood safety. (B) When there are two proposals for solving a neighborhood problem, and only one of them would preclude the possibility of trying the other approach if the first proves unsatisfactory, then the approach that does not foreclose the other possibility should be the one adopted. (C) If one of two proposals for renovating vacant neighborhood buildings requires government funding whereas the second does not, the second proposal should be the one adopted unless the necessary government funds have already been secured. (D) No plan for eliminating a neighborhood problem that requires demolishing basically sound houses should be carried out until all other possible alternatives have been thoroughly investigated. (E) No proposal for dealing with a threat to a neighborhood's safety should be adopted merely because a majority of the residents of that neighborhood prefer that proposal to a particular counterproposal.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free