Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Bevex, an artificial sweetener used only in soft drinks, is carcinogenic for mice, but only when it is consumed in very large quantities. To ingest an amount of Bevex equivalent to the amount fed to the mice in the relevant studies, a person would have to drink 25 cans of Bevex-sweetened soft drinks per day. For that reason, Bevex is in fact safe for people. In order for the conclusion that Bevex is safe for people to be properly drawn, which one of the following must be true? (A) Cancer from carcinogenic substances develops more slowly in mice than it does in people. (B) If all food additives that are currently used in foods were tested, some would be found to be carcinogenic for mice. (C) People drink fewer than 25 cans of Bevexsweetened soda per day. (D) People can obtain important health benefits by controlling their weight through the use of artificially sweetened soft drinks. (E) Some of the studies done on Bevex were not relevant to the question of whether or not Bevex is carcinogenic for people.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option C is necessary for the conclusion.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Argument's Conclusion

First, identify what the conclusion of the argument is. In this case, the argument concludes that Bevex is safe for people based on the consumption levels in the studies.
02

Determine the Assumption

To properly draw the conclusion that Bevex is safe, the argument must assume that people do not consume enough Bevex to reproduce the conditions of the study (which involved feeding mice large quantities).
03

Evaluate Each Option

Examine each of the options: - (A) is irrelevant because the speed of cancer development is not discussed. - (B) is irrelevant to the safety of Bevex specifically. - (C) directly addresses the assumption by affirming people drink fewer than 25 cans daily, matching the context of the argument. - (D) discusses health benefits unrelated to the study conditions. - (E) undermines the relevance of the studies, but does not support the argument itself.
04

Select the Correct Answer

Option (C) is the only choice that aligns with the necessary assumption for the conclusion, as it states that people do not consume Bevex in quantities similar to the mice in the study.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Logical Assumptions
In the world of logical reasoning, assumptions are the hidden links that connect the evidence to the conclusion. They are critical for understanding the underlying structure of an argument, particularly in LSAT Logic Reasoning questions. In the exercise about Bevex, the conclusion rests on the assumption that people consume fewer than 25 cans of Bevex-sweetened soda daily.
Assumptions are usually unstated, making it our job to identify them. By pinpointing the assumption, you can better understand how the argument stands. Consider assumptions as the unseen supports that ensure an argument does not collapse under scrutiny.
  • Identify what is being assumed for the conclusion to hold true.
  • Understand the gap between the premise and the conclusion.
  • Recognize that without certain assumptions, the argument fails.
This understanding will arm you with the ability to find these hidden assumptions quickly, which is a valuable skill in standardized test preparation.
Argument Evaluation
Evaluating an argument involves understanding its structure and assessing its validity. In the given exercise, the argument is:
  • Premise: Bevex is only carcinogenic in large quantities and a person must drink 25 cans daily to consume a large amount.
  • Conclusion: Bevex is therefore safe for people.
The crux of the evaluation lies in identifying the relationship between the premise and the conclusion. It is crucial to understand whether the conclusion logically follows from the premise.
Focus your evaluation on:
  • The relevance and sufficiency of the premises in supporting the conclusion.
  • Any implicit assumptions that need to be true for the conclusion to be valid.
  • Any evidential gaps or logical fallacies in the reasoning.
Evaluating arguments is a skill that can be developed with practice and is essential for not just test-taking, but for critical thinking in daily life.
Deductive Reasoning
Deductive reasoning is the process of drawing specific conclusions from general information. When you use deductive reasoning, if your premises are true and your logic flawless, your conclusion must also be true.
In the Bevex exercise, deductive reasoning is employed to decide if Bevex is safe for people based on the given premise that a large quantity is carcinogenic in mice. The jump from the premise to the conclusion must be seamless, relying on the assumption about human consumption patterns.
Key aspects of deductive reasoning include:
  • Logical progression from general statements to specific conclusions.
  • Clear, distinct premises leading to a definitive conclusion.
  • Relying on evidence or accepted facts as the starting point.
By practicing deductive reasoning, you become adept at constructing sound, valid arguments, an invaluable skill both academically and in everyday problem-solving.
Standardized Test Preparation
Preparing for standardized tests, especially those involving logic like the LSAT, takes a strategic approach. The focus is not only on content review but also on sharpening reasoning skills and test-taking strategies.
To effectively prepare, you should:
  • Practice identifying assumptions in arguments as they are often tested.
  • Review logical reasoning questions to gain familiarity with common question types.
  • Work on time management to ensure you can thoroughly analyze arguments within the exam's time constraints.
  • Take practice tests under timed conditions to simulate the actual test day experience.
Preparation goes beyond mere memorization; it involves improving logical deduction and critical thinking. These skills are not only critical for the LSAT but are also crucial in professional situations where sound reasoning is required.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Since the introduction of the Impanian National Health scheme, Impanians (or their private insurance companies) have had to pay only for the more unusual and sophisticated medical procedures. When the scheme was introduced, it was hoped that private insurance to pay for these procedures would be available at modest cost, since the insurers would no longer be paying for the bulk of health care costs, as they had done previously. Paradoxically, however, the cost of private health insurance did not decrease but has instead increased dramatically in the years since the scheme's introduction. Which one of the following, if true, does most to explain the apparently paradoxical outcome? (A) The National Health scheme has greatly reduced the number of medical claims handled annually by Impania's private insurers, enabling these firms to reduce overhead costs substantially. (B) Before the National Health scheme was introduced, more than 80 percent of all Impanian medical costs were associated with procedures that are now covered by the scheme. (C) Impanians who previously were unable to afford regular medical treatment now use the National Health scheme, but the number of Impanians with private health insurance has not increased. (D) Impanians now buy private medical insurance only at times when they expect that they will need care of kinds not available in the National Health scheme. (E) The proportion of total expenditures within Impania that is spent on health care has declined since the introduction of the National Health scheme.

In a study of the effect of radiation from nuclear weapons plants on people living in areas near them, researchers compared death rates in the areas near the plants with death rates in areas that had no such plants. Finding no difference in these rates, the researchers concluded that radiation from the nuclear weapons plants poses no health hazards to people living near them. Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the researchers' argument? (A) Nuclear power plants were not included in the study. (B) The areas studied had similar death rates before and after the nuclear weapons plants were built. (C) Exposure to nuclear radiation can cause many serious diseases that do not necessarily result in death. (D) Only a small number of areas have nuclear weapons plants. (E) The researchers did not study the possible health hazards of radiation on people who were employed at the nuclear weapons plants if those employees did not live in the study areas.

Edwina: True appreciation of Mozart's music demands that you hear it exactly as he intended it to be heard; that is, exactly as he heard it. Since he heard it on eighteenth-century instruments, it follows that so should we. Alberto: But what makes you think that Mozart ever heard his music played as he had intended it to be played? After all, Mozart was writing at a time when the performer was expected, as a matter of course, not just to interpret but to modify the written score. Alberto adopts which one of the following strategies in criticizing Edwina's position? (A) He appeals to an academic authority in order to challenge the factual basis of her conchusion. (B) He attacks her judgment by suggesting that she does not recognize the importance of the performer's creativity to the audience's appreciation of a musical composition. (C) He defends a competing view of musical authenticity. (D) He attacks the logic of her argument by suggesting that the conclusion she draws does not follow from the premises she sets forth. (E) He offers a reason to believe that one of the premises of her argument is false.

For the writers who first gave feudalism its name, the existence of feudalism presupposed the existence of a noble class. Yet there cannot be a noble class, properly speaking, unless both the titles that indicate superior, noble status and the inheritance of such titles are sanctioned by law. Although feudalism existed in Europe as early as the eighth century, it was not until the twelfth century, when many feudal institutions were in decline, that the hereditary transfer of legally recognized titles of nobility first appeared. The statements above, if true, most strongly support which one of the following claims? (A) To say that feudalism by definition requires the existence of a nobility is to employ a definition that distorts history. (B) Prior to the twelfth century, the institution of European feudalism functioned without the presence of a dominant class. (C) The fact that a societal group has a distinct legal status is not in itself sufficient to allow that group to be properly considered a social class. (D) The decline of feudalism in Europe was the only cause of the rise of a European nobility. (E) The prior existence of feudal institutions is a prerequisite for the emergence of a nobility, as defined in the strictest sense of the term.

Of all the surgeons practicing at the city hospital, the chief surgeon has the worst record in terms of the percentage of his patients who die either during or immediately following an operation performed by him. Paradoxically, the hospital's administrators claim that he is the best surgeon currently working at the hospital. Which one of the following, if true, goes farthest toward showing that the administrators' claim and the statistic cited might both be correct? (A) Since the hospital administrators appoint the chief surgeon, the administrators are strongly motivated to depict the chief surgeon they have chosen as a wise choice. (B) In appointing the current chief surgeon, the hospital administrators followed the practice, well established at the city hospital, of promoting one of the surgeons already on staff. (C) Some of the younger surgeons on the city hospital's staff received part of their training from the current chief surgeon. (D) At the city hospital those operations that inherently entail the greatest risk to the life of the patient are generally performed by the chief surgeon. (E) The current chief surgeon has a better record of patients' surviving surgery than did his immediate predecessor.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free