Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Before the printing press, books could be purchased only in expensive manuscript copies. The printing press produced books that were significantly less expensive than the manuscript editions. The public's demand for printed books in the first years after the invention of the printing press was many times greater than demand had been for manuscript copies. This increase demonstrates that there was a dramatic jump in the number of people who learned how to read in the years after publishers first started producing books on the printing press. Which one of the following statements, if true, casts doubt on the argument? (A) During the first years after the invention of the printing press, letter writing by people who wrote without the assistance of scribes or clerks exhibited a dramatic increase. (B) Books produced on the printing press are often found with written comments in the margins in the handwriting of the people who owned the books. (C) In the first years after the printing press was invented, printed books were purchased primarily by people who had always bought and read expensive manuscripts but could afford a greater number of printed books for the same money. (D) Books that were printed on the printing press in the first years after its invention often circulated among friends in informal reading clubs or libraries. (E) The first printed books published after the invention of the printing press would have been useless to illiterate people, since the books had virtually no illustrations.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option (C) casts doubt by suggesting existing readers bought more books, not new readers.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Argument

The argument proposes that the increased demand for printed books after the invention of the printing press indicates a jump in the number of people who learned to read.
02

Identify the Assumption

The implicit assumption here is that increased book demand resulted from an increased number of readers rather than other factors, such as existing readers buying more books at a cheaper price.
03

Find the Statement to Cast Doubt

Look for a statement that undermines the assumption that more people learned to read. Instead, consider factors like economic accessibility or existing literate individuals increasing their book collection.
04

Analyze Option (C)

Option (C) states that printed books were mostly purchased by those who already bought expensive manuscripts. This suggests that the demand increased because existing readers could buy more books rather than an increase in new readers.
05

Evaluate Other Options

Check other options for their ability to undermine the link between increased demand and more people learning to read: (A) and (B) don't address the number of new readers; (D) and (E) focus on book usage, not increase in reader numbers.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Critical Thinking
Critical thinking is the process of carefully and systematically analyzing information before reaching a conclusion. This involves evaluating assumptions, identifying biases, and considering the evidence presented. For example, in the exercise concerning the printing press, a critical thinker needs to question whether the increased demand for books truly reflects an increase in literacy.
By scrutinizing the underlying assumptions, they might realize that the ability to purchase more books could stem from books being more affordable, or it could simply mean existing readers are buying more books.
  • Ask questions: Always question the initial assumptions.
  • Consider counterarguments: Look at other reasons for the increased book demand.
  • Analyze different perspectives: Determine if the change in numbers truly indicates a rise in literacy or other factors.
Developing critical thinking skills is crucial when analyzing arguments and making informed decisions.
Argument Evaluation
Argument evaluation refers to the systematic process of assessing the reasons given in support of or against a conclusion. It entails considering the logical structure and the soundness of the reasoning.
In the reading comprehension exercise we discussed, the argument hinges on the link between the increase in book demand and the rise in literacy. Option (C) challenges this by suggesting that existing readers simply bought more, which weakens the connection between demand and literacy growth.
  • Understand the structure: Identify the conclusion and reasons presented.
  • Assess assumptions: Check whether they logically lead to the conclusion.
  • Seek out weaknesses: Determine if there are holes in the assumptions, like in the exercise where other factors could explain increased demand.
Mastering argument evaluation enables better judgment and a more reasoned approach to problem-solving.
Literacy Development
Literacy development is the enhancement of abilities related to reading, writing, and understanding text. In this context, analyzing how literacy rates might have changed due to the advent of the printing press is essential.
While the argument in the exercise suggests that more books mean more readers, literacy could also be influenced by other educational factors, such as improved access to education and learning materials, not just the availability of books.
  • Identify influencing factors: Consider what truly boosts literacy rates, such as education policies or community programs.
  • Understand the timeline: Literacy development may not directly parallel the rise in book availability.
  • Evaluate data: Investigate historical records or studies for concrete evidence about literacy rates.
Understanding literacy development helps clarify how societal changes can influence the reading abilities of a population.
Historical Context of Reading
Placing reading within its historical context involves examining how societal changes and technological advances have influenced reading practices and literacy over time.
The invention of the printing press was a monumental shift that lowered the cost of books and made them more accessible. The exercise illustrates the argument that more accessible books led to an increase in the reading population, but understanding the broader historical context is crucial.
  • Technological advancements: Recognize how inventions like the printing press can alter reading habits.
  • Social changes: Consider how literacy was valued within society at the time.
  • Economic factors: Books became more affordable, but did this truly correlate with more individuals learning to read?
By examining historical context, we gain insights into how reading has evolved and the various factors that have shaped literacy across different periods.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Nutritionists have recommended that people eat more fiber. Advertisements for a new fiber-supplement pill state only that it contains " 44 percent fiber." The advertising claim is misleading in its selection of information on which to focus if which one of the following is true? (A) There are other products on the market that are advertised as providing fiber as a dietary supplement. (B) Nutritionists base their recommendation on medical findings that dietary fiber protects against some kinds of cancer. (C) It is possible to become addicted to some kinds of advertised pills, such as sleeping pills and painkillers. (D) The label of the advertised product recommends taking 3 pills every day. (E) The recommended daily intake of fiber is 20 to 30 grams, and the pill contains one-third gram.

Since the introduction of the Impanian National Health scheme, Impanians (or their private insurance companies) have had to pay only for the more unusual and sophisticated medical procedures. When the scheme was introduced, it was hoped that private insurance to pay for these procedures would be available at modest cost, since the insurers would no longer be paying for the bulk of health care costs, as they had done previously. Paradoxically, however, the cost of private health insurance did not decrease but has instead increased dramatically in the years since the scheme's introduction. Which one of the following, if true, does most to explain the apparently paradoxical outcome? (A) The National Health scheme has greatly reduced the number of medical claims handled annually by Impania's private insurers, enabling these firms to reduce overhead costs substantially. (B) Before the National Health scheme was introduced, more than 80 percent of all Impanian medical costs were associated with procedures that are now covered by the scheme. (C) Impanians who previously were unable to afford regular medical treatment now use the National Health scheme, but the number of Impanians with private health insurance has not increased. (D) Impanians now buy private medical insurance only at times when they expect that they will need care of kinds not available in the National Health scheme. (E) The proportion of total expenditures within Impania that is spent on health care has declined since the introduction of the National Health scheme.

No mathematician today would flatly refuse to accept the results of an enormous computation as an adequate demonstration of the truth of a theorem. In 1976 , however, this was not the case. Some mathematicians at that time refused to accept the results of a complex computer demonstration of a very simple mapping theorem. Although some mathematicians still hold a strong belief that a simple theorem ought to have a short, simple proof, in fact, some simple theorems have required enormous proofs. If all of the statements in the passage are true, which one of the following must also be true? (A) Today, some mathematicians who believe that a simple theorem ought to have a simple proof would consider accepting the results of an enormous computation as a demonstration of the truth of a theorem. (B) Some individuals who believe that a simple theorem ought to have a simple proof are not mathematicians. (C) Today, some individuals who refuse to accept the results of an enormous computation as a demonstration of the truth of a theorem believe that a simple theorem ought to have a simple proof. (D) Some individuals who do not believe that a simple theorem ought to have a simple proof would not be willing to accept the results of an enormous computation as proof of a complex theorem. (E) Some nonmathematicians do not believe that a simple theorem ought to have a simple proof.

When individual students are all treated equally in that they have identical exposure to curriculum material, the rate, quality, and quantity of learning will vary from student to student. If all students are to master a given curriculum, some of them need different types of help than others, as any experienced teacher knows. If the statements above are both true, which one of the following conclusions can be drawn on the basis of them? (A) Unequal treatment, in a sense, of individual students is required in order to ensure equality with respect to the educational tasks they master. (B) The rate and quality of learning, with leaming understood as the acquiring of the ability to solve problems within a given curriculum area, depend on the quantity of teaching an individual student receives in any given curriculum. (C) The more experienced the teacher is, the more the students will learn. (D) All students should have identical exposure to learn the material being taught in any given curriculum. (E) Teachers should help each of their students to learn as much as possible.

Sheila: Health experts generally agree that smoking a tobacco product for many years is very likely to be harmful to the smoker's health. Tim: On the contrary, smoking has no effect on health at all: although my grandfather smoked three cigars a day from the age of fourteen, he died at age ninety-six. A major weakness of Tim's counterargument is that his counterargument (A) attempts to refute a probabilistic conclusion by claiming the existence of a single counterexample (B) challenges expert opinion on the basis of specific information unavailable to experts in the field (C) describes an individual case that is explicitly discounted as an exception to the experts' conclusion (D) presupposes that longevity and health status are unrelated to each other in the general population (E) tacitly assumes that those health experts who are in agreement on this issue arrived at that agreement independently of one another

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free