Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The passage suggests that each of the following contributed to Congress's enacting the War Powers Resolution of 1973 EXCEPT (A) a change in the attitude in Congress toward exercising its role in the use of armed forces (B) the failure of Presidents to uphold commitments specified in defense treaties (C) Congress's desire to be consulted concerning United States military actions instigated by the President (D) the amount of money spent on recent conflicts waged without a declaration of war (E) the number of lives lost in Vietnam

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option B: Failure of Presidents to uphold defense treaty commitments.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the War Powers Resolution of 1973

The War Powers Resolution of 1973 was a federal law intended to check the President's power to commit the United States to an armed conflict without Congress's consent. It was enacted in response to issues like the Vietnam War, where Congress felt its constitutional authority over war was being bypassed.
02

Analyze Each Option

Evaluate how each option relates to the context of the War Powers Resolution: - **Option A:** Reflects a change in Congress's attitude towards exercising its war-related role, which aligns with the reasons behind the enactment. - **Option B:** Refers to Presidents not upholding defense treaty commitments, which is less relevant to the direct reasons for the War Powers Resolution. - **Option C:** Indicates Congress's desire for involvement in military decisions, highly relevant to the War Powers context. - **Option D:** Focuses on financial concerns over undeclared wars, pertinent to Congressional motivations. - **Option E:** Deals with the human cost in Vietnam, significantly influencing the resolution's enactment.
03

Identify the Outlier

Determine which option is least related to the reasons behind the War Powers Resolution: The correct outlier is **Option B** because it discusses a presidential failure regarding defense treaties, which was not a primary factor mentioned for the War Powers Resolution. In comparison, other options directly address Congress's motivations to regain its authority in war-making decisions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Congressional authority
The War Powers Resolution of 1973 highlights the pivotal role of congressional authority in the realm of U.S. military actions. Congress, tasked with the power to declare war as per the Constitution, sought through this resolution to reclaim its role in authorizing military engagements. During the Vietnam War era, presidents increasingly committed U.S. forces without explicit Congressional approval, leading to concerns over the bypassing of legislative oversight.

Through this resolution, Congress aimed to ensure:
  • That military action should not happen without their consultation and approval.
  • A check on presidential power, to prevent prolonged military engagements without legislative backing.
Understanding congressional authority is key to grasp the intention behind the resolution: restoring the balance between the legislative and executive branches in war-making decisions.
Presidential power
Presidential power in military matters has been a source of debate particularly in the context of the War Powers Resolution of 1973. Prior to this resolution, presidents increasingly used their role as Commander in Chief to engage U.S. forces in conflicts without explicit congressional declarations of war.

This expansion of presidential power raised questions about its limits. The War Powers Resolution was enacted to counter this trend and to ensure presidents do not overstep their authority. Its main provisions necessitate that:
  • The president must notify Congress within 48 hours of deploying military forces.
  • Armed forces cannot remain for more than 60 days, with a further 30-day withdrawal period, unless Congress grants approval or declares war.
This was an effort to ensure a more collaborative approach between the president and Congress in military decision-making.
United States military actions
United States military actions often require a delicate balance between prompt response and legislative oversight. The War Powers Resolution aimed to clarify this by stipulating how and when military force can be used by the President.

The resolution was significant because it attempted to delineate when Congressional consultation and approval were necessary, hence maintaining a democratic check on military engagements.
  • This ensured that any prolonged military action needed Congressional oversight.
  • These rules were especially relevant in situations where the U.S. was involved in overseas conflicts without the formal declaration of war, as happened frequently post-World War II.
Understanding these legislative constraints is essential to grasp how U.S. military strategy and diplomacy have been shaped to comply with constitutional checks.
Vietnam War
The Vietnam War played a critical role in the enactment of the War Powers Resolution. This prolonged conflict witnessed significant U.S. military involvement, yet it was not declared an official war by Congress. The human and financial costs of this engagement largely influenced the push for legislative oversight on presidential military power.

The Vietnam War highlighted the need for:
  • Stronger checks on the President's ability to engage in military operations without Congress’s sanction.
  • A re-evaluation of how military decisions were made in light of the extensive casualties and resources committed under executive orders.
By understanding the context of the Vietnam War, one can better appreciate why Congress felt compelled to pass the War Powers Resolution. This historical backdrop is crucial to comprehend the shifts in power dynamics between the executive and legislative branches concerning war-related decisions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

13\. An irony resulting from the announcement that sharks will be placed on the managed species list is (A) We will now find out less about cancer, so in effect by saving the sharks, we are hurting ourselves. (B) sharks are far more dangerous to other fish than we are to them. (C) more chefs are now using the cartilaginous tissues found in shark fins. (D) more sharks are being killed now than before the announcement. (E) man will now protect a creature that he has been the victim of.

We all know that when there is a clear sky, the western sky appears red as the sun sets. From the information presented in the passage, this phenomenon would seem to be explained by which of the following? I. Light meets more obstacles when passing parallel to the earth's surface than when traveling perpendicular. Consequently, even red light is diffused. II. The blue light may not make it through the denser pathway of the evening sky, leaving only the long light waves of red. III. The short red light waves have more energy and are the only waves that can make it through the thick atmosphere of the evening sky. (A) I only (B) II only (C) I and II only (D) II and III only (E) I, II, and III

An irony resulting from the announcement that sharks will be placed on the managed species list is (A) We will now find out less about cancer, so in effect by saving the sharks, we are hurting ourselves. (B) sharks are far more dangerous to other fish than we are to them. (C) more chefs are now using the cartilaginous tissues found in shark fins. (D) more sharks are being killed now than before the announcement. (E) man will now protect a creature that he has been the victim of.

Which one of the following is a reason for assuming that sunlight is constituted of waves of many colors? (A) The mixture of waves that make up sunlight has to struggle through a variety of obstacles in the atmosphere. (B) When passing through water in the atmosphere, sunlight is sometimes broken down into an array of colors. (C) Many different wavelengths of light enter our eyes from all directions. (D) The mere fact that light waves can be scattered is a reason for assuming that sunlight is constituted of waves of different colors. (E) When passing through dust in the atmosphere, sunlight is sometimes broken down into an array of colors.

Scientists have observed that shorter wavelength light has more energy than longer wavelength light. From this we can conclude that (A) red light will exert more energy when it hits the surface of the earth than will blue light. (B) lightning is caused by the collision of blue light with particles in the air. (C) red light will travel faster than blue light. (D) blue light has more energy than red light. (E) blue light has less energy than red light.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free