Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Students who are "dualistic" thinkers may not be able to support their beliefs convincingly because (A) most of their beliefs cannot be supported by arguments. (B) they have accepted their "truths" simply because authorities have said these things are "true." (C) they half-believe and half-disbelieve just about everything. (D) their teachers almost always think that "dualistic" thinkers are wrong. (E) they are enslaved by their authorities.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option (B) they have accepted their "truths" simply because authorities have said these things are "true."

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Concept of Dualistic Thinkers

A dualistic thinker perceives the world in binary terms, such as good vs. bad or right vs. wrong. They tend to accept beliefs as absolute truths without questioning or critically evaluating them.
02

Analyze Option (A)

Consider if dualistic thinkers cannot support their beliefs because most beliefs inherently lack support. This is unlikely, as the issue is not about inherent lack but about the nature of how beliefs are accepted.
03

Analyze Option (B)

Evaluate if dualistic thinkers accept truths because authorities declare them so. This fits their nature, as they often rely on external authorities to determine truth, without further justification.
04

Analyze Option (C)

Explore if dualistic thinkers half-believe and half-disbelieve things. This does not align with their characteristic way of seeing things clearly in black and white.
05

Analyze Option (D)

Assess if teachers believe dualistic thinkers to be wrong. This is about perception by others, not the conviction of dualistic thinkers themselves, thus irrelevant here.
06

Analyze Option (E)

Consider if dualistic thinkers are enslaved by their authorities. While suggests dependency, it doesn’t explain inability to support beliefs convincingly.
07

Select the Correct Answer

Based on the analysis, option (B) is the most fitting because dualistic thinkers accept truths based on authority, making it difficult for them to support these beliefs convincingly.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Dualistic Thinking
Dualistic thinking is a way of understanding the world where things are seen in black and white. This means that dualistic thinkers view situations, beliefs, and people in terms that are either all good or all bad. There is little room for gray areas or nuance. They often accept information as an absolute truth without questioning it. This can lead them to hold beliefs that they cannot defend when challenged. For instance, if an authority figure states something is true, a dualistic thinker is likely to accept it at face value, without evaluating the reasoning behind it. As a result, their ability to engage in critical thinking, where they analyze and evaluate evidence, is limited. A common example could be with moral viewpoints; dualistic thinkers may regard actions as strictly right or wrong based on rules, without considering context or perspective.
Belief Evaluation
Belief evaluation is the process of critically assessing the validity of a belief. For dualistic thinkers, this can be a difficult task. Evaluating a belief requires examining reasons, evidence, and potential biases. However, dualistic thinkers often prefer to rely on authority rather than personal investigation. This reliance on authority figures means they tend to skip the verification process where they would traditionally ask questions like: "Why is this true?" or "What evidence supports this claim?" They may struggle with formulating strong arguments to back their beliefs, as they often accept them without examining underlying assumptions. Hence, without this evaluation, their ability to convincingly support their beliefs in discussions or debates becomes constrained.
Argument Support
Supporting an argument effectively involves presenting evidence and reasoning that backs up a claim. For dualistic thinkers, this is particularly challenging. Their inclination to accept beliefs as absolutes from authority can hamper their ability to present their arguments adequately. Due to the lack of critical evaluation of their beliefs, they often cannot articulate coherent arguments when asked to justify them. Good argument support requires:
  • understanding various sides of an issue,
  • analyzing the evidence,
  • and considering alternative viewpoints.
Dualistic thinkers may find these steps harder because of their tendency to stick to a black-and-white perspective. To improve, they could benefit from practicing critical thinking exercises that encourage the exploration of complex ideas.
Educational Psychology
Educational psychology deals with understanding how people learn and process information. The concepts of dualistic thinking and belief evaluation fall squarely within this realm. By examining the cognitive development of students, educational psychologists aim to discover why some individuals may struggle with critical thinking or supporting their arguments. They explore minds like dualistic thinkers who may not have been taught or encouraged to expand beyond simple black-and-white thinking. Educational interventions can help these students develop more nuanced thinking skills by:
  • exposing them to diverse perspectives,
  • engaging them in critical inquiry,
  • and encouraging continuous questioning and exploration.
Through such tailored educational strategies, psychologists aim to foster better critical thinking and argument support skills in students who naturally lean towards dualistic thought patterns.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The passage suggests that each of the following contributed to Congress's enacting the War Powers Resolution of 1973 EXCEPT (A) a change in the attitude in Congress toward exercising its role in the use of armed forces (B) the failure of Presidents to uphold commitments specified in defense treaties (C) Congress's desire to be consulted concerning United States military actions instigated by the President (D) the amount of money spent on recent conflicts waged without a declaration of war (E) the number of lives lost in Vietnam

13\. An irony resulting from the announcement that sharks will be placed on the managed species list is (A) We will now find out less about cancer, so in effect by saving the sharks, we are hurting ourselves. (B) sharks are far more dangerous to other fish than we are to them. (C) more chefs are now using the cartilaginous tissues found in shark fins. (D) more sharks are being killed now than before the announcement. (E) man will now protect a creature that he has been the victim of.

Scientists have observed that shorter wavelength light has more energy than longer wavelength light. From this we can conclude that (A) red light will exert more energy when it hits the surface of the earth than will blue light. (B) lightning is caused by the collision of blue light with particles in the air. (C) red light will travel faster than blue light. (D) blue light has more energy than red light. (E) blue light has less energy than red light.

According to the provisions of the War Powers Resolution of 1973 as described in the passage, if the President perceives that an international conflict warrants the immediate involvement of United States armed forces, the President is compelled in every instance to (A) request that Congress consider a formal declaration of war (B) consult with the leaders of both houses of Congress before deploying armed forces (C) desist from deploying any troops unless expressly approved by Congress (D) report to Congress within 48 hours of the deployment of armed forces (E) withdraw any armed forces deployed in such a conflict within 60 days unless war is declared

We all know that when there is a clear sky, the western sky appears red as the sun sets. From the information presented in the passage, this phenomenon would seem to be explained by which of the following? I. Light meets more obstacles when passing parallel to the earth's surface than when traveling perpendicular. Consequently, even red light is diffused. II. The blue light may not make it through the denser pathway of the evening sky, leaving only the long light waves of red. III. The short red light waves have more energy and are the only waves that can make it through the thick atmosphere of the evening sky. (A) I only (B) II only (C) I and II only (D) II and III only (E) I, II, and III

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free