Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Advertisement: Clark brand-name parts are made for cars manufactured in this country. They satisfy all of our government automotive teststhe toughest such tests in the world. With foreign-made parts, you never know which might be reliable and which are cheap lookalikes that are poorly constructed and liable to cost you hundreds of dollars in repairs. Therefore, be smart and insist on brand-name parts by Clark for your car. The argument requires the assumption that (A) Clark parts are available only in this country (B) foreign-made parts are not suitable for cars manufactured in this country (C) no foreign-made parts satisfy our government standards (D) parts that satisfy our government standards are not as poorly constructed as cheap foreign-made parts (E) if parts are made for cars manufactured in our country, they are not poorly constructed

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option (D) is needed for the argument.

Step by step solution

01

Analyze the Argument

The argument states that Clark parts are made for domestic cars and satisfy the toughest government automotive tests. It contrasts this with foreign parts, which may be unreliable or poorly constructed, suggesting the reader should choose Clark parts for reliability.
02

Identify the Conclusion

The conclusion of the argument is that consumers should choose Clark brand-name parts for their cars because they are more reliable than foreign parts.
03

Determine Necessary Assumption

To support the conclusion, the argument assumes that there is a significant difference in the quality between parts that meet government standards and cheap foreign parts. Specifically, that passing government standards indicate better construction quality compared to the poorly constructed cheap parts.
04

Test Each Option

Evaluate each provided option to see if it logically fills the gap between the premise and the conclusion: - (A) is irrelevant as availability is not discussed. - (B) suggests unsuitability but does not address the main point of construction quality. - (C) weakens the argument by excluding all foreign parts outright and does not address construction details. - (D) directly states that parts meeting government standards are better constructed than cheap foreign counterparts, fitting the assumption needed. - (E) does not make a clear comparison between government standards and foreign parts.
05

Choose the Best Option

Option (D) is the best choice as it directly supports the argument's contrast between Clark parts and foreign parts by highlighting that parts meeting government standards are better constructed, addressing the assumption of reliability.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Argument Analysis
Understanding argument analysis is crucial in cracking logical reasoning questions on the LSAT. It involves breaking down a given statement into its core components. These components typically include:
  • Premises: These are the foundational statements or facts presented to support a conclusion.
  • Conclusion: Often derived from the premises, this is the main statement or action the argument suggests is true.
  • Assumptions: Unstated elements that must hold true for the conclusion to be valid.
In the example exercise, the argument's premise is that Clark's car parts meet tough government tests, implying superiority over foreign parts. The conclusion is that consumers should insist on Clark parts for reliability.
Assumption Identification
In logical reasoning, the ability to identify assumptions is key to evaluating the strength of an argument. An assumption in this context can be considered a missing bridge between a premise and the conclusion. When identifying assumptions:
  • Look for gaps between the premise and the conclusion that need to be filled for the argument to hold true.
  • Consider what must be true for the conclusion to logically follow from the premise.
In our exercise, the argument assumes that passing government tests equates to better construction quality. This fills the gap between government standards and the claimed reliability of Clark parts.
Critical Reasoning
Critical reasoning involves evaluating arguments to determine their validity and soundness. It requires questioning the strength and relevance of the premises and whether the conclusion logically follows. To apply critical reasoning effectively, ask yourself:
  • Does the conclusion logically follow from the premises?
  • Are there any logical fallacies or irrelevant statements?
In the advertisement argument, critical reasoning reveals that the conclusion might oversimplify the issue by linking meeting government standards directly with quality, which raises questions about possible alternatives or exceptions.
Test Preparation
Preparing for the LSAT involves honing skills in argument analysis, assumption identification, and critical reasoning. Here are some tips to improve your performance:
  • Practice Regularly: Frequent practice with varied logical reasoning questions helps build familiarity with common argument structures.
  • Review Mistakes: Learn from incorrect responses by understanding why a particular answer wasn't ideal.
  • Simulate Test Conditions: Practice under timed conditions to improve your speed and efficiency.
  • Decipher Complex Language: Become adept at translating complex arguments into simpler terms for better understanding.
By integrating these habits, you'll bolster the critical skills needed for success in logical reasoning sections.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Marine biologists have long thought that variation in the shell color of aquatic snails evolved as protective camouflage against birds and other predators. Brown shells seem to be more frequent when the underlying seafloor is dark-colored and white shells more frequent when the underlying seafloor is light-colored. A new theory has been advanced, however, that claims that shell color is related to physiological stress associated with heat absorption. According to this theory, brown shells will be more prevalent in areas where the wave action of the sea is great and thus heat absorption from the Sun is minimized, whereas white shells will be more numerous in calmer waters, where the snails will absorb more heat from the Sun's rays. Evidence that would strongly favor the new theory over the traditional theory would be the discovery of a large majority of (A) dark-shelled snails in a calm inlet with a dark, rocky bottom and many predators (B) dark-shelled snails in a calm inlet with a white, sandy bottom (C) light-shelled snails in an inlet with much wave action and a dark, rocky bottom (D) light-shelled snails in a calm inlet with a dark, rocky bottom and many predators (E) light-shelled snails in a calm inlet with a white, sandy bottom and many predators

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? (A) Urban pollution has not doubled in the past decade. (B) Doctors and patients generally ignore the role of allergies in asthma. (C) Bronchial inhalers are unsafe, even when used according to the recommended instructions. (D) The use of bronchial inhalers aggravates other discases that frequently occur among asthma sufferers and that often lead to fatal outcomes even when the asthma itself does not. (E) Increased urban pollution, improved recording of asthma deaths, and the use of bronchial inhalers are the only possible explanations of the increased death rate due to asthma.

"If the forest continues to disappear at its present pace, the koala will approach extinction," said the biologist. "So all that is needed to save the koala is to stop deforestation," said the politician. Which one of the following statements is consistent with the biologist's claim but not with the politician's claim? (A) Deforestation continues and the koala becomes extinct. (B) Deforestation is stopped and the koala becomes extinct. (C) Reforestation begins and the koala survives. (D) Deforestation is slowed and the koala survives. (E) Deforestation is slowed and the koala approaches extinction.

Every week, the programming office at an FM radio station reviewed unsolicited letters from listeners who were expressing comments on the station's programs. One week, the station received 50 letters with favorable comments about the station's news reporting and music selection and 10 letters with unfavorable comments on the station's new movie review segment of the evening program. Faced with this information, the programming director assumed that if some listeners did not like the movie review segment, then there must be other listeners who did like it. Therefore, he decided to continue the movie review segment of the evening program. Which one of the following identifies a problem with the programming director's decision process? (A) He failed to recognize that people are more likely to write letters of criticism than of praise. (B) He could not properly infer from the fact that some listeners did not like the movie review segment that some others did. (C) He failed to take into consideration the discrepancy in numbers between favorable and unfavorable letters received. (D) He failed to take into account the relation existing between the movie review segment and the news. (E) He did not wait until he received at least 50 letters with unfavorable comments about the movie review segment before making his decision.

Alia: Hawthorne admits that he has influence with high governmenut officials. He further awluits that he sold that influence to an environmental interest group. There can be no justification for this kind of unethical behavior. Martha: I disagree that he was unethical. The group that retained Hawthorne's services is dedicated to the cause of preventing water pollution. So, in using his influence to benefit this group, Hawthorne also benefited the public. Alia and Martha disagree on whether (A) the meaning of ethical behavior has changed over time (B) the consequences of Hawthorne's behavior can ethically justify that behavior (C) the standards for judging ethical behavior can be imposed on Hawthorne by another (D) the meaning of ethical behavior is the same in a public situation as in a private one (E) the definition of ethical behavior is rooted in philosophy or religion

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free