Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A gas tax of one cent per gallon would raise one billion dollars per year at current consumption rates. Since a tax of fifty cents per gallon would therefore raise fifty billion dollars per year, it seems a perfect way to deal with the federal budget deficit. This tax would have the additional advantage that the resulting drop in the demand for gasoline would be ecologically sound and would keep our country from being too dependent on foreign oil producers. Which one of the following most clearly identifies an error in the author's reasoning? (A) The author cites irrelevant data. (B) The author relies on incorrect current consumption figures. (C) The author makes incompatible assumptions. (D) The author mistakes an effect for a cause. (E) The author appeals to conscience rather than reason.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The error is best identified as (C) The author makes incompatible assumptions.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Scenario

The author claims that a gas tax of one cent per gallon raises one billion dollars, implying that a fifty-cent tax would raise fifty billion dollars. Accompanying advantages include ecological benefits and reduced foreign oil dependency.
02

Identify the Flaw in the Logic

Analyze the reasoning: the author assumes the relationship between the amount of tax and revenue is linear, neglecting the potential reduction in gas consumption due to the increase in tax. This omission suggests faulty reasoning due to incompatible assumptions.
03

Analyze the Options

Review the options to find which best describes the error. The choices are about relevance, accuracy, assumptions, causal relationships, and logical appeal.
04

Match the Flaw to an Option

Option C ('The author makes incompatible assumptions') best matches the reasoning error because the author wrongly assumes a constant consumption rate irrespective of tax increase.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Critical Thinking
Critical thinking is the ability to analyze and evaluate an idea or situation carefully. In logical reasoning exercises like the LSAT, critical thinking involves scrutinizing arguments to identify hidden assumptions and potential flaws. For the given exercise, a crucial part of critical thinking is identifying that the proposal assumes a linear relationship between tax rates and revenue. - Critical thinking encourages us to - Question assumptions, such as whether gas consumption rates remain unchanged with higher taxes. - Seek additional information that could affect the outcome, like potential behavior change in consumers. - Consider all counter-arguments, foreseeing what might not work as expected. Engagement in critical thinking leads to better insights and helps avoid traps like hasty generalizations or oversimplified logical connections.
Logical Assumptions
Logical assumptions are foundational ideas that an argument relies upon to make its case. These assumptions are not always explicitly stated and require critical observation to be unearthed. In our scenario: - The key assumption is that increasing the gas tax will linearly raise the revenue. - Another implicit assumption is that ecological and economic benefits are directly linked without considering intermediary effects. Recognizing these assumptions helps in: - Understanding the structure and foundation of an argument. - Identifying which assumptions hold up and which need re-examination or additional support. - Making informed judgments about the validity of the argument.
Argument Analysis
Argument analysis involves dissecting the given proposition to understand its core and determine its soundness. This is essential to recognize the strengths and weaknesses of any argument. In this exercise: - Break down the argument into claims. Here, the primary claim is that a fifty-cent per gallon tax will raise fifty billion dollars a year. - Examine each claim for logical consistency and empirical support. The assumption of unchanged consumption levels despite higher taxes lacks support, thus weakening the argument. Successful argument analysis helps you: - Differentiate between well-founded arguments and those that are potentially flawed. - Identify what parts of the argument need more evidence or revision.
Flaw Identification
Flaw identification is about pinpointing specific errors in an argument's reasoning. It involves spotting inconsistencies or contradictions that may undermine the logic of the argument. For this example: - The recognized flaw is the assumption that gasoline consumption will remain constant despite higher taxes, which is addressed in Option C's choice. - It’s important to understand how this flaw disrupts the argument's conclusion, leading to potentially unsound policy suggestions. By honing your ability to identify flaws: - You improve in evaluating the strength of conclusions drawn from the premises. - Become skilled at making logical connections that reliably lead to sound conclusions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Efficiency and redundancy are contradictory characteristics of linguistic systems; however, they can be used together to achieve usefulness and reliability in communication. If a spoken language is completely efficient, then every possible permutation of its basic language sounds can be an understandable word. However, if the human auditory system is an imperfect receptor of sounds, then it is not true that every possible permutation of a spoken language's basic tanguage sounds can be an understandable word. If all of the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true? (A) Efficiency causes a spoken language to be useful and redundancy causes it to be reliable. (B) Neither efficiency nor redundancy can be completely achieved in spoken language. (C) If a spoken language were completely redundant, then it could not be useful. (D) If the human auditory system were a perfect receptor of sounds, then every permutation of language sounds would be an understandable word. (E) If the human auditory system is an imperfect receptor of sounds, then a spoken language cannot be completely efficient.

"If the forest continues to disappear at its present pace, the koala will approach extinction," said the biologist. "So all that is needed to save the koala is to stop deforestation," said the politician. Which one of the following statements is consistent with the biologist's claim but not with the politician's claim? (A) Deforestation continues and the koala becomes extinct. (B) Deforestation is stopped and the koala becomes extinct. (C) Reforestation begins and the koala survives. (D) Deforestation is slowed and the koala survives. (E) Deforestation is slowed and the koala approaches extinction.

Which one of the following, if true, lends the most support to the automakers' current position? (A) The more stringent the legislation restricting emissions becomes, the more difficult it becomes for automakers to provide the required technology economically. (B) Emissions-restriction technology can often be engineered so as to avoid reducing the efficiency with which an automobile uses fuel. (C) Not every new piece of legislation restricting emissions requires new automotive technology in order for automakers to comply with it. (D) The more automobiles there are on the road, the more stringent emission restrictions must be to prevent increased overall air pollution. (E) Unless forced to do so by the government, automakers rarely make changes in automotive technology that is not related to profitability.

If retail stores experience a decrease in revenues during this holiday season, then either attitudes toward extravagant gift-giving have changed or prices have risen beyond the level most people can afford. If attitudes have changed, then we all have something to celebrate this season. If prices have risen beyond the level most people can afford. then it must be that salaries have not kept pace with rising prices during the past year. Assume the premises above to be true. If salaries have kept pace with rising prices during the past year, which one of the following must be true? (A) Attitudes toward extravagant gift-giving have changed. (B) Retail stores will not experience a decrease in retail sales during this holiday season. (C) Prices in retail stores have not risen beyond the level that most people can afford during this holiday season. (D) Attitudes toward extravagant gift-giving have not changed, and stores will not experience a decrease in revenues during this holiday season. (E) Either attitudes toward extravagant gift-giving have changed or prices have risen beyond the level that most people can afford during this holiday season.

Normal full-term babies are all born with certain instinctive reflexes that disappear by the age of two months. Because this three-month-old baby exhibits these reflexes, this baby is not a normal full-term baby. Which one of the following has a logical structure most like that of the argument above? (A) Because carbon dioxide tums limewater milky and this gas is oxygen, it will not turn limewater milky. (B) Because no ape can talk and Suzy is an ape, Suzy cannot talk. (C) Because humans are social animals and Henry is sociable, Henry is normal. (D) Because opossums have abdominal pouches and this animal lacks any such pouch, this animal is not an opossum. (E) Because some types of trees shed their leaves annually and this tree has not shed its leaves, it is not normal.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free