Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Which one of the following, if true, lends the most support to the automakers' current position? (A) The more stringent the legislation restricting emissions becomes, the more difficult it becomes for automakers to provide the required technology economically. (B) Emissions-restriction technology can often be engineered so as to avoid reducing the efficiency with which an automobile uses fuel. (C) Not every new piece of legislation restricting emissions requires new automotive technology in order for automakers to comply with it. (D) The more automobiles there are on the road, the more stringent emission restrictions must be to prevent increased overall air pollution. (E) Unless forced to do so by the government, automakers rarely make changes in automotive technology that is not related to profitability.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option (A) best supports the automakers' position by highlighting economic challenges with stricter emission restrictions.

Step by step solution

01

Identify Automakers' Position

The automakers' current position is that they are opposed to more stringent legislative restrictions on emissions. They likely argue that increased restrictions might have negative implications for them or increase manufacturing challenges.
02

Connect Each Option to Automakers' Position

Evaluate how each statement might support the automakers' position. - **(A):** This suggests increased regulation makes it harder for automakers economically. - **(B):** This suggests emissions technology can still maintain fuel efficiency. - **(C):** This implies not all emissions laws burden automakers with extra tech needs. - **(D):** Suggests higher emission numbers require stricter laws, affecting production. - **(E):** Shows automakers make tech changes only if profitable.
03

Analyze Option A

Statement (A) states that when emission restrictions become more stringent, it becomes difficult for automakers to provide the necessary technology economically. This directly supports the automakers' argument by highlighting economic difficulty and technological challenges that come with stricter regulations.
04

Analyze Option B

Statement (B) suggests that emission-control technologies do not necessarily affect fuel efficiency, which doesn't directly support the automakers' concern about the economic impact of stringent laws.
05

Analyze Option C

Statement (C) suggests that not all legislative changes require new technology. While this may be true, it doesn’t directly support the automakers' opposition to current or potential legislation.
06

Analyze Option D

Statement (D) suggests a need for more stringent laws depending on the number of vehicles. While it discusses the context of emission laws, it doesn't address automakers' concerns about technology or economic demands.
07

Analyze Option E

Statement (E) highlights automakers' reluctance to innovate unless it's profitable. This reflects internal motivators rather than supporting their external argument against stringent emissions legislation.
08

Determine Best Support

Option (A) is the best support for the automakers' position. It indicates that stricter emission laws directly increase economic and technological challenges for automakers, aligning with their opposition to the legislation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

logical reasoning
Logical reasoning involves using structured thinking to make sense of various arguments or statements. In the context of exam preparations, such as the LSAT, it's crucial to evaluate options that strengthen or weaken a given argument. To practice logical reasoning, one should:
  • Identify the main argument or claim made by the speaker.
  • Understand the assumptions that underpin the argument.
  • Assess alternative views or evidence that could affect the argument's strength.

For example, in a question about legislative impact on automakers, one must think about how each option might affect their argument regarding stricter emission laws. Logical reasoning allows one to systematically and carefully understand how different pieces of evidence contribute to or detract from a given claim.
argument analysis
Argument analysis is about breaking down an argument into its core components and understanding the interaction between these elements. It is a key skill for the LSAT and can help clarify how well an argument holds based on the given evidence. Key steps include:
  • Identifying the conclusion - what is the speaker trying to prove?
  • Noting the premises - what evidence or statements are presented to support the conclusion?
  • Understanding the relationship between premises and conclusion - does the evidence logically lead to the conclusion?

In the context of the given problem, the conclusions: automakers' opposition to stringent legislative restrictions, would benefit from close argument analysis. By examining each statement option, we evaluate how effectively each one reinforces the automakers' stance. The process helps to surface which piece of evidence, or lack thereof, strengthens their position against the restrictions.
critical thinking
Critical thinking is a higher-level cognitive skill used to evaluate and analyze information in a rational way to form a judgment. This skill is essential in LSAT preparation as it requires an individual to go beyond surface-level understanding. Here’s how you can nurture your critical thinking skills:
  • Question underlying assumptions - are there biases or assumptions that are not directly stated?
  • Look for inconsistencies or contradictions in statements or arguments.
  • Consider the implications - if something is true, what follows?

When analyzing the automakers' position on stricter legislation, one must critically assess each choice to determine how well it substantiates or questions their claims. Does a particular choice imply a challenge or an economic burden? Critical thinkers also consider broader consequences, like how a decision affects other stakeholders or future legislation.
legislation impact
Understanding legislation impact involves recognizing how changes in laws affect stakeholders such as businesses, individuals, and the environment. In arguing about emissions legislation, one needs to identify these impacts to shape strong arguments either for or against the changes. Considerations include:
  • Economic impact - how do legislative changes affect economic performance or financial strain?
  • Technological requirements - what innovations or adaptations are needed to meet new standards?
  • Environmental outcomes - how effective are the regulations in protecting or improving the environment?
  • Social effects - how do these changes affect society at large?

Analyzing the impact of legislation on automakers requires understanding their claim about difficulties imposed by new emission laws. It means assessing how these laws impact economic viability, available technology, and the environmental benefits intended by these regulations. Drawing comprehensive connections between legislation and its effects sharpens your ability to evaluate arguments critically.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

One method of dating the emergence of species is to compare the genetic material of related species. Scientists theorize that the more genetically similar two species are to each other, the more recently they diverged from a common ancestor. After comparing genetic material from giant pandas, red pandas, raccoons, coatis, and all seven bear species, scientists concluded that bears and raccoons diverged 30 to 50 million years ago. They further concluded that red pandas separated from the ancestor of today's raccoons and coatis a few million years later, some 10 million years before giant pandas diverged from the other bears. Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the passage? (A) Giant pandas and red pandas are more closely related than scientists originally thought they were. (B) Scientists now count the giant panda as the eighth species of bear. (C) It is possible to determine, within a margin of just a few years, the timing of divergence of various species. (D) Scientists have found that giant pandas are more similar genetically to bears than to raccoons. (E) There is substantial consensus among scientists that giant pandas and red pandas are equally related to raccoons.

Even if a crime that has been committed by computer is discovered and reported, the odds of being both arrested and convicted greatly favor the criminal. Each of the following, if true, supports the claim above EXCEPT: (A) The preparation of computer-fraud cases takes much more time than is required for average fraud cases, and the productivity of prosecutors is evaluated by the number of good cases made. (B) In most police departments, officers are rotated through different assignments every two or three years, a shorter time than it takes to become proficient as a computer-crime investigator. (C) The priorities of loeal police departments, under whose jurisdiction most computer crime falls. are weighted toward visible street crime that communities perceive as threatening- (D) Computer criminals have rarely been sentenced to serve time in prison, because prisons are overcrowded with violent criminals and drug offenders. (E) The many police officers who are untrained in computers often inadvertently destroy the physical evidence of computer crime.

As symbols of the freedom of the wilderness, bald eagles have the unique capacity to inspire people and foster in them a sympathetic attitude toward the needs of other threatened species. Clearly, without that sympathy and the political will it engenders, the needs of more obscure species will go unmet. The conservation needs of many obscure species can only be met by beginning with the conservation of this symbolic species, the bald eagle. Which one of the following is the main point of the passage as a whole? (A) Because bald eagles symbolize freedom, conservation efforts should be concentrated on them rather than on other, more obscure species. (B) The conservation of bald eagles is the first necessary step in conserving other endangered species. (C) Without increased public sympathy for conservation, the needs of many symbolic species will go unmet. (D) People's love of the wilderness can be used to engender political support for conservation efforts. (E) Other threatened species do not inspire people or foster sympathy as much as do bald eagles.

Leaming how to build a nest plays an important part in the breeding success of birds. For example, Dr. Snow has recorded the success of a number of blackbirds in several successive years. He finds that birds nesting for the first time are less successful in breeding than are older birds, and also less successful than they themselves are a year later. This cannot be a mere matter of size and strength, since blackbirds, like the great majority of birds, are fully grown when they leave the nest. It is difficult to avoid the conclusion that they benefit by their nesting experience. Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument? (A) Blackbirds build better nests than other birds. (B) The capacity of blackbirds to lay viable eggs increases with each successive trial during the first few years of reproduction. (C) The breeding success of birds nesting for the second time is greater than that of birds nesting for the first time. (D) Smaller and weaker blackbirds breed just as suecessfully as bigger and stronger blackbirds. (E) Up to 25 percent of all birds are killed by predators before they start to nest.

The "suicide wave" that followed the United States stock market crash of October 1929 is more legend than fact. Careful examination of the monthly fugures on the causes of death in 1929 show that the number of suicides in October and in November was comparatively low. In only three other months were the monthly figures lower. During the summer months, when the stock market was flourishing, the number of suicides was substantially higher. Which one of the following, if true, would best challenge the conclusion of the passage? (A) The suicide rate is influenced by many psychological, interpersonal, and socictal factors during any given historical period. (B) October and November have almost always had relatively high suicide rates, even during the 1920 s and 1930 s. (C) The suicide rate in October and November of 1929 was considerably higher than the average for those months during several preceding and following years. (D) During the years surrounding the stock market crash, suicide rates were typically lower at the beginning of any calendar year than toward the end of that year. (E) Because of seasonal differences, the number of suicides in October and November of 1929 would not be expected to be the same as those for other months.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free