Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Normal full-term babies are all born with certain instinctive reflexes that disappear by the age of two months. Because this three-month-old baby exhibits these reflexes, this baby is not a normal full-term baby. Which one of the following has a logical structure most like that of the argument above? (A) Because carbon dioxide tums limewater milky and this gas is oxygen, it will not turn limewater milky. (B) Because no ape can talk and Suzy is an ape, Suzy cannot talk. (C) Because humans are social animals and Henry is sociable, Henry is normal. (D) Because opossums have abdominal pouches and this animal lacks any such pouch, this animal is not an opossum. (E) Because some types of trees shed their leaves annually and this tree has not shed its leaves, it is not normal.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The argument in option (D) matches the original argument's logical structure.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Argument Structure

The original argument states that if a normal condition disappears by a certain time (reflexes in full-term babies by two months), and the condition persists beyond that time (three-month-old baby still has reflexes), then the subject must not belong to the normal category (not a normal full-term baby). This can be summarized as: If a trait disappears by age x in normal category, and subject exhibits trait past age x, then subject is not in the normal category.
02

Analyze Each Option

We will break down each option to see if it follows the same logical structure as the original argument. - (A) If limewater turns milky with carbon dioxide and this is oxygen, it will not turn milky. This does not match as it discusses different outcomes, not category belonging based on trait persistence. - (B) Apes cannot talk, and if Suzy is an ape, she cannot talk. This presents a different structure, as it doesn't concern a trait disappearing or persisting past a normal point. - (C) Humans are social animals, and since Henry is sociable, he is normal. Again, this relates to category based on traits but does not involve persistence past a time frame. - (D) Opossums have pouches, and if this animal does not have a pouch, it is not an opossum. This matches as it concerns a defining trait that, if absent, means the subject is not in the normal category described. - (E) Since some trees shed leaves and this tree hasn't, it's not normal. Relates to a lack of a trait being a sign of not normalcy, not quite matching as it doesn't involve all entities of a category (only 'some').
03

Determine the Correct Answer

Option (D) matches the structure most closely. It speaks to an expected characteristic (having a pouch) and concludes that lacking this characteristic means being outside the defined category (not an opossum). This aligns with the original argument about persistence of traits ruling out normalcy.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Argument Structure
In logical reasoning, understanding the argument structure is crucial, especially when preparing for exams like the LSAT. The argument structure refers to the underlying framework that supports a particular argument.
In the original exercise, the argument is structured around the concept of trait persistence and category classification.
Key points of this argument structure include:
  • Identifying a normal condition, such as instinctive reflexes disappearing by a certain age in full-term babies.
  • Observing whether this condition persists beyond the expected time frame.
  • Drawing a conclusion about belonging to a category based on this observation.
The step-by-step breakdown involves analyzing whether the given conditions logically lead to the conclusion that a subject is not a part of the normal category if the traits persist past the usual cut-off point.
Logical Reasoning
Logical reasoning is the ability to analyze arguments and assertions in a clear, objective manner.
When tackling LSAT Logical Reasoning questions, it's important to evaluate how premises lead to a conclusion. In this problem, the logical reasoning involves recognizing that the persistence of certain traits beyond the typical time frame contradicts the expected norms.
This is a signature of evaluating conditions and implications logically. Some helpful approaches include:
  • Identifying premises and conclusions to see how they relate.
  • Checking if the assumption holds true in all cases.
  • Watching for similar patterns or deviations in other arguments.
These skills allow you to dissect the argument properly and find the most logically similar argument from the options presented.
Deductive Reasoning
Deductive reasoning is about drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises.
In the context of the exercise, you are required to use deductive reasoning to determine if a subject fits into a category. Here's how to approach it:
  • Start with a general rule, like reflexes disappearing by a set age for normal babies.
  • Check if the individual case meets the conditions of this rule.
  • If not, deduce that the case does not fit the general rule.
The exercise uses deductive reasoning to conclude that a baby with persistent reflexes isn’t typical because it doesn’t align with the general rule for normal babies.
Understanding this type of reasoning can enhance decision-making in logical problems.
Standardized Test Preparation
Preparing for standardized tests, like the LSAT, involves mastering various test components, including logical reasoning.
Familiarity with argument types and structures can make a significant difference. Key preparation strategies include:
  • Practice with sample questions to become comfortable with different logical structures.
  • Develop a systematic approach to analyzing arguments, identifying premises, and drawing conclusions.
  • Learn to recognize common logical fallacies and assumptions that could mislead conclusions.
By focusing on these areas, students can improve their test performance.
It’s beneficial to review argument structures and formats regularly to build confidence in answering such questions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Although this bottle is labeled "vinegar," no fizzing occurred when some of the liquid in it was added to powder from this box labeled "baking soda." But when an acidic liquid such as vinegar is added to baking soda the resulting mixture fizzes, so this bottle clearly has been mislabeled. A flaw in the reasoning in the argument above is that this argument (A) ignores the possibility that the bottle contained an acidic liquid other than vinegar (B) fails to exclude an altemative explanation for the observed effect (C) depends on the use of the imprecise term "fizz" (D) does not take into account the fact that scientific principles can be definitively tested only under controlled laboratory conditions (E) assumes that the fact of a labeling error is proof of an intention to deceive

Alice: Quotas on automobile imports to the United States should be eliminated. Then domestic producers would have to compete directly with Japanese manufacturers and would be forced to produce higher-quality cars. Such competition would be good for consumers. David: You fail to realize, Alice, that quotas on automobile imports are pervasive worldwide. Since Germany, Britain, and France have quotas, so should the United States. Which one of the following most accurately characterizes David's response to Alice's statement? (A) David falsely accuses Alice of contradicting herself. (B) David unfairly directs his argument against Alice personally. (C) David uncovers a hidden assumption underlying Alice's position. (D) David takes a position that is similar to the one Alice has taken. (E) David fails to address the reasons Alice cites in favor of her conclusion.

Assume that a person who lives in a small, wellinsulated house that contains toxin-releasing products places houseplants, such as those tested, in the house. Which one of the following can be expected as a result? (A) There will no longer be any need to ventilate the house. (B) The concentration of toxins in the household air supply will remain the same. (C) The house will be warm and have a safe air supply. (D) If there is formaldehyde in the household air supply, its level will decrease. (E) If formaldehyde and benzene are being released into the household air supply, the quantities released of each will decrease.

All savings accounts are interest-bearing accounts. The interest from some interest-bearing accounts is tax-free, so there must be some savings accounts that have taxfree interest. Which one of the following arguments is flawed in a way most similar to the way in which the passage is flawed? (A) All artists are intellectuals. Some great photographers are artists. Therefore, some great photographers must be intellectuals. (B) All great photographers are artists. All artists are intellectuals. Therefore, some great photographers must be intellectuals. (C) All great photographers are artists. Some artists are intellectuals. Therefore, some great photographers are intellectuals. (D) All great photographers are artists. Some great photographers are intellectuals. Therefore, some artists must be intellectuals. (E) All great photographers are artists. No artists are intellectuals. Therefore, some great photographers must not be intellectuals.

Marine biologists have long thought that variation in the shell color of aquatic snails evolved as protective camouflage against birds and other predators. Brown shells seem to be more frequent when the underlying seafloor is dark-colored and white shells more frequent when the underlying seafloor is light-colored. A new theory has been advanced, however, that claims that shell color is related to physiological stress associated with heat absorption. According to this theory, brown shells will be more prevalent in areas where the wave action of the sea is great and thus heat absorption from the Sun is minimized, whereas white shells will be more numerous in calmer waters, where the snails will absorb more heat from the Sun's rays. Evidence that would strongly favor the new theory over the traditional theory would be the discovery of a large majority of (A) dark-shelled snails in a calm inlet with a dark, rocky bottom and many predators (B) dark-shelled snails in a calm inlet with a white, sandy bottom (C) light-shelled snails in an inlet with much wave action and a dark, rocky bottom (D) light-shelled snails in a calm inlet with a dark, rocky bottom and many predators (E) light-shelled snails in a calm inlet with a white, sandy bottom and many predators

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free