Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Leaming how to build a nest plays an important part in the breeding success of birds. For example, Dr. Snow has recorded the success of a number of blackbirds in several successive years. He finds that birds nesting for the first time are less successful in breeding than are older birds, and also less successful than they themselves are a year later. This cannot be a mere matter of size and strength, since blackbirds, like the great majority of birds, are fully grown when they leave the nest. It is difficult to avoid the conclusion that they benefit by their nesting experience. Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument? (A) Blackbirds build better nests than other birds. (B) The capacity of blackbirds to lay viable eggs increases with each successive trial during the first few years of reproduction. (C) The breeding success of birds nesting for the second time is greater than that of birds nesting for the first time. (D) Smaller and weaker blackbirds breed just as suecessfully as bigger and stronger blackbirds. (E) Up to 25 percent of all birds are killed by predators before they start to nest.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option (B) weakens the argument by suggesting an alternative reason for improved breeding success.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Argument

The argument claims that learning to build a nest is crucial to the breeding success because first-time nesters are less successful than those with experience, implying experience, not physical development, improves breeding success.
02

Look for the Weakening Evidence

You need evidence that suggests factors other than nesting experience could be responsible for improved breeding success in subsequent years and not merely the experience of building nests.
03

Analyze Each Option

- **(A)** states blackbirds build better nests than other birds, which doesn't directly address the reasoning of the argument. - **(B)** suggests the capacity to lay viable eggs increases with successive tries, providing an alternative reason for breeding success that isn't related to nesting experience. - **(C)** restates part of the argument, supporting not weakening it. - **(D)** supports the argument by showing size isn't affecting success, aligning with the argument. - **(E)** mentions predation rates not directly related to the argument's claims.
04

Identify the Most Weakening Option

Option (B) directly challenges the argument by providing a biological reason—improved egg viability—explaining the improved success rate not related to nesting experience.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Argument Analysis
Argument analysis involves dissecting a statement or a series of statements to understand the core conclusion and the evidence presented to support it. In this exercise, the argument is about the nesting success of blackbirds. The conclusion drawn is that birds improve their breeding success due to the learning or experience they gain from previous nesting attempts, not from physical changes. To analyze this argument, identify two main components:
  • Conclusion: Experience in nesting leads to improved breeding success.
  • Premises: First-time nesters are less successful than in subsequent attempts; birds are fully grown physically when leaving the nest.
The goal of argument analysis is to determine whether the conclusion logically follows from the premises provided. By doing so, one can evaluate the strength and validity of the argument. If you identify assumptions or notice missing information, these become crucial points in critical evaluation.
Critical Thinking
Critical thinking is essential when evaluating an argument, allowing you to discern between strong and flawed conclusions. It requires analyzing the argument beyond face value and asking whether the argument is logically sound. In this context, consider:
  • The assumptions: The argument assumes that experience is the only factor affecting breeding success.
  • Alternative explanations: Are there other factors, like egg viability or learning from trial and error, that might contribute to success?
  • Evidence evaluation: Is the evidence provided adequate and relevant to support the conclusion?
Critical thinking involves questioning each piece of the argument and its evidential link. It's about not taking things at face value, checking biases, and ensuring every claim is backed by appropriate logic or evidence.
Logical Reasoning Questions
Logical reasoning questions test your ability to understand and evaluate arguments similar to those found in the LSAT. Such questions require you to identify, strengthen, weaken, or draw parallels from given statements to ensure a deep comprehension of logical principles at play. To tackle logical reasoning questions effectively:
  • Identify conclusions and premises: Clarifying these helps locate the argument's foundation.
  • Consider counterexamples or alternative scenarios: Examine options that might offer different explanations or contradict the argument's premises.
  • Analyze options methodically: Understand each possible answer, asking how it fits or contests the argument structure.
Logical reasoning questions demand clear, concise thinking. Practice recognizing patterns, strengthening your comprehension, and questioning assumptions to excel in these types of queries.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In a large residential building, there is a rule that no pets are allowed. A group of pet lovers tried to change that rule but failed. The rule-changing procedure outlined in the building's regulations states that only if a group of tenants can obtain the signatures of 10 percent of the tenants on a petition to change a rule will the proposed change be put to a majority vote of all the tenants in the building. It follows that the pet lovers were voted down on their proposal by the majority of the tenants. The argument depends on which one of the following assumptions? (A) The pet lovers succeeded in obtaining the signatures of 10 percent of the tenants on their petition. (B) The signatures of less than 10 percent of the tenants were obtained on the pet lovers' petition. (C) Ninety percent of the tenants are against changing the rule forbidding pets. (D) The support of 10 percent of the tenants for a rule change ensures that the rule change will be adopted. (E) The failure of the pet lovers to obtain the signatures of 10 percent of the tenants on their petition for a rule change ensures that the rule change will be voted down by a majority of the tenants.

Governments have only one response to public criticism of socially necessary services: regulation of the activity of providing those services. But governments inevitably make the activity more expensive by regulating it, and that is particularly troublesome in these times of strained financial resources. However, since public criticism of childcare services has undermined all confidence in such services, and since such services are socially necessary, the government is certain to respond. Which one of the following statements can be inferred from the passage? (A) The quality of child care will improve. (B) The cost of providing child-care services will increase. (C) The government will use funding to foster advances in child care. (D) If public criticism of policy is strongly voiced, the government is certain to respond. (E) If child-care services are not regulated, the cost of providing child care will not increase.

Although this bottle is labeled "vinegar," no fizzing occurred when some of the liquid in it was added to powder from this box labeled "baking soda." But when an acidic liquid such as vinegar is added to baking soda the resulting mixture fizzes, so this bottle clearly has been mislabeled. A flaw in the reasoning in the argument above is that this argument (A) ignores the possibility that the bottle contained an acidic liquid other than vinegar (B) fails to exclude an altemative explanation for the observed effect (C) depends on the use of the imprecise term "fizz" (D) does not take into account the fact that scientific principles can be definitively tested only under controlled laboratory conditions (E) assumes that the fact of a labeling error is proof of an intention to deceive

Nuclear fusion is a process whereby the nuclei of atoms are jouned, or "tused," and in which energy is released. One of the by-products of fusion is helium \(-4\) gas. A recent fusion experiment was conducted using "heavy" water contained in a sealed flask. The flask was, in turn, contained in an air- filled chamber designed to eliminate extraneous vibration. After the experiment, a measurable amount of helium-4 gas was found in the air of the chamber. The experimenters cited this evidence in support of their conclusion that fusion had been achieved. Which one of the following, if true, would cast doubt on the experimenters' conclusion? (A) Helium-4 was not the only gas found in the experiment chamber. (B) When fusion is achieved, it normally produces several by-products, including tritium and gamma rays. (C) The amount of helium-4 found in the chamber's air did not exceed the amount of helium-4 that is found in ordinary air. (D) Helium-4 gas rapidly breaks down, forming ordinary helium gas after a few hours. (E) Nuclear fusion reactions are characterized by the release of large amounts of heat.

All savings accounts are interest-bearing accounts. The interest from some interest-bearing accounts is tax-free, so there must be some savings accounts that have taxfree interest. Which one of the following arguments is flawed in a way most similar to the way in which the passage is flawed? (A) All artists are intellectuals. Some great photographers are artists. Therefore, some great photographers must be intellectuals. (B) All great photographers are artists. All artists are intellectuals. Therefore, some great photographers must be intellectuals. (C) All great photographers are artists. Some artists are intellectuals. Therefore, some great photographers are intellectuals. (D) All great photographers are artists. Some great photographers are intellectuals. Therefore, some artists must be intellectuals. (E) All great photographers are artists. No artists are intellectuals. Therefore, some great photographers must not be intellectuals.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free