Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Which one of the following arguments can be used to support one of the most used reasons for children's retention of the father's name-preservation of the parent-child relationship? A. Either parent will maintain contact regardless of the child's last name. B. A system capable of dealing with name changes of divorced mothers ought to be able to deal as well with children's name changes. C. A bureaucratic convenience should not be set above preserving the parent- child relationship. D. A father is less likely to maintain contact with a child whose name differs from his own. E. A mother is less likely to maintain contact with a child whose name differs from her own.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The argument that supports the most used reason for children's retention of the father's name for preserving the parent-child relationship is Statement D. This statement directly suggests that a father is more likely to maintain contact with a child having his name, thereby implying a preserved parent-child relationship.

Step by step solution

01

Analysis of Statement A

Statement A suggests that either parent will maintain contact with the child regardless of the child's last name. The last name does not impact the parent-child relationship according to this statement, and hence it does not specifically support the reason for children retaining their father's last name to preserve the parent-child relationship.
02

Analysis of Statement B

Statement B comments on the capabilities of a system that manages name changes post-divorce. This does not directly support the reason of name-preservation for the sake of the parent-child relationship. Instead, it talks about the logistical capabilities of coping with name changes.
03

Analysis of Statement C

Statement C emphasizes that a bureaucratic convenience (likely referring to the ease of paperwork and legalities with name retention) should not eclipse the importance of preserving the parent-child relationship. However, it doesn't specify the father's name retention as the means to preserve this relationship.
04

Analysis of Statement D

Statement D directly suggests that a father is less likely to maintain contact with a child whose name differs from his own. This implies that if a child retains their father's name, the father is more likely to maintain contact, thereby preserving the parent-child relationship, which directly supports the given reason for children's retention of the father's name.
05

Analysis of Statement E

Statement E suggests that a mother is less likely to maintain contact with a child whose name differs from her own. This is not directly supporting the father's name preservation as the means to keep the parent-child relationship.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In England in 1880, the Roman Catholic father of a child born of a Baptist mother would probably have been legally allowed to do all of the following EXCEPT: A. ignore the child's religious education. B. bring up the child as a Roman Catholic. C. bring up the child as a Baptist. D. make sure that the child was brought up very religiously. E. abrogate his authority without reason.

Don't spend the night tossing and turning! Take Eezy-Z's for a sound, restful sleep ... you'll wake up refreshed, energized, with no druggedup hangover. Remember ... Eezy-Z's when you need that sleep! Which of the following is NOT a claim of Eezy-Z's? A. A good night's sleep B. Added energy C. No aftereffects D. Quickly falling asleep E. A restful slumber

A legal decision supporting the religious preference of a father over that of a mother might be defended plausibly by arguing that A. a father has the right to educate his children in any religion he chooses. B. a father does not have the right to choose the religion of his children. C. a father's religious preference may be supported constitutionally as long as one religion is not preferred. D. the courts are reluctant to intervene in cases involving children's religious rights. E. the courts are reluctant to intervene in cases involving the conflict of two different religions.

The argument that a child of divorced parents by keeping the parental name may be given a "healthy sense of family" (line 38), "ethnic and religious identity" (lines 38-39), and a "rightful link with an absent ... father" (line 40) is based upon all of the following doubtful assumptions EXCEPT: A. Ethnic identity is determined by the father. B. Religious identity is determined by the father. C. Record keeping systems cannot handle changes of names. D. A father's name gives a sense of family. E. A link to an absent father should be maintained.

The author's statement might be weakened by pointing out that A. eight hours of sleep is a cultural, not a physical, requirement. B. the most capable people rarely sleep. C. rest is a positive contribution to knowledge and capability. D. young children enjoy themselves less than knowledgeable adults. E. people rarely waste time during their waking hours.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free