Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Large angle scattering of \(\alpha-\) particle could not be explained by (A) Thomson model (B) Rutherford model (C) Both Thomson and Rutherford model (D) neither Thomson nor Rutherford model

Short Answer

Expert verified
The large angle scattering of alpha particles could not be explained by the Thomson model (A), in which electrons are dispersed evenly throughout the atom's volume. This model doesn't predict significant deflections due to the lack of centrally concentrated positive charge. On the other hand, Rutherford's model, with a dense, positively charged nucleus, does predict large deflections and is supported by experimental evidence.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Thomson's Model

In the Thomson model of the atom, the electrons are dispersed evenly throughout the atom's volume, nicknamed as the "plum pudding model". According to this model, positively charged alpha particles would pass through the uniformly charged negatively charged "cloud" of electrons with only little deflections due to the slight repulsions or attractions by the electrons' negative charges.
02

Understand Rutherford's Model

In the Rutherford model, also known as the Planetary model, the atom consists of a dense, positively charged nucleus surrounded by electrons in orbits. According to this model, the alpha particles could pass close to the nucleus, altering their path dramatically due to the intense electrostatic repulsion between the positively charged alpha particles and the positively charged nucleus.
03

Determine which model cannot explain large angle scattering

In Thomson's model, significant large-angle scattering of alpha particles would not be expected because there is no centrally concentrated positive charge to cause large deflection. In contrast, Rutherford's model does predict large angle deflections if alpha particles pass near the atom's nucleus. Experiments, such as Rutherford's gold foil experiment, have proven large angle scattering to be real, thereby validating Rutherford's model and invalidating Thomson's model concerning large angle scattering.
04

Select the correct answer

Based on the analysis above, Thomson's model could not explain large angle scattering of alpha particles. Therefore, the correct answer is: (A) Thomson model

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The wave length of the first line of Lyman series for hydrogen atom is equal to that of hydrogen atom is equal to that of second line of Balmar series for a hydrogen like ion. The atomic number \(\mathrm{Z}\) of hydrogen like ion is (A) 1 (B) 2 (C) 3 (D) 4

The size of the nucleus is of the order of (A) \(10^{-10} \mathrm{~m}\) (B) \(10^{-14} \mathrm{~m}\) (C) \(10^{-19} \mathrm{~m}\) (D) \(10^{-3} \mathrm{~m}\)

A radioactive sample has \(\mathrm{n}_{0}\) active atom at \(\mathrm{t}=\mathrm{o}\), at the rate of disintegration at any time is \(\mathrm{R}\) and the number of atom is \(\mathrm{N}\), then ratio. $(\mathrm{R} / \mathrm{N})\( varies with time \)(\mathrm{t})$ as.

(i) statement-I :- Large angle scattering of alpha Particle led to discovery of atomic nucleus. statement-II :- Entire Positive charge of atom is concentrated in the central core. (A) statement -I and II are true. and statement II is correct explanation of statement-I (B) statement -I and II are true, but statement-II is not correct explanation of statement I (C) statement I is true, but statement II is false. (D) statement I is false but statement II is true (ii) statement-I \(1 \mathrm{amu}=931.48 \mathrm{MeV}\) statement-II It follows form \(E=m c^{2}\) (iii) statement -I:- half life time of tritium is \(12.5\) years statement-II:- The fraction of tritium that remains after 50 years is \(6.25 \%\) (iv) statement-I:- Nuclei of different atoms have same size statement-II:- \(\mathrm{R}=\operatorname{Ro}(\mathrm{A})^{1 / 3}\)

In the following nuclear fusion reaction ${ }_{1}^{2} \mathrm{H}+{ }_{1}^{3} \mathrm{H} \rightarrow{ }_{2}^{4} \mathrm{He}+{ }_{0} \mathrm{n}^{1}$ the repulsive potential energy between the two fusing nuclei is $7.7 \times 10^{-14} \mathrm{~J}$. The Temperature to which the gas must be heated is nearly (Boltzman constant \(\mathrm{K}=1.38 \times 10^{-23} \mathrm{JK}^{-1}\) ) (A) \(10^{3} \mathrm{~K}\) (B) \(10^{5} \mathrm{~K}\) (C) \(10^{7} \mathrm{~K}\) (D) \(10^{9} \mathrm{~K}\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free