Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

For the electrons of oxygen atom, which of the following statements is correct? (1) \(Z_{\text {ett }}\) for an electron in a 2s orbital is the same as \(Z_{\text {eft }}\) for an electron in a 2p orbital. (2) An electron in the 2 s orbital has the same energy as an electron in the \(2 p\) orbital. (3) \(\mathrm{Z}_{\mathrm{efl}}\) for an electron in a 1 s orbital is the same as \(Z_{\text {etf }}\) for an electron in a 2 s orbital. (4) The two electrons present in the 2 s orbital have different spin quantum numbers \(\left(m_{s}\right)\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
Statement 4 is correct.

Step by step solution

01

Find the Effective Nuclear Charge (Z_eff)

The effective nuclear charge, denoted as \(Z_\text{eff}\), is the net positive charge experienced by an electron in an atom. It can be different for electrons in different orbitals due to electron shielding.
02

Evaluate Statement 1

Statement 1 claims that \(Z_\text{eff}\) for an electron in a 2s orbital is the same as for one in a 2p orbital. While both orbitals are in the same energy level (n=2), the 2s electron often experiences a slightly different \(Z_\text{eff}\) due to differences in penetration and shielding effects. Thus, the effective nuclear charges are usually not exactly the same.
03

Evaluate Statement 2

Statement 2 asserts that an electron in the 2s orbital has the same energy as one in the 2p orbital. This statement is incorrect because 2s electrons are typically lower in energy compared to 2p electrons in the same atom. This is due to better shielding and closer penetration to the nucleus by the 2s electrons.
04

Evaluate Statement 3

Statement 3 suggests that \(Z_\text{eff}\) for an electron in a 1s orbital is the same as for one in a 2s orbital. This is incorrect because electrons in the 1s orbital experience a higher effective nuclear charge compared to those in the 2s orbital due to the former being closer to the nucleus with less shielding effects.
05

Evaluate Statement 4

Statement 4 proposes that the two electrons present in the 2s orbital have different spin quantum numbers (\(m_{s}\)). This is correct because spin quantum numbers can be either \(+\frac{1}{2}\) or \(-\frac{1}{2}\), and no two electrons in the same orbital can share the same set of quantum numbers.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Effective Nuclear Charge (Z_eff)
The Effective Nuclear Charge, often symbolized as \(Z_\text{eff}\), represents the net positive charge that an electron experiences within an atom. This concept is crucial for understanding electron interactions and overall atomic structure.
The nucleus is composed of positively charged protons. However, in a multi-electron atom, electrons repel each other. Outer electrons are less attracted to the nucleus compared to inner electrons because outer electrons experience a shielding effect.
The shielding effect is the reduction in the effective nuclear charge by the inner-shell electrons. Inner-shell electrons block some of the positive charge from reaching the outer electrons.
Thus, outer electrons experience a net positive charge that is less than the actual charge of the nucleus, and we call this the Effective Nuclear Charge. The formula often used to estimate it is:
\[ Z_{\text{eff}} = Z - S \]where:
  • \(Z\) is the total number of protons, or the actual nuclear charge
  • \(S\) is the average number of electrons between the nucleus and the electron in question, or the shielding constant

Electrons in different orbitals will experience different effective nuclear charges due to variations in their shielding and penetration capabilities.
Electron orbitals
Electron orbitals describe regions in an atom where electrons are likely to be found. These regions differ based on energy levels and shapes.
Each orbital can hold a specific number of electrons and has a unique shape and orientation.
Orbitals are organized into different shells (energy levels), with each shell containing one or more subshells: s, p, d, and f. Here are some key points to understand:
  • **1s orbital:** Spherical and closest to the nucleus. Holds up to 2 electrons.
  • **2s orbital:** Also spherical but larger in size. Holds up to 2 electrons in the second energy level.
  • **2p orbitals:** Dumbbell-shaped and oriented in three directions (x, y, z). Each can hold up to 2 electrons, for a total of 6 across the three orbitals in the second energy level.

While 2s and 2p orbitals are in the same energy level (n=2), they differ in energy due to their shapes and orientations. 2s is typically lower in energy because it penetrates closer to the nucleus, experiencing less shielding compared to 2p orbitals.
The rules of orbital filling follow specific principles:
  • **Aufbau Principle:** Orbitals are filled from lowest to highest energy levels.
  • **Pauli Exclusion Principle:** No two electrons can have the same set of quantum numbers within an atom.
  • **Hund’s Rule:** Electrons will fill degenerate orbitals (same energy) singly before pairing up.

These principles help describe the electron configuration and the probable locations and energies of an atom’s electrons.
Spin quantum numbers
The spin quantum number, symbolized as \(m_{s}\), is a quantum number that describes the intrinsic angular momentum (also known as spin) of an electron within an orbital.
Unlike other quantum numbers (n, l, ml), which describe the spatial distribution and energy of an electron’s orbit, the spin quantum number specifies the direction of an electron’s spin.
The spin quantum number can have only one of two possible values:
  • \( +\frac{1}{2} \) – Called 'spin up'
  • \( -\frac{1}{2} \) – Called 'spin down'

This concept is vital because of the Pauli Exclusion Principle, which states that no two electrons in the same atom can have the same set of four quantum numbers (n, l, ml, and \(m_{s}\)).
As a result, if an orbital holds two electrons, their spins must be opposite to comply with this principle. This explains why electrons in a fully-occupied orbital have opposite spins. For instance, if one electron in the 2s orbital has a spin quantum number \( +\frac{1}{2} \), the other must have \( -\frac{1}{2} \).
This balanced spinning creates a paired state, stabilizing the atom and contributing to the magnetic properties of the material.
In summary, understanding spin quantum numbers helps in comprehending electron configurations and the physical properties of elements.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Statement-1: Centre of gravity and centre of mass have same physical meaning. Statement-2 : In uniform gravitational field, centre of mass and centre of gravity are at the same point. (1) Statement-1 is True, Statement-2 is True; Statement-2 is a correct explanation for Statement- \(-1\). (2) Statement-1 is True, Statement-2 is True; Statement-2 is NOT a correct explanation for Statement-1 (3) Statement-1 is True, Statement-2 is False (4) Statement-1 is False, Statement-2 is True

In a damped oscillator the amplitude of vibrations of mass \(\mathrm{m}=150\) grams falls by \(\frac{1}{\mathrm{e}}\) times of its initial value in time \(t_{0}\) due to viscous forces. The time \(t_{0}\) and the percentage loss in mechanical energy during the above time interval \(t_{0}\) respectively are (Let damping constant be \(50 \mathrm{grams} / \mathrm{s}\) ) (1) 6s, \(\frac{\mathrm{e}^{2}-1}{\mathrm{e}^{2}} \times 100\) (2) 3s, \(\frac{e^{2}-1}{e^{2}} \times 100\) (3) 6s, \(\frac{e-1}{e} \times 100\) (4) 3s, \(\frac{e-1}{e} \times 100\)

A piece of string is cut into two pieces. The point at which the string is cut was chosen at random. What is the probability that the longer piece is at least three times as long as the shorter piece? (1) \(1 / 4\) (2) \(1 / 3\) (3) \(2 / 5\) (4) \(1 / 2\)

A particle moves along a constant curvature path between \(A\) and \(B\) (length of curve wire \(A B\) is \(100 \mathrm{~m}\) ) with a constant speed of \(72 \mathrm{~km} / \mathrm{hr}\). The acceleration of particle at mid point ' \(C\) ' of curve \(\mathrm{AB}\) is (1) Zero (2) \(3.14 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}^{2}\) (3) \(50.84 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}^{2}\) (4) \(50.84 \mathrm{~km} / \mathrm{hr}^{2}\)

Which of the following statements is not correct from the point of view of molecular orbital? (1) \(\mathrm{Be}_{2}\) is not a stable molecule (2) \(\mathrm{He}_{2}\) not stable but \(\mathrm{He}^{+}\)is expected to exist (3) Bond strength of \(\mathrm{N}_{2}\) is maximum amongst the homonuclear diatomic molecules (4) The order of energies of molecular orbitals in \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) molecule is \(\mathrm{E}(\sigma 2 \mathrm{~s})<\mathrm{E}\left(\sigma^{*} 2 \mathrm{~s}\right)<\mathrm{E}\left(\pi 2 p_{\mathrm{x}}\right)=\mathrm{E}\left(\pi 2 \mathrm{p}_{\mathrm{y}}\right)<\) \(\mathrm{E}\left(\sigma 2 \mathrm{p}_{2}\right)<\mathrm{E}\left(\pi^{\star} 2 \mathrm{p}_{\mathrm{x}}\right)=\mathrm{E}\left(\pi^{*} 2 \mathrm{p}_{y}\right)<\mathrm{E}\left(\sigma^{\star} 2 \mathrm{p}_{\mathrm{z}}\right)\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free