Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Is \((x-y)(x+y)>0\) ? (1) Both \(x\) and \(y\) are positive (2) \(x>y\) A. 1 alone, not 2 alone B. 2 alone, not 1 alone C. 1 and 2 together (need both) D. 1 alone or 2 alone E. 1 and 2 together are not sufficient

Short Answer

Expert verified
C. 1 and 2 together (need both)

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Question

Determine the condition under which \((x-y)(x+y)>0\). Break down the problem using given statements.
02

Analyze Statement 1

Statement 1: Both \(x\) and \(y\) are positive. If both variables are positive, \(x+y>0\) and \(x-y\) also potentially can be positive if \(x>y\). However, this statement alone doesn't guarantee that \(x>y\). So this statement alone is not sufficient.
03

Analyze Statement 2

Statement 2: \(x>y\). This implies that \(x-y>0\). However, for \( (x-y)(x+y)>0 \), we also need to ensure \( x+y>0 \). Since \( x \) and \( y \) can be of opposite signs (e.g., \( x=1 \), \( y=-2 \)), this statement alone is also insufficient.
04

Combine Statements 1 and 2

With both statements 1 and 2, we know \( x \) and \( y \) are positive and \( x>y \). Therefore, \( x+y>0 \) and \( x-y>0 \), making \( (x-y)(x+y)>0 \) always true. Both statements together are sufficient.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

inequality analysis
Inequality analysis is a crucial concept in GMAT problem solving. In this question, we must determine the values under which (x-y)(x+y)>0 . For this to hold, two conditions must be met: . This means both expressions, (x+y) and x-y, must be either both positive or both negative. Keep in mind the behavior of positive and negative numbers when analyzing inequalities. Analyzing statement 1: Both x and y are positive. This guarantees that (x+y)>0. However, without knowing the relationship between x and y, we cannot say if x-y >0. Therefore, statement 1 alone is not sufficient. Analyzing statement 2: x>y. This tells us x-y>0. But, it doesn't tell us if x+y >0 since x or y could be negative. Therefore, statement 2 alone is not sufficient.
data sufficiency
Data sufficiency is a unique question type in the GMAT. It requires you to analyze given statements to determine if they provide enough information to solve the problem. In our exercise, we are given two statements. Statement 1: Both x and y are positive. Statement 2: x > y. To decide if they are sufficient to answer if (x-y)(x+y)>0, we need to evaluate each statement individually and then together. First, we analyzed each statement alone: * Statement 1 alone: Tells us both numbers are positive but nothing about the relative size. It’s not sufficient. * Statement 2 alone: Tells us the relationship between x and y, but not their signs. It’s not sufficient. When we combine both statements, we know x and y are positive (from statement 1), and x > y (from statement 2). Now we have enough information. Combining the two statements ensures both (x+y) and x-y are positive, implying (x-y)(x+y) > 0 is true. Thus, both statements together are sufficient. Answer C is correct.
mathematical reasoning
Mathematical reasoning involves using logical and methodical steps to solve problems. For this problem, we use algebraic manipulation and logic to determine when (x-y)(x+y) > 0. We start by understanding what the product of two expressions greater than zero means. This means both expressions must be either both positive or both negative. Now, let’s reason through the problem: * If both x and y are positive (statement 1), we have (x+y)>0. However, we also need to know if x>y to ensure (x-y)>0. * If x>y (statement 2), this ensures (x-y)>0. But without knowing if x and y are both positive, (x+y) could be any value. By logically combining both pieces of information, we ascertain that: - From statement 1: x>0 and y>0 - From statement 2: x>y When both statements are combined, we can conclude both are positive and x>y, meeting all conditions for (x-y)(x+y)>0 to be true. Thus, using mathematical reasoning and combining pieces of information leads us to the correct solution. Combining both statements allows us to confidently determine the truth of the inequality. Answer C is correct.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The reader was really angry at the inaccuracy of the article. A. The reader was really angry at the inaccuracy of the article. B. The reader was really angry with the inaccuracy of the article. C. The reader was really angry for the inaccuracy of the article. D. The reader was really angry in the inaccuracy of the article. E. The reader was really angry of the inaccuracy of the article.

What is the probability of getting tails 6 consecutive times when you toss a coin (assume the coin has no bias)? A. 1/4 B. 1/8 C. 1/16 D. 1/32 E. 1/64

American workers have less holidays than their European counterparts. A. American workers have less holidays than their European counterparts. B. American workers have little holidays than their European counterparts. C. American workers have fewer holidays than their European counterparts. D. American workers have a bit less holidays than their European counterparts. E. American workers have smaller holidays than their European counterparts

Is \(1 / \sqrt{x}>1 \sqrt{y, \text { if both } x \text { and } y \text { are positive? }}\) (1) \(x-y>0\) (2) \(x>y\) A. 1 alone, not 2 alone B. 2 alone, not 1 alone C. 1 and 2 together (need both) D. 1 alone or 2 alone E. 1 and 2 together are not sufficient

No wonder he is reluctant to continue the treatment.The doctor told him that there is a likelihood of life-threatening complications. A. a likelihood of life-threatening complications. B. a likelihood of threaten life complications. C. a likelihood with life-threatening complications. D. a likelihood for life-threatening complications. E. a likelihood about threatening life complications.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free