Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Is \(\mathrm{n}\) divisible by 3 with no remainder? (1) \(\mathrm{n}-3\) is divisible by 3 with integer result (2) \(\mathrm{n}-21\) is divisible by 3 with integer result A. 1 alone, not 2 alone B. 2 alone, not 1 alone C. 1 and 2 together (need both) D. 1 alone or 2 alone E. 1 and 2 together are not sufficient

Short Answer

Expert verified
D. 1 alone or 2 alone

Step by step solution

01

Analyze Statement 1

Check if - 3 is divisible by 3 with an integer result. If - 3 = 3k for some integer k, then = 3(k + 1) and is divisible by 3.
02

Conclusion from Statement 1

Since - 3 is divisible by 3, is also divisible by 3. Thus, Statement 1 alone is sufficient.
03

Analyze Statement 2

Now, check if - 21 is divisible by 3 with an integer result. If - 21 = 3m for some integer m, then = 3(m + 7) and is divisible by 3.
04

Conclusion from Statement 2

Since - 21 is divisible by 3, is also divisible by 3. Thus, Statement 2 alone is sufficient.
05

Evaluate Combined Information

Both statements independently prove is divisible by 3. Hence, they do not need to be combined.
06

Choose the Correct Option

Since each statement independently confirms that is divisible by 3, the answer is D. Either statement alone is sufficient.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

GMAT preparation
Preparing for the GMAT requires a good understanding of mathematical concepts and the ability to apply them effectively. To ace the quantitative section, you need to master various problem-solving techniques.

For questions on divisibility, like the one given, it’s crucial to break down each statement and use logical reasoning to determine sufficiency.
Make sure to practice regularly to build confidence and speed.
Familiarize yourself with common divisibility rules and become adept at recognizing patterns to quickly identify whether a number is divisible by another.
number theory
Number theory is a branch of mathematics dealing with the properties and relationships of numbers, especially integers. In this example, understanding how to check divisibility is key.

Here are some essential number theory concepts:
  • A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3.
  • If a number minus another specific number is divisible by 3, then the original number is also divisible by 3.
In the given problem, both statements provide different subtractions that still result in multiples of 3, proving that n is divisible by 3. Practicing number theory will enhance your problem-solving skills for the GMAT.
problem-solving skills
Problem-solving skills are essential for tackling GMAT questions effectively. Being systematic in your approach helps in arriving at the correct answer.

Follow these steps:
  • Understand the question: What are you trying to prove?
  • Break down each statement to see what information it provides independently.
In this example, you need to check the divisibility of n by 3. You analyze each statement separately to see if it alone can confirm the divisibility.

This structure ensures that you comprehensively address each part of the problem without missing crucial details.
quantitative reasoning
Quantitative reasoning involves the ability to work with numerical and logical concepts to solve problems efficiently. This includes recognizing patterns, making generalizations based on given data, and applying mathematical concepts.

In the question about divisibility, you use quantitative reasoning to analyze how subtracting specific numbers (3 and 21) from n affects its divisibility by 3.
If n − 3 and n − 21 are divisible by 3, you logically conclude that n itself must also be divisible by 3. This approach not only saves time but also ensures accuracy. Sharpening your quantitative reasoning skills through practice problems will greatly benefit your GMAT preparation.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

It said on the bottle that drinking was bad for you and he drank so much he was drunk. A. and he drank so much he was drunk. B. he drunk so much he was drunk. C. he drank so much he was drank. D. he drunk so much he was drank. E. he drink so much he was drink

The assessment of the Director was pessimistic ago two weeks. A. The assessment of the Director was pessimistic ago two weeks. B. The Director’s assessment was pessimistic before two weeks. C. Two weeks before the assessment of the Director was pessimistic. D. Two weeks ago the Director’s assessment is pessimistic. E. Two weeks ago the assessment of the Director was pessimistic.

What is the value of \(x y ?\) (1) \(x+y=6\) (2) \(2 x+y=10\) A. 1 alone, not 2 alone B. 2 alone, not 1 alone C. 1 and 2 together (need both) D. 1 alone or 2 alone E. 1 and 2 together are not sufficient

. The book is about Sardinia, and the author has been all about that beautiful island. A. about Sardinia, and the author has been all about B. around Sardinia, and the author has been all around C. about Sardinia, and the author has been all around D. around Sardinia, and the author has been all about E. round Sardinia, and the author has been all round

What is the surface area of the cone? (1) \(\mathrm{L}=7 \mathrm{~cm}\) and the base is \(6 \mathrm{~cm}\) wide (2) The cone has a height of \(4 \mathrm{~cm}\) and the base a radius of \(3 \mathrm{~cm}\) A. 1 alone, not 2 alone B. 2 alone, not 1 alone C. 1 and 2 together (need both) D. 1 alone or 2 alone E. 1 and 2 together are not sufficient

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free