Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Is \(\mathrm{n}\) divisible by 3 with no remainder? (1) \(\mathrm{n}-3\) is divisible by 3 with integer result (2) \(\mathrm{n}-21\) is divisible by 3 with integer result A. 1 alone, not 2 alone B. 2 alone, not 1 alone C. 1 and 2 together (need both) D. 1 alone or 2 alone E. 1 and 2 together are not sufficient

Short Answer

Expert verified
D. 1 alone or 2 alone

Step by step solution

01

Analyze Statement 1

Check if - 3 is divisible by 3 with an integer result. If - 3 = 3k for some integer k, then = 3(k + 1) and is divisible by 3.
02

Conclusion from Statement 1

Since - 3 is divisible by 3, is also divisible by 3. Thus, Statement 1 alone is sufficient.
03

Analyze Statement 2

Now, check if - 21 is divisible by 3 with an integer result. If - 21 = 3m for some integer m, then = 3(m + 7) and is divisible by 3.
04

Conclusion from Statement 2

Since - 21 is divisible by 3, is also divisible by 3. Thus, Statement 2 alone is sufficient.
05

Evaluate Combined Information

Both statements independently prove is divisible by 3. Hence, they do not need to be combined.
06

Choose the Correct Option

Since each statement independently confirms that is divisible by 3, the answer is D. Either statement alone is sufficient.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

GMAT preparation
Preparing for the GMAT requires a good understanding of mathematical concepts and the ability to apply them effectively. To ace the quantitative section, you need to master various problem-solving techniques.

For questions on divisibility, like the one given, it’s crucial to break down each statement and use logical reasoning to determine sufficiency.
Make sure to practice regularly to build confidence and speed.
Familiarize yourself with common divisibility rules and become adept at recognizing patterns to quickly identify whether a number is divisible by another.
number theory
Number theory is a branch of mathematics dealing with the properties and relationships of numbers, especially integers. In this example, understanding how to check divisibility is key.

Here are some essential number theory concepts:
  • A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3.
  • If a number minus another specific number is divisible by 3, then the original number is also divisible by 3.
In the given problem, both statements provide different subtractions that still result in multiples of 3, proving that n is divisible by 3. Practicing number theory will enhance your problem-solving skills for the GMAT.
problem-solving skills
Problem-solving skills are essential for tackling GMAT questions effectively. Being systematic in your approach helps in arriving at the correct answer.

Follow these steps:
  • Understand the question: What are you trying to prove?
  • Break down each statement to see what information it provides independently.
In this example, you need to check the divisibility of n by 3. You analyze each statement separately to see if it alone can confirm the divisibility.

This structure ensures that you comprehensively address each part of the problem without missing crucial details.
quantitative reasoning
Quantitative reasoning involves the ability to work with numerical and logical concepts to solve problems efficiently. This includes recognizing patterns, making generalizations based on given data, and applying mathematical concepts.

In the question about divisibility, you use quantitative reasoning to analyze how subtracting specific numbers (3 and 21) from n affects its divisibility by 3.
If n − 3 and n − 21 are divisible by 3, you logically conclude that n itself must also be divisible by 3. This approach not only saves time but also ensures accuracy. Sharpening your quantitative reasoning skills through practice problems will greatly benefit your GMAT preparation.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Is \(x^3>y^3\) ? (1) \(x>y\) (2) \(x / y>0\) A. 1 alone, not 2 alone B. 2 alone, not 1 alone C. 1 and 2 together (need both) D. 1 alone or 2 alone E. 1 and 2 together are not sufficient

Have a close look at that one here. It is a facsimile, while those on the table are original and those in the library across town are all rather poor-quality fakes. A. that one here. It is a facsimile, while those on the table are original and those in the library B. this one here. It is a facsimile, while those on the table are original and these in the library C. this one here. It is a facsimile, while these on the table are original and those in the library D. that one here. It is a facsimile, while that on the table are original and those in the library E. this one here. It is a facsimile, while these on the table are original and that one in the library

What is the size of the non-shaded area? (1) The square has sides 10 cm long (2) The semicircle has a radius of 5 cm A. 1 alone, not 2 alone B. 2 alone, not 1 alone C. 1 and 2 together (need both) D. 1 alone or 2 alone E. 1 and 2 together are not sufficient

Two reasons were given for the less than promising performance of the banking system, both which could take two to three years’ intensive work to improve. A. both which could take two to three years’ B. most of which could take two to three years’ C. both at which could take two or three years’ D. both of which could take two to three years’ E. which could take two to three years’

He used to run very good, but since the injury last year he has not been good at running. A. run very good, but since the injury last year he has not been good at running. B. be a good runner, but since the injury last year he has not run so well. C. run very well, but since the injury last year he has not run any good. D. run very good, but since the injury last year he has not run so good. E. be a very good runner, but since the injury last year he used to be better

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free