Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Was money a better store of value in the United States in the 1950s than in the 1970s? Why or why not? In which period would you have been more willing to hold money?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Rate of inflation plays vital role in stating the value of a currency.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Introduction

Money is a tool that acts as a medium in economic transactions. It also serves the purpose of measure of value and store of value, and facilitates trade.

02

Step 2. Explanation

In the 1950s, the rate of inflation was comparatively lower than the in the 1970s. So, in the 1970s, inflation caused the value of cash holdings to decline. Storing value in money was harmful in the 1970s. So, money was a better store of value in the 1950s.

A person would have been more willing to hold money in the 1950s as the inflation was lower.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In prison, cigarettes are sometimes used among inmates as a form of payment. How is it possible for cigarettes to solve the โ€œdouble coincidence of wantsโ€ problem, even if a prisoner does not smoke?

19. The table below shows hypothetical values, in billions of dollars, of different forms of money.

a. Use the table to calculate the M1 and M2 money supplies for each year, as well as the growth rates of the M1 and M2 money supplies from the previous year.

b. Why are the growth rates of M1 and M2 so different? Explain.


2019202020212022
Currency880895900906
Money market mutual fund shares680685683692
Saving account deposits5,5005,7805,9686,105
Money market deposit accounts1,2141,2451,2741,329
Demand and checkable deposits1,000972980993
Small denomination time deposits8408711,1331,576
Traveler's check5543
3-month treasury bills1,9862,3742,4362,502

Why is simply counting currency an inadequate measure of money?

The money supply is the entire amount of money in circulation, including cash, coins, and bank account balances. The money supply is typically defined as a collection of safe assets that consumers and companies can use to make payments or invest in short-term.

In April 2009, year-over-year the growth rate of M1 fell to 6.1%, while the growth rate of M2 rose to 10.3%. In September 2013, the growth rate of the M1 money supply was 6.5%, while the growth rate of the M2 money supply was about 8.3%. How should Federal Reserve policymakers interpret these changes in the growth rates of M1 and M2?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free