Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The money multiplier declined significantly during the period 1930-1933 and also during the recent financial crisis of 2008-2010. Yet the 2008-2010money supply decreased by 25% in the Depression period but increased by more than 20% during the recent financial crisis. What explains the difference in outcomes?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Money multiplier declined during both emergency as economies sped down. However,the money related base was higher and kept on ascending during the new monetary emergency (2008-10), which was more than expected to counterbalance the fall in the money multiplier. In actuality during the economic crisis of the early 20s (1930-33), the financial base was moderately unassuming.

Step by step solution

01

Concept introduction

A financial crisis is any of an expansive assortment of circumstances wherein a few financial resources abruptly lose an enormous piece of their ostensible worth

02

Money supply changes straightforwardly 

The money supply changes straightforwardly with changes in the financial base (powerful money), and differs contrarily with the cash and hold proportions. Financial or money base is the most fluid monetary standards in courses with overall population or stores (required and abundance) in he tbanking framework.

There was a hole of very nearly eighty years between the two occasions. The phases of financial turns of events (also known as consumersim, realism, goals and resulting need for money) and populace were different at these two unique moments.

Money multiplier declined during both emergency as economies sped down. However,the money related base was higher and kept on ascending during the new monetary emergency (2008-10), which was more than expected to counterbalance the fall in the money multiplier. Going against the norm during the economic crisis of the early 20s (1930-33), the financial base was somewhat humble.

03

Final answer

Money multiplier declined during both emergency as economies sped down. However, the money related base was higher and kept on ascending during the new monetary emergency (2008-10), which was more than expected to counterbalance the fall in the money multiplier. In actuality during the economic crisis of the early 20s (1930-33), the financial base was moderately unassuming.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

โ€œThe money multiplier is necessarily greater than 1.โ€ Is this statement true, false, or uncertain? Explain your answer

If a bank depositor withdraws$1000 of currency from an account, what happens to reserves, checkable deposits, and the monetary base?

If the Fed sells 1 million of bonds and banks reduce their borrowings from the Fed by million, predict what will happen to the money supply.

Classify each of these transactions as an asset, a liability, or neither for each of the โ€œplayersโ€ in the money supply processโ€”the Federal Reserve, banks, and depositors.

a. You get a \(10,000loan from the bank to buy an automobile.

b. You deposit \)400into your checking account at the local bank.

c. The Fed provides an emergency loan to a bank for\(1,000,000.

d. A bank borrows \)500,000in overnight loans from another bank.

e. You use your debit card to purchase a meal at a restaurant for $100.

Suppose that the required reserve ratio is 9%, currency in circulation is 620billion, the amount of checkable deposits is 950billion, and excess reserves are 15billion.

a. Calculate the money supply, the currency deposit ratio, the excess reserve ratio, and the money multiplier.

b. Suppose the central bank conducts an unusually large open market purchase of bonds held by banks of 1300billion due to a sharp contraction in the economy. Assuming the ratios you calculated in part (a) remain the same, predict the effect on the money supply.

c. Suppose the central bank conducts the same open market purchase as in part (b), except that banks choose to hold all of these proceeds as excess reserves rather than loan them out, due to fear of a financial crisis. Assuming that currency and deposits remain the same, what happens to the amount of excess reserves, the excess reserve ratio, the money supply, and the money multiplier?

d. Following the financial crisis in 2008, the Federal Reserve began injecting the banking system with massive amounts of liquidity, and at the same time, very little lending occurred. As a result, the M1 money multiplier was below 1 for most of the time from October 2008 through 2011. How does this scenario relate to your answer to part (c)?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free