Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The Fed’s maximum employment mandate is generally interpreted as an attempt to achieve an unemployment rate that is as close as possible to the natural rate and inflation that is close to its 2%goal for personal consumption expenditure price inflation. Go to the St. Louis Federal Reserve FRED database, and find data on the personal consumption expenditure price index (PCECTPI), the unemployment rate (UNRATE), and a measure of the natural rate of unemployment (NROU). For the price index, adjust the units setting to “Percent Change From Year Ago” to convert the data to the inflation rate; for the unemployment rate, change the frequency setting to “Quarterly.” Download the data into a spreadsheet. Calculate the unemployment gap and inflation gap for each quarter. Then, using the inflation gap, create an average inflation gap measure by taking the average of the current inflation gap and the gaps for the previous three quarters. Now apply the following (admittedly arbitrary and ad hoc) test to the data from 2000:Q1 through the most recent data available: If the unemployment gap is larger than 1.0for two or more consecutive quarters, and/ or the average inflation gap is larger in absolute value than 0.5for two or more consecutive quarters, consider the mandate “violated.”

a. Based on this ad hoc test, in which quarters has the Fed “violated” the price stability portion of its mandate? In which quarters has the Fed “violated” the maximum employment mandate?

b. Is the Fed currently “in violation” of its mandate?

c. Interpret your results. What does your response to part (a) and the data imply about the challenge that monetary policymakers face in achieving the Fed’s mandate perfectly at all times?

Short Answer

Expert verified

As per the information's

a) The Fed violated the price stability mandate according to this ad-hoc test five times since 2000. The Fed violated the employment mandate twice since 2000.

b) According to this test, the Fed currently is violating its mandate.

c) Since the Fed failed the employment test, it is difficult to fulfill its objective.

Step by step solution

01

Concept Introduction (part a)

Based on this ad hoc test, in which quarters has the Fed “violated” the price stability portion of its mandate

02

Explanation (part a)

The Fed violated the price stability mandate according to this ad hoc test five times since 2000.

2002(Q2) - 2002(Q4), - 2005(Q1) - 2007(Q1),

2007(Q4) -2008(Q4), 2009(Q2) - 2010(Q2)

and 2013(Q2) - 2014(Q1).

The Fed violated the employment mandate twice since 2000.2003(Q2) - 2003(Q4) and 2008(Q3) -2014(Q1).

03

Final Answer (part a)

The Fed violated the price stability mandate according to this ad-hoc test five times since 2000. The Fed violated the employment mandate twice since2000 .

04

Concept Introduction (part b)

Is the Fed currently “in violation” of its mandate

05

Explanation (part b)

As indicated by this test, the Fed right now is violating its mandate. The unemployment rate is 1.2% points over the normal rate, and the average inflation measure shows expansion is 0.9% points underneath the2% target. The Fed had violated the employment mandate since 2008(Q3) and has been violating t the price stability mandate since 2013(Q2).

06

Final Answer (part b)

According to this test, the Fed currently is violating its mandate

07

Concept Introduction (part c)

Interpret your results

08

Explanation (part c)

Since the Fed failed the employment test, it is challenging to satisfy its objective. In any case, different violations are noted as to some degree minor and won't keep going for a really long time.

09

Final Answer (part c)

Since the Fed failed the employment test, it is difficult to fulfill its objective.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Why might it be better to lean against credit-driven bubbles rather than just clean up after asset bubbles burst?

. Go to the St. Louis Federal Reserve FRED database, and find data on the personal consumption expenditure price index (PCECTPI), real GDP (GDPC1), an estimate of potential GDP (GDPPOT), and the federal funds rate (DFF). For the price index, adjust the units setting to “Percent Change From Year Ago” to convert the data to the inflation rate; for the federal funds rate, change the frequency setting to “Quarterly.” Download the data into a spreadsheet. Assuming the inflation target is 2% and the equilibrium real fed funds rate is 2%, calculate the inflation gap and the output gap for each quarter, from 2000 until the most recent quarter of data available. Calculate the output gap as the percentage deviation of output from the potential level of output.

a. Use the output and inflation gaps to calculate, for each quarter, the fed funds rate predicted by the Taylor rule. Assume that the weights on inflation stabilization and output stabilization are both ½ (see the formula in the chapter). Compare the current (quarterly average) federal funds rate to the federal funds rate prescribed by the Taylor rule. Does the Taylor rule accurately predict the current rate? Briefly comment.

b. Create a graph that compares the predicted Taylor rule values with the actual quarterly federal funds rate averages. How well, in general, does the Taylor rule prediction fit the average federal funds rate? Briefly explain.

c. Based on the results from the 2008–2009 period, explain the limitations of the Taylor rule as a formal policy tool. How do these limitations help explain the use of nonconventional monetary policy during this period?

d. Suppose Congress changes the Fed’s mandate to a hierarchical one in which inflation stabilization takes priority over output stabilization. In this context, recalculate the predicted Taylor rule value for each quarter since 2000, assuming that the weight on inflation stabilization is ¾ and the weight on output stabilization is ¼. Create a graph showing the Taylor rule prediction calculated in part (a), the prediction using the new “hierarchical” Taylor rule, and the fed funds rate. How, if at all, does changing the mandate change the predicted policy paths? How would the fed funds rate be affected by a hierarchical mandate? Briefly explain.

e. Assume again equal weights of ½ on inflation and output stabilization, and suppose instead that beginning after the end of 2008, the equilibrium real fed funds rate declines by 0.05 each quarter (i.e. 2009:Q1 is 1.95, then 1.90, etc.), and once it reaches zero, it remains at zero thereafter. How does it affect the prescribed fed funds rate? Why might this be important for policymakers to take into consideration?

Why would it be problematic for a central bank to have a primary goal of maximizing economic growth?

“Because inflation targeting focuses on achieving the inflation target, it will lead to excessive output fluctuations.” Is this statement true, false, or uncertain? Explain.

“Interest rates can be measured more accurately and quickly than reserve aggregates; hence an interest rate is preferred to the reserve aggregates as a policy instrument.” Do you agree or disagree? Explain your answer

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free