Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Explain why you would be more or less willing to buy a house under the following circumstances:

a. You just inherited $100,000.

b. Real estate commissions fall from 6%of the sales price to 5%of the sales price.

c. You expect Microsoft stock to double in value next year.

d. Prices in the stock market become more volatile.

e. You expect housing prices to fall.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Part (a) If one has just inherited $100,000, he will be more ready to purchase a home.

Part (b) If the real estate commission decreases, more people will be willing to buy a home.

Part (c) If one believes that M Company's stock price will quadruple next year, one will be less willing to buy a home.

Part (d) If the stock market becomes more volatile, people will be more willing to buy a house.

Part (e) If one believes that the price of a house would fall, he will be less eager to purchase one.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction 

The amount demanded of an asset is directly related to wealth, expected return on asset, and liquidity of the asset, and negatively proportional to expected return on alternative asset, liquidity of the alternative asset, according to the theory of portfolio choice.

02

Explanation to part (a)

If one has just received $100,000, he may be more ready to buy a house because he now has more money to spend and may want to put that money toward the purchase of a new home.

As a result, if one has just inherited $100,000, he will be more ready to purchase a home.

03

Explanation to part (b)

If the real estate commission is reduced from $6percent to $5percent, people will be more willing to buy a new house because it would cost less than it did previously.

As a result, if the real estate commission decreases, more people will be willing to buy a home.

04

Explanation to part (c)

If one believes that the stock price of M Company will double next year, he will be less willing to buy a property because he can now earn more money by purchasing M Company stocks now and selling them a year later. A house would only be purchased if the gain in the price of the house outweighed the rise in the stock price.

As a result, if one believes that M Company's stock price will quadruple next year, one will be less willing to buy a home.

05

Explanation to part (d)

If stock market prices become more unpredictable, investors will be more inclined to purchase a home since the stock market will become riskier, and an investor would want to invest in a less risky environment, which the purchase of a home will provide.

As a result, if the stock market becomes more volatile, people will be more willing to buy a house.

06

Explanation to part (e)

If one believes that the price of a property will fall, he will be less eager to acquire one because he will lose money on the purchase or because he will be able to buy the house at a lower price at a later period.

As a result, if one believes that the price of a house would fall, he will be less eager to purchase one.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What will happen in the bond market if the government imposes a limit on the amount of daily transactions? Which characteristic of an asset would be affected?

M1 money growth in the U.S. was about 15%in localid="1647014587488" 2011and2012, and 10%in 2013. Over the same time period, the yield on 3-month Treasury bills was close to 0%. Given these high rates of money growth, why did interest rates stay so low, rather than increase? What does this say about the income, price-level, and expected-inflation effects

Why should a rise in the price level (but not in expected inflation) cause interest rates to rise when the nominal money supply is fixed?

Go to the St. Louis Federal Reserve FRED database, and find data on the M1money supply (M1SL) and the 10-year U.S. Treasury bond rate (GS10). For the M1money supply indicator, adjust the units setting to โ€œPercent Change from Year Ago,โ€ and for both variables, adjust the frequency setting to โ€œQuarterly.โ€ Download the data into a spreadsheet.

a. Create a scatter plot, with money growth on the horizontal axis and the 10-year Treasury rate on the vertical axis, from 2000:Q1to the most recent quarter of data available. On the scatter plot, graph a fitted (regression) line of the data (there are several ways to do this; however, one particular chart layout has this option built in). Based on the fitted line, are the data consistent with the liquidity effect? Briefly explain.

b. Repeat part (a), but this time compare the contemporaneous money growth rate with the interest rate four quarters later. For example, create a scatter plot comparing money growth from 2000:Q1with the interest rate from 2000:Q1, and so on, up to the most recent pairwise data available. Compare your results to those obtained in part (a), and interpret the liquidity effect as it relates to the income, price-level, and expected-inflation effects.

c. Repeat part (a) again, except this time compare the contemporaneous money growth rate with the interest rate eight quarters later. For example, create a scatter plot comparing money growth from 2000:Q1with the interest rate from 2002:Q1, and so on, up to the most recent pairwise data available. Assuming the liquidity and other effects are fully incorporated into the bond market after two years, what do your results imply about the overall effect of money growth on interest rates?

d. Based on your answers to parts (a) through (c), how do the actual data on money growth and interest rates compare to the three scenarios presented in Figure 11of this chapter?

The demand curve and supply curve for one-year discount bonds with a face value of$1000are represented by the following equations:

Bd:Price=-0.8ร—Quantity+1100Bs:Price=Quantity+680

a. What is the expected equilibrium price and quantity of bonds in this market?

b. Given your answer to part (a), what is the expected interest rate in this market?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free