Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In what way might consumer protection regulations negatively affect a financial intermediary’s profits? Can you think of a positive effect of such regulations on profits?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Financial intermediaries achieve a benefit by their center business of loaning or production of assets. Their benefits differ contingent on the choice of resources. It might prompt disappointment of banks and an unfilled hand for lenders. By confining interest in high gamble resources, the regulations save money by expanding their resources portfolio. Thusly, the bank keeps its benefit pattern up.

Step by step solution

01

Concept Introduction

Consumer protection is the act of shielding purchasers of labor and products, and the general community, against out-of-line, rehearses in the commercial center. Consumer protection measures are frequently settled by regulation. Such regulations are anticipated to keep organizations from experiencing in misrepresentation or indicating uncalled-for rehearses to acquire a benefit over contenders or to misdirect consumers.

02

Explanation

Financial intermediaries procure benefits by their center business of loaning or making of resources. Their profits fluctuate contingent on the choice of ventures. Putting resources into high-risk resources, for example, stocks and bonds will have more results than putting resources into low-return government protections.

In any case, taking a lot of risks, albeit the result might be more, may prompt loss of banks and a vacant hand for leasers. As a result of uneven data, consumers might not have genuine information about financial exchanges. Subsequently, consumer protection guidelines are important to have command over resource dissemination.

03

Explanation

Consumer protection regulations as the consumer protection act guaranteed that consumers should be made mindful of the expense of borrowings, yearly rate, and absolute money charge on the advance. This was material for every one of the moneylenders and not bound to banks as it were. Further, the Fair Credit Billing Act guaranteed that Visa clients are told a strategy for evaluating complete money charges.

On account of these exposures, financial intermediaries were begun trying not to put resources into extremely high gamble resources and were adjusting among return and security. This impacted adversely on their benefit.

04

Final Answer

By limiting investment in increased risk resources, the guidelines assist keeps money with distinguishing their resource portfolio so emergencies in one specific area should be padded by different areas. Thusly, the bank keeps its benefit pattern up.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Go to the St. Louis Federal Reserve FRED database, and find data on the number of commercial banks in the United States in each of the following categories: average assets less than \(100 million (US100NUM), average assets between \)100 million and \(300 million (US13NUM), average assets between \)300 million and \(1 billion (US31NUM), average assets between \)1 billion and \(15 billion (US115NUM), and average assets greater than \)15 billion (USG15NUM). Download the data into a spreadsheet. Calculate the percentage of banks in the smallest (less than \(100 million) and largest (greater than \)15 billion) categories, as a percentage of the total number of banks, for the most recent quarter of data available and for 1990:Q1. What has happened to the proportion of very large banks? What has happened to the proportion of very small banks? What does this say about the “too-big-to-fail” problem and moral hazard?

Go to the St. Louis Federal Reserve FRED database, and find data on the residual of assets less liabilities, or bank capital (RALACBM027SBOG), and total assets of commercial banks (TLAACBM027SBOG). Download the data from January 1990 through the most recent month available into a spreadsheet. For each monthly observation, calculate the bank leverage ratio as the ratio of bank capital to total assets. Create a line graph of the leverage ratio over time. All else being equal, what can you conclude about leverage and moral hazard in commercial banks over time?

Consider a failing bank. How much is a deposit of $290,000 worth to the depositor . if the FDIC uses the payoff method? The purchase-and-assumption method? Which method is more costly to taxpayers?

Why can government safety nets create both an adverse selection problem and a moral hazard problem?

What are some of the limitations to the Basel and Basel 2 Accords? How does the Basel 3 Accord attempt to address these limitations?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free