Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

You own a house worth $800,000 that is located on a river bank. If the river floods moderately, the house will be completely destroyed. This happens about once every 50 years. If you build a seawall, the river would have to flood heavily to destroy your house, which only happens about once every 200 years. What would be the annual premium for a flood insurance policy that offers full insurance? For a policy that pays only 70% of the home value, what are your expected costs with and without a seawall? Do the different policies provide an incentive to be safer (i.e., to build the seawall) ?

Short Answer

Expert verified

If the yearly expense of the structure and keeping a seawall is under $11,200each year, we can say that neither the insurance policy will be better or worse.

Step by step solution

01

Content Introduction

The annual project cost is the projection sum that might be brought about in finishing a predetermined task. It is a piece of capital planning used to decide real fixed-cost agreements with different parties.

02

Content Explanation

With full insurance the expected loss is 800,000×0.02=16,000

With a seawall, the expected loss is localid="1649654243299" 800,000×0.005=4000

The estimated loss will be charged as a premium by the insurance company. The premium is the annual expense you can expect in either circumstance.

With partial insurance,

Without a seawall, the expected loss is 0.7×80,000×0.02=11,200

With a seawall, the expected loss is 0.7×800,000×0.005=2,800

The estimated loss will be charged as a premium by the insurance company. The premium is the annual expense you can expect in either circumstance.

Without the seawall, [0.02×(5,60,000-800,000)+0.98(0)]-11.200=-16,000

With a seawall, [0.005×(5,60,000-800,000)+0.98]-2,800=-4000

Tragically, neither the insurance contract is better nor it is regrettable. Although the expenses under the fractional are lower, the normal expense every year is equivalent to full protection.

Regardless you will build the seawall if the annual cost of building and maintaining a seawall is under $11,200 each year.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

How can asymmetric information problems lead to a bank panic?

Explain how the separation of ownership and control in American corporations might lead to poor management.

Go to the St. Louis Federal Reserve FRED database and find data on the percent of value of loans secured by collateral for all commercial and industrial loans (ESANQ) and the net percentage of domestic banks tightening standards for commercial and industrial loans to large and middle-market firms (DRTSCILM). Download the data into a spreadsheet.

a. Calculate the average, over the most recent four quarters and the four quarters prior to that, for the bank standards indicator and the “percent of loans secured by collateral” indicator. Do these averages behave as you would expect?

b. Use the Data Analysis tool in Excel to calculate the correlation coefficient for the two data series from 1997:Q3 to the most recent quarter of data available. What can you conclude about the relationship between collateral and bank C&I lending standards? Is this result consistent with efforts to reduce asymmetric information?

Which problem of asymmetric information are prospective employers trying to solve when they ask applicants to go through a job interview. Is that the end of the information asymmetry?

Suppose you go to your local bank, intending to buy a certificate of deposit with your savings. Explain why you would prefer this to offering a loan, at an interest rate that is higher than the rate the bank pays on certificates of deposit (but lower than the rate the bank charges for car loans), to the next individual who enters the bank and applies for a car loan.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free