Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Describe a real-world setting in which option contracts are used.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option contracts are used in stock markets for speculation or hedging purposes.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Option Contracts

Option contracts are financial instruments that give a buyer the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell an asset at a predetermined price before or on a certain date. There are two primary types of options: call options and put options.
02

Real-World Setting: Stock Market

Option contracts are commonly used in the stock market. Investors or traders use options to speculate on the movement of stock prices or to hedge their investment portfolios against potential losses.
03

Example Scenario

Consider an investor who holds shares in a technology company. They might buy put options as an insurance policy to protect against a potential downturn in the stock's price. If the stock price falls, the value of the put options would increase, offsetting the losses in the stock holdings.
04

Alternative Approach: Speculation

Traders can also use call options to speculate on a stock's future increase. For instance, if a trader anticipates a tech stock price will rise, they might purchase call options. If the stock price indeed surges, they can exercise their options to buy shares at a lower price than the current market rate, thereby making a profit.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Financial Instruments
Financial instruments are essential tools that facilitate the flow of capital in the markets. They represent assets that can be bought, sold, or traded and serve as a medium for investment activities. One of the primary types of financial instruments is the option contract. Options provide the flexibility to either purchase or sell an underlying asset at an agreed price and date.
Options, along with other financial instruments like stocks, bonds, and derivatives, play a vital role in economic systems. They help investors manage risk, speculate on financial trends, and diversify their portfolios. Understanding how to utilize financial instruments effectively can lead to informed investment decisions.
Key examples of financial instruments include:
  • Equities - shares or stocks representing ownership in a company.
  • Bonds - debt securities issued by entities to raise capital.
  • Derivatives - contracts whose value depends on an underlying asset, such as options.
Stock Market
The stock market is a dynamic environment where securities such as stocks and options are traded. It serves as a public platform for investors to buy and sell ownership shares of companies, known as stocks, and other financial products like options.
The stock market operates through exchanges, which act as intermediaries for buyers and sellers to conduct their trades. Well-known exchanges include the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations (NASDAQ).
Investors participate in the stock market for various reasons:
  • Investment Growth - Investing in stocks potentially offers high returns compared to other savings options.
  • Income Generation - Dividend-paying stocks provide regular income streams.
  • Speculation - Traders exploit market volatility to achieve quick profits.
Understanding how the stock market functions can help investors make strategic choices and utilize products like option contracts effectively.
Investment Hedging
Investment hedging is a risk management strategy employed to protect investments from adverse market movements. It involves using financial instruments, such as options, to offset potential losses in a portfolio. This technique acts as an insurance policy for investors.
When hedging, an investor might choose to purchase put options to guard against a decline in stock prices. If the market falls, the options gain in value, mitigating losses from the stock holdings. Hedging is particularly beneficial for risk-averse investors or those managing large portfolios.
Benefits of Investment Hedging include:
  • Risk Reduction - Minimizes potential financial losses.
  • Portfolio Stability - Creates a more balanced and less volatile investment portfolio.
  • Market Leverage - Allows participation in market growth while controlling downside risks.
It's crucial for investors to assess their risk tolerance and market outlook when implementing hedging strategies.
Call Options
Call options are a type of financial derivative contract that gives the holder the right, but not the obligation, to buy an underlying asset at a specified price within a certain timeframe. They are often used in the stock market as a method of speculation or investment hedging.
In practice, a trader might purchase a call option if they believe that the stock price will rise in the future. This enables them to lock in a purchasing price that could be lower than the future market price, potentially gaining significant profits. However, it's important to note that if the market price does not exceed the agreed price, the option may expire worthless.
Key aspects of Call Options:
  • Strike Price - The predetermined price at which the holder can buy the stock.
  • Expiration Date - The date by which the holder must exercise the option.
  • Premium - The price paid for the option, representing the risk premium.
Understanding these elements helps investors make informed decisions when planning to utilize call options.
Put Options
Put options are another type of financial derivative that grants the holder the right, but not the obligation, to sell an underlying asset at a set price before the option expires. Investors use put options primarily to hedge against potential declines in stock prices or to speculate on such decreases.
By buying a put option, an investor can secure a selling price for their shares, providing a safety net if the stock value falls. Let’s say an investor owns stock projected to decrease; they purchase a put option to maintain their asset value. If the price does indeed drop, the option gains in value, compensating for the stock's decline.
Key points to understand about Put Options:
  • Strike Price - The predetermined selling price of the asset.
  • Expiration Date - The deadline for executing the selling right.
  • Premium - The cost paid to purchase the put option, which is a non-refundable amount.
By comprehending these features, traders can use put options effectively to safeguard their investments.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that an entrepreneur is deciding whether or not to build a new highspeed railroad on the West Coast. Building the railroad will require an initial sunk \(\operatorname{cost} F\). If operated, the new railroad will generate revenue \(R\). Operating the railroad will cost \(M\) in fuel and \(n w\) in wages, where \(n\) is the number of full-time jobs needed to operate the new railroad and \(w\) is the career wage per worker. If a rail worker does not work on the new railroad, then he can get a wage of \(\bar{w}\) at some other job. Assume that \(R>M+F+n \bar{w}\), so it would be profitable to build and operate the new railroad even if rail workers had to be paid somewhat more than the going rate \(\bar{w}\). The entrepreneur, however, must decide whether to invest the initial sunk cost \(F\) before knowing the wages she must pay. (a) Suppose that if the railroad is built, after \(F\) is invested, the local rail workers' union can make a "take it or leave it" wage demand \(w\) to the entrepreneur. That is, the entrepreneur can only choose to accept and pay the wage demand \(w\) or to shut down. If the railroad shuts down, each worker receives \(\bar{w}\). Will the railroad be built? Why? (b) Next suppose that the wage is jointly selected by the union and the entrepreneur, where the union has bargaining weight \(\pi_{\mathrm{U}}\) and the entrepreneur has bargaining weight \(\pi_{\mathrm{E}}=1-\pi_{\mathrm{U}}\). Use the concept of negotiation equilibrium to state the conditions under which the railroad will be built. (c) Explain the nature of the hold-up problem in this example. Discuss why the hold-up problem disappears when the entrepreneur has all of the bargaining power. Finally, describe ways in which people try to avoid the hold-up problem in practice.

Estelle has an antique desk that she does not need, whereas Joel and his wife have a new house with no furniture. Estelle and Joel would like to arrange a trade, whereby Joel would get the desk at a price. In addition, the desk could use restoration work, which would enhance its value to Joel. Specifically, the desk is worth 0 to Estelle (its current owner), regardless of whether it is restored. An unrestored desk is worth \(\$ 100\) to Joel, whereas a restored desk is worth \(\$ 900\). Neither Joel nor Estelle has the skills to perform the restoration. Jerry, a professional actor and woodworker, can perform the restoration at a personal cost of \(\$ 500\). Jerry does not need a desk, so his value of owning the restored or unrestored desk is 0 . (a) Suppose Estelle, Jerry, and Joel can meet to negotiate a spot contract specifying transfer of the desk, restoration, and transfer of money. Model this as a three-player, joint-decision problem, and draw the appropriate extensive form. Calculate the outcome by using the standard bargaining solution, under the assumption that the players have equal bargaining weights \(\left(\pi_{\mathrm{E}}=\pi_{\text {Jerry }}=\pi_{\text {Joel }}=1 / 3\right)\). Does the desk get traded? Is the desk restored? Is this the efficient outcome? (b) Suppose spot contracting as in part (a) is not possible. Instead, the players interact in the following way. On Monday, Estelle and Jerry jointly decide whether to have Jerry restore the desk (and at what price to Estelle). If they choose to restore the desk, Jerry performs the work immediately. Then on Wednesday, regardless of what happened on Monday, Estelle and Joel jointly decide whether to trade the desk for money. Model this game by drawing the extensive form. (Hint: The extensive form only has joint-decision nodes.) Assume the parties have equal bargaining weights at all joint-decision nodes. Determine the negotiation equilibrium. Compare the outcome with that of part (a). (c) Now suppose the players interact in a different order. On Monday, Estelle and Joel jointly decide whether to trade the desk for money. Trade takes place immediately. On Wednesday, if Joel owns the desk, then he and Jerry jointly decide whether to have Jerry restore the desk (and at what price to Joel). If they choose to restore the desk, Jerry performs the work immediately. Model this game by drawing the extensive form. (Hint: Again, the extensive form only has joint-decision nodes.) Assume the parties have equal bargaining weights at all jointdecision nodes. Determine the negotiation equilibrium. Compare the outcome with that of parts (a) and (b). (d) Explain the nature of the hold-up problem in this example.

Recall that "human capital" refers to skills and expertise that workers develop. General human capital is that which makes a worker highly productive in potential jobs with many different employers. Specific human capital is that which makes a worker highly productive with only a single employer. What kind of investment in human capital should you make to increase your bargaining power with an employer, general or specific? Why? Do valuable outside options enhance or diminish your bargaining power?

A bicycle manufacturer (the "buyer," abbreviated B) wishes to procure a new robotic system for the production of mountain-bike frames. The firm contracts with a supplier (S), who will design and construct the robot. The contractual relationship is modeled by the following game: The parties first negotiate a contract specifying an externally enforced price that the buyer must pay. The price is contingent on whether the buyer later accepts delivery of the robot (A) or rejects delivery (R), which is the only event that is verifiable to the court. Specifically, if the buyer accepts delivery, then he must pay \(p_{1}\); if he rejects delivery, then he pays \(p_{0}\). After the contract is made, the seller decides whether to invest at a high level (H) or at a low level (L). High investment indicates that the seller has worked diligently to create a high-quality robot-one that meets the buyer's specifications. High investment costs the seller 10. The buyer observes the seller's investment and then decides whether to accept delivery. If the seller selected \(\mathrm{H}\) and the buyer accepts delivery, then the robot is worth 20 units of revenue to the buyer. If the seller selected \(\mathrm{L}\) and the buyer accepts delivery, then the robot is only worth 5 to the buyer. If the buyer rejects delivery, then the robot gives him no value. (a) What is the efficient outcome of this game? (b) Suppose the parties wish to write a "specific-performance" contract, which mandates that the buyer accept delivery at price \(p_{1}\). How can \(p_{0}\) be set so that the buyer has the incentive to accept delivery regardless of the seller's investment? Would the seller choose H in this case? (c) Under what conditions of \(p_{0}\) and \(p_{1}\) would the buyer have the incentive to accept delivery if and only if the seller selects H? Show that the efficient outcome can be obtained through the use of such an "option contract." (d) Fully describe the negotiation equilibrium of the game, under the assumption that the parties have equal bargaining weights.

8\. Here is a description of interaction between two players who are considering a possible business partnership. First the players simultaneously choose whether to make an investment. Investment entails a personal \(\cos t\) of 3 ; not investing costs nothing. The investment choices become common knowledge. Then the players jointly decide whether to form a partnership firm and, if so, how to divide the profit from the firm. If both players invested, then the firm's profit is 16 . If exactly one player invested or if neither invested, then the firm's profit is 12 . If the players decide not to form the firm, then each player \(i\) gets a default payoff of \(x-3\) if player \(i\) invested and zero if player \(i\) did not invest. The default payoff of \(x-3\) includes the cost of investment plus some value \(x\) that represents what player \(i\) can obtain by using his investment in other endeavors. Assume that the players divide surplus according to the standard bargaining solution with equal bargaining weights. (a) What outcome maximizes the joint value? That is, what are the efficient investment choices? (b) Describe conditions on \(x\) such that there is a negotiation equilibrium in which both players invest. Show that this is an equilibrium. (c) In light of your answers to parts (a) and (b), briefly provide some intuition for your answers in relation to the "hold-up" problem.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free