Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider the following market game: An incumbent firm, called firm 3 , is already in an industry. Two potential entrants, called firms 1 and 2, can each enter the industry by paying the entry cost of 10 . First, firm 1 decides whether to enter or not. Then, after observing firm 1's choice, firm 2 decides whether to enter or not. Every firm, including firm 3, observes the choices of firms 1 and 2. After this, all of the firms in the industry (including firm 3) compete in a Cournot oligopoly, where they simultaneously and independently select quantities. The price is determined by the inverse demand curve \(p=12-Q\), where \(Q\) is the total quantity produced in the industry. Assume that the firms produce at no cost in this Cournot game. Thus, if firm \(i\) is in the industry and produces \(q_{i}\), then it earns a gross profit of \((12-Q) q_{i}\) in the Cournot phase. (Remember that firms 1 and 2 have to pay the fixed cost 10 to enter.) (a) Compute the subgame perfect equilibrium of this market game. Do so by first finding the equilibrium quantities and profits in the Cournot subgames. Show your answer by designating optimal actions on the tree and writing the complete subgame perfect equilibrium strategy profile. [Hint: In an \(n\)-firm Cournot oligopoly with demand \(p=12-Q\) and 0 costs, the Nash equilibrium entails each firm producing the quantity \(q=12 /(n+1) .]\) (b) In the subgame perfect equilibrium, which firms (if any) enter the industry?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Firm 1 does not enter, Firm 2 enters, and Firm 3 competes with Firm 2 in equilibrium.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Cournot Equilibrium

In the Cournot competition phase, we are given that the price is determined by the inverse demand curve \( p = 12 - Q \), where \( Q \) is the total quantity produced. In an \( n \)-firm Cournot oligopoly, each firm produces \( q = \frac{12}{n+1} \) and earns a profit \( \pi_i = q_i \times (12 - Q) \). The firms produce at no cost, but firms 1 and 2 incur a fixed entry cost of 10 if they choose to enter.
02

Subgame Analysis: Cournot Equilibrium Given Different Entrants

Firms can enter the market and face different environments based on how many firms are in the market:- **Three Firms (Firm 1, 2, and 3):** Profits for each firm \( \pi = \left(\frac{12}{4}\right)^2 = 9 \). Firms 1 and 2 would incur a net profit of -1 (since they must pay an entry cost of 10).- **Two Firms (Firm 1 or 2 and Firm 3):** Profits for each firm \( \pi = \left(\frac{12}{3}\right)^2 = 16 \). Entering firm has net profit 6; Firm 3 has profit 16.- **One Firm (Only Firm 3):** Firm 3 earns \( \pi = \left(\frac{12}{2}\right)^2 = 36 \).
03

Deciding Optimal Entry Actions for Firms 1 and 2

- **Firm 1's Decision:** If Firm 1 enters, Firm 2 observes and knows it would also enter, leading both Firms 1 and 2 to have -1 net profit. Hence, Firm 1 gains more if it does not enter (0 profit) rather than entering. - **Firm 2's Decision:** If Firm 1 does not enter, Firm 2 compares entering and earning net 6 or not entering for 0. It chooses to enter.
04

Determining the Subgame Perfect Equilibrium Strategy

Considering the best outcomes for each firm's decisions: - **Firm 1:** Chooses `Not Enter` to avoid negative profit. - **Firm 2:** Chooses `Enter` when Firm 1 does not enter since it earns net profit 6. - Firm 3 remains and reacts accordingly in both scenarios. In subgame perfect equilibrium, Firm 1 does not enter, Firm 2 enters, and Firm 3 competes in a Cournot duopoly with Firm 2.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Cournot Oligopoly
In the Cournot oligopoly model, firms compete by setting quantities rather than prices. This model is used to describe industries where firms decide how much of a product to produce independently and at the same time. Each firm's decision affects the market price, which in turn affects the profits of all firms.

In the context of the given exercise, when the firms enter the market, they engage in Cournot competition. The market price is determined by the inverse demand curve, expressed as \( p = 12 - Q \), where \( Q \) is the total output produced by all firms. Here, each firm produces at a quantity that maximizes its profit, taking into consideration the production quantities of the other firms.

Specifically, the Nash equilibrium for an \( n \)-firm Cournot oligopoly with zero costs and a demand of \( p = 12 - Q \) results in each firm producing:
  • \( q = \frac{12}{n+1} \)

Understanding the Cournot equilibrium is crucial because it illustrates how firms' production choices will ultimately determine the distribution of profits in the market.
Subgame Perfect Equilibrium
Subgame perfect equilibrium (SPE) is a refinement of Nash equilibrium, applicable in dynamic games where players make decisions at various stages. SPE requires that strategies constitute a Nash equilibrium in every subgame, ensuring credibility and consistency of the strategy across all stages of the game.

In the exercise, the decision process of firms 1 and 2 can be broken down into subgames. Firm 1 moves first, deciding whether to enter the market, while firm 2 observes this decision and chooses its action accordingly. This setup creates multiple subgames depending on firm 1's action.

Finding the SPE involves identifying optimal strategies for each decision point:
  • Firm 1 decides not to enter to avoid negative profits, knowing that entry would lead to a poor outcome when firm 2 also enters.
  • Firm 2 will enter if firm 1 does not, because entering alone with firm 3 in the market produces a positive net profit.

The outcome of SPE ensures that each firm's strategy is a best response given the subsequent actions in the subgames, leading to firm 1 staying out and firm 2 entering.
Market Entry Strategy
Deciding market entry is a strategic choice that firms must carefully assess by weighing costs and potential profits. The concept of a market entry strategy is about determining whether to enter an industry given the competitive landscape and the fixed costs associated with entry.

In the scenario provided, firms 1 and 2 must each decide if paying the fixed entry cost of 10 is justified by the prospective profits in the Cournot competition phase. Each firm evaluates its strategy based on:
  • Potential profits from entering the market.
  • The expected actions of other firms, particularly following the game theory models demonstrated by Nash equilibrium and subgame perfect equilibrium.
  • The effect of their decision on market dynamics, including the total number of competitors and market output.

Firm 1 opts out of entering to avoid a negative profit scenario when both firms enter, while firm 2 rationalizes entry when firm 1 does not, maximizing its profit outcome with fewer competitors.
Nash Equilibrium
Nash equilibrium, named after John Nash, refers to a situation where each player's strategy is optimal given the strategies of all other players. In this state, no player has anything to gain by unilaterally changing their own strategy.

In the market game described, Nash equilibrium occurs during the Cournot competition phase where each firm selects a quantity to produce. The absence of production costs and the given demand curve \( p = 12 - Q \) allow firms to compute their equilibrium strategies.

At Nash equilibrium:
  • Each firm's output choice maximizes its profit, considering competitors' quantities.
  • The derived production levels ensure that no single firm can improve its profit by altering its quantity unilaterally.

In this exercise, Nash equilibrium for production, with firm 1 not entering and firm 2 and 3 competing, leads to a stable output distribution where both firms produce equal, profit-maximizing quantities.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

This exercise extends the analysis of the Stackelberg duopoly game (from Chapter 15) to include fixed costs of production. The analysis produces a theory of limit quantity, which is a quantity the incumbent firm can produce that will induce the potential entrant to stay out of the market. Suppose two firms compete by selecting quantities \(q_{1}\) and \(q_{2}\), respectively, with the market price given by \(p=1000-3 q_{1}-3 q_{2}\). Firm 1 (the incumbent) is already in the market. Firm 2 (the potential entrant) must decide whether or not to enter and, if she enters, how much to produce. First the incumbent commits to its production level, \(q_{1}\). Then the potential entrant, having seen \(q_{1}\), decides whether to enter the industry. If firm 2 chooses to enter, then it selects its production level \(q_{2}\). Both firms have the cost function \(c\left(q_{i}\right)=100 q_{i}+F\), where \(F\) is a constant fixed cost. If firm 2 decides not to enter, then it obtains a payoff of 0 . Otherwise, it pays the cost of production, including the fixed cost. Note that firm \(i\) in the market earns a payoff of \(p q_{i}-c\left(q_{i}\right)\). (a) What is firm 2's optimal quantity as a function of \(q_{1}\), conditional on entry? (b) Suppose \(F=0\). Compute the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium of this game. Report equilibrium strategies as well as the outputs, profits, and price realized in equilibrium. This is the Stackelberg or entryaccommodating outcome. (c) Now suppose \(F>0\). Compute, as a function of \(F\), the level of \(q_{1}\) that would make entry unprofitable for firm 2. This is called the limit quantity. (d) Find the incumbent's optimal choice of output and the outcome of the game in the following cases: (i) \(F=18,723\), (ii) \(F=8,112\), (iii) \(F=1,728\), and (iv) \(F=108\). It will be easiest to use your answers from parts (b) and (c) here; in each case, compare firm 1's profit from limiting entry with its profit from accommodating entry.

This exercise will help you think about the relation between inflation and output in the macroeconomy. Suppose that the government of Tritonland can fix the inflation level \(\dot{p}\) by an appropriate choice of monetary policy. The rate of nominal wage increase, \(W\), however, is set not by the government but by an employer-union federation known as the ASE. The ASE would like real wages to remain constant. That is, if it could, it would set \(\dot{W}=\dot{p} .\) Specifically, given \(\dot{W}\) and \(\dot{p}\), the payoff of the ASE is given by \(u(\dot{W}, \dot{p})=-(\dot{W}-\dot{p})^{2}\). Real output \(y\) in Tritonland is given by the equation \(y=30+(\dot{p}-\dot{W}) .\) The government, perhaps representing its electorate, likes output more than it dislikes inflation. Given \(y\) and \(\dot{p}\), the government's payoff is \(v(y, \dot{p})=y-\dot{p} / 2-30\). The government and the ASE interact as follows. First, the ASE selects the rate of nominal wage increase. Then the government chooses its monetary policy (and hence sets inflation) after observing the nominal wage increases set by the ASE. Assume that \(0 \leq \dot{W} \leq 10\) and \(0 \leq \dot{p} \leq 10\). (a) Use backward induction to find the level of inflation \(\dot{p}\), nominal wage growth \(\dot{W}\), and output \(y\) that will prevail in Tritonland. If you are familiar with macroeconomics, explain the relationship between backward induction and "rational expectations" here. (b) Suppose that the government could commit to a particular monetary policy (and hence inflation rate) ahead of time. What inflation rate would the government set? How would the utilities of the government and the ASE compare in this case with that in part (a)? (c) In the "real world," how have governments attempted to commit to particular monetary policies? What are the risks associated with fixing monetary policy before learning about important events, such as the outcomes of wage negotiations?

Imagine a market setting with three firms. Firms 2 and 3 are already operating as monopolists in two different industries (they are not competitors). Firm 1 must decide whether to enter firm 2's industry and thus compete with firm 2 or enter firm 3's industry and thus compete with firm 3. Production in firm 2's industry occurs at zero cost, whereas the cost of production in firm 3's industry is 2 per unit. Demand in firm 2's industry is given by \(p=9-Q\), whereas demand in firm 3 's industry is given by \(p^{\prime}=14-Q^{\prime}\), where \(p\) and \(Q\) denote the price and total quantity in firm 2 's industry and \(p^{\prime}\) and \(Q^{\prime}\) denote the price and total quantity in firm 3 's industry. The game runs as follows: First, firm 1 chooses between \(\mathrm{E}^{2}\) and \(\mathrm{E}^{3}\). ( \(\mathrm{E}^{2}\) means "enter firm 2's industry" and \(\mathrm{E}^{3}\) means "enter firm 3's industry.") This choice is observed by firms 2 and 3 . Then, if firm 1 chooses \(\mathrm{E}^{2}\), firms 1 and 2 compete as Cournot duopolists, where they select quantities \(q_{1}\) and \(q_{2}\) simultaneously. In this case, firm 3 automatically gets the monopoly profit of 36 in its own industry. In contrast, if firm 1 chooses \(E^{3}\), then firms 1 and 3 compete as Cournot duopolists, where they select quantities \(q_{1}^{\prime}\) and \(q_{3}^{\prime}\) simultaneously; and in this case, firm 2 automatically gets its monopoly profit of \(81 / 4\). (a) Calculate and report the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium of this game. In the equilibrium, does firm 1 enter firm 2 's industry or firm 3 's industry? (b) Is there a Nash equilibrium (not necessarily subgame perfect) in which firm 1 selects \(E^{2}\) ? If so, describe it. If not, briefly explain why.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free