Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider a more general Cournot model than the one presented in this chapter. Suppose there are \(n\) firms. The firms simultaneously and independently select quantities to bring to the market. Firm \(i\) 's quantity is denoted \(q_{i}\), which is constrained to be greater than or equal to zero. All of the units of the good are sold, but the prevailing market price depends on the total quantity in the industry, which is \(Q=\sum_{i=1}^{n} q_{i}\). Suppose the price is given by \(p=a-b Q\) and suppose each firm produces with marginal cost \(c\). There is no fixed cost for the firms. Assume \(a>c>0\) and \(b>0\). Note that firm \(i\) 's profit is given by \(u_{i}=p(Q) q_{i}-c q_{i}=(a-b Q) q_{i}-c q_{i}\). Defining \(Q_{-i}\) as the sum of the quantities produced by all firms except firm \(i\), we have \(u_{i}=\left(a-b q_{i}-b Q_{-i}\right) q_{i}-c q_{i}\). Each firm maximizes its own profit. (a) Represent this game in the normal form by describing the strategy spaces and payoff functions. (b) Find firm \(i\) 's best-response function as a function of \(Q_{-i}\). Graph this function. (c) Compute the Nash equilibrium of this game. Report the equilibrium quantities, price, and total output. (Hint: Summing the best-response functions over the different players will help.) What happens to the equilibrium price and the firm's profits as \(n\) becomes large? (d) Show that for the Cournot duopoly game \((n=2)\), the set of rationalizable strategies coincides with the Nash equilibrium.

Short Answer

Expert verified
In equilibrium: \(q_i^* = \frac{a-c}{b(n+1)}\) per firm, total output \(Q = \frac{n(a-c)}{b(n+1)}\), price \(p \rightarrow c\) as \(n\) increases. For \(n=2\), Nash equilibrium matches rationalizable strategies.

Step by step solution

01

Define Strategy Spaces

In the Cournot model with \(n\) firms, each firm \(i\) chooses a quantity \(q_i \geq 0\) to produce. The strategy space for each firm is all non-negative quantities that can be produced. Let's denote firm \(i\)'s strategy space as \(S_i = \{ q_i \geq 0 \ \} \). The strategies for all firms together are represented by the set \(S = S_1 \times S_2 \times \cdots \times S_n \).
02

Define Payoff Functions

Firm \(i\)'s profit function given a production quantity \(q_i\) is \(u_i = (a-bQ)q_i - c q_i\), where total quantity \(Q = \sum_{j=1}^{n} q_j\). Simplifying, we get \(u_i = (a - bq_i - bQ_{-i})q_i - c q_i\), where \(Q_{-i} = \sum_{j eq i} q_j\). Each firm seeks to maximize its profit by selecting \(q_i\).
03

Derive Best-Response Function

Firm \(i\)'s profit \(u_i\) depends on \(q_i\). For maximizing profit, take the derivative of the profit function with respect to \(q_i\): \(\frac{\partial u_i}{\partial q_i} = a - 2bq_i - bQ_{-i} - c\). Setting it to zero gives the best-response function: \[ q_i^* = \frac{a - c - bQ_{-i}}{2b} \].
04

Graph the Best-Response Function

The best-response function \(q_i^* = \frac{a - c - bQ_{-i}}{2b}\) is a linear decreasing function in terms of \(Q_{-i}\). On a graph with \(q_i\) on the vertical axis and \(Q_{-i}\) on the horizontal axis, plot the line showing the relationship.
05

Compute Nash Equilibrium

To find the Nash equilibrium, substitute \(q_i^*\) in symmetrically for all firms: \(n q_i^* = Q = \sum_{i=1}^{n} q_i = \sum_{i=1}^{n} \left (\frac{a - c}{b(n+1)} \right ) = \frac{n(a - c)}{b(n+1)}\). Solving gives equilibrium quantity for each firm as \(q_i^* = \frac{a - c}{b(n+1)}\). The equilibrium price is \(p = a - bQ = a - b \left(\frac{n(a - c)}{b(n+1)}\right)\).
06

Analyze Effect of Increasing \(n\)

As \(n\) increases, equilibrium quantity for each firm \(q_i^* = \frac{a - c}{b(n+1)}\) decreases, and total output \(Q = \frac{n(a - c)}{b(n+1)}\) approaches \(a/b\). The market price approaches \(c\), reducing each firm's profit because the price converges with their marginal cost.
07

Cournot Duopoly and Rationalizable Strategies

For two firms (\(n=2\)), set \(q_1^* = \frac{a-c-bq_2}{2b}\) and \(q_2^* = \frac{a-c-bq_1}{2b}\). Solving this system gives \(q_1^* = q_2^* = \frac{a-c}{3b}\) and \(Q = \frac{2(a-c)}{3b}\), which is the Nash equilibrium. In this duopoly, these strategies are also the set of rationalizable strategies as no other strategy can yield a higher payoff assuming rationality.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Nash Equilibrium
The Nash Equilibrium is a concept in game theory where each player's strategy is optimal given the strategies of all other players. In the Cournot model, this means each firm selects a quantity to produce such that no firm can increase its profit by unilaterally changing its production quantity. In our example, the Nash Equilibrium can be calculated by finding the point where the best-response functions of all firms intersect. Here, each firm decides on the quantity to produce based on the quantities chosen by the other firms.

This results in an equilibrium where every firm is producing at a level that maximizes their profit, given the competition's output. If a firm produces more or less, it could decrease its profit. Thus, at Nash Equilibrium, the mutual best responses result in stable output quantities for each firm in the market.
Cournot Model
The Cournot Model is a foundational game theory model that describes an industry with firms competing by selecting quantities to produce. This model assumes that each firm makes its decision simultaneously and independently, with a focus on how much to produce rather than the price.

The key feature of the Cournot Model is that the market price is determined by the total output produced by all firms. The firms are aware of this and strategically choose their production levels to maximize their profits.
  • Each firm's decision impacts the market price.
  • The model assumes firms produce a homogeneous product.
  • Firms base their production on the predicted behavior of competitors.
This model helps us understand how firms' output decisions affect market dynamics and how equilibrium is achieved in oligopolistic markets.
Strategy Space
In game theory, a strategy space refers to the set of all possible actions a player can choose from in a game. In the Cournot model, the strategy space for each firm consists of all non-negative quantities they can produce.

Each firm determines its strategy by considering potential quantities and identifying the one that maximizes its profit. The strategy space is essential because it defines the range of possible actions each firm can take.
  • The strategy space is constrained, meaning firms cannot produce negative quantities.
  • Every firm's strategy depends on expectations about rival firms' quantities.
  • The collective strategy space of the firms shapes the competitive landscape.
This space interlinks with the payoff function, guiding firms to optimal choices in terms of production quantities.
Profit Maximization
Profit maximization is the process by which firms determine the level of output that will produce the highest possible profit. In the context of the Cournot model, each firm aims to choose a production quantity that maximizes its profit given the constraints of market pricing and competitor actions.

The profit function for a firm is based on the difference between total revenue and total cost. For the Cournot model, this involves calculating revenue based on the market price, which decreases as total market output increases. Firms adjust their output in response to competitors to ensure they are operating at their profit-maximizing level.
  • Firms analyze the marginal cost and marginal revenue for optimal output.
  • Profit maximization often requires firms to predict rivals’ behaviors accurately.
  • Maximizing profit isn’t just about perfect output amounts; it’s about responsiveness to the entire market environment.
Ultimately, achieving profit maximization is a dynamic process that requires evaluating both current market conditions and competitor strategies.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An island has two reefs that are suitable for fishing, and there are twenty fishers who simultaneously and independently choose at which of the two reefs ( 1 or 2 ) to fish. Each fisher can fish at only one reef. The total number of fish harvested at a single reef depends on the number of fishers who choose to fish there. The total catch is equally divided between the fishers at the reef. At reef 1 , the total harvest is given by \(f_{1}\left(r_{1}\right)=8 r_{1}-\frac{r_{1}^{2}}{2}\), where \(r_{1}\) is the number of fishers who select reef 1 . For reef 2 , the total catch is \(f_{2}\left(r_{2}\right)=4 r_{2}\), where \(r_{2}\) is the number of fishers who choose reef 2 . Assume that each fisher wants to maximize the number of fish that he or she catches. (a) Find the Nash equilibrium of this game. In equilibrium, what is the total number of fish caught? (b) The chief of the island asks his economics advisor whether this arrangement is efficient (i.e., whether the equilibrium allocation of fishers among reefs maximizes the number of fish caught). What is the answer to the chief's question? What is the efficient number of fishers at each reef? (c) The chief decides to require a fishing license for reef 1 , which would require each fisher who fishes there to pay the chief \(x\) fish. Find the Nash equilibrium of the resulting location-choice game between the fishers. Is there a value of \(x\) such that the equilibrium choices of the fishers results in an efficient outcome? If so, what is this value of \(x\) ?

In the years 2000 and 2001 , the bubble burst for many Internet and computer firms. As they closed shop, some of the firms had to liquidate sizable assets, such as inventories of products. Suppose eToys is going out of business and the company seeks a buyer for a truckload of Elmo dolls in its warehouse. Imagine that eToys holds an auction on eBay to sell the dolls and that two retailers (players 1 and 2 ) will bid for them. The rules of the auction are as follows: the retailers simultaneously and independently submit sealed bids and then eToys gives the merchandise to the highest bidder, who must pay his bid. It is common knowledge that the retailer who obtains the load of dolls can resell the load for a total of \(\$ 15,000\). Thus, if player \(i\) wins the auction with bid \(b_{i}\), then player \(i\) 's payoff is \(\$ 15,000-b_{i}\). The losing retailer gets a payoff of \(\$ 0\). If the retailers make the same bids \(\left(b_{1}=b_{2}\right)\), then eToys declares each player the winner with probability \(1 / 2\), in which case player \(i\) obtains an expected payoff of \((1 / 2)\left(15,000-b_{i}\right)\). What will be the winning bid in the Nash equilibrium of this auction game? If you can, describe the equilibrium strategies and briefly explain why this is an equilibrium. (Hint: This is similar to the Bertrand game.)

Consider an asymmetric Cournot duopoly game, where the two firms have different costs of production. Firm 1 selects quantity \(q_{1}\) at a production cost of \(2 q_{1}\). Firm 2 selects quantity \(q_{2}\) and pays the production cost \(4 q_{2}\). The market price is given by \(p=12-q_{1}-q_{2}\). Thus, the payoff functions are \(u_{1}\left(q_{1}, q_{2}\right)=\left(12-q_{1}-q_{2}\right) q_{1}-2 q_{1}\) and \(u_{2}\left(q_{1}, q_{2}\right)=\left(12-q_{1}-q_{2}\right) q_{2}-4 q_{2}\). Calculate the firms' best-response functions \(B R_{1}\left(q_{2}\right)\) and \(B R_{2}\left(q_{1}\right)\), and find the Nash equilibrium of this game.

Consider a game that has a continuum of players. In particular, the players are uniformly distributed on the interval \([0,1]\). (See Appendix A for the definition of uniform distribution.) Each \(x \in[0,1]\) represents an individual player; that is, we can identify a player by her location on the interval \([0,1]\). In the game, the players simultaneously and independently select either \(\mathrm{F}\) or G. The story is that each player is choosing a type of music software to buy, where \(\mathrm{F}\) and \(\mathrm{G}\) are the competing brands. The players have different values of the two brands; they also have a preference for buying what other people are buying (either because they want to be in fashion or they find it easier to exchange music with others who use the same software). The following payoff function represents these preferences. If player \(x\) selects \(\mathrm{G}\), then her payoff is the constant \(g\). If player \(x\) selects \(\mathrm{F}\), then her payoff is \(2 m-c x\), where \(c\) is a constant and \(m\) is the fraction of players who select F. Note that \(m\) is between 0 and 1 . (a) Consider the case in which \(g=1\) and \(c=0\). What are the rationalizable strategies for the players? Is there a symmetric Nash equilibrium, in which all of the players play the same strategy? If so, describe such an equilibrium. (b) Next, consider the case in which \(g=1\) and \(c=2\). Calculate the rationalizable strategy profiles and show your steps. (Hint: Let \(\bar{m}\) denote an upper bound on the fraction of players who rationally select \(\mathrm{F}\). Use this variable in your analysis.) (c) Describe the rationalizable strategy profiles for the case in which \(g=-1\) and \(c=4\). (Hint: Let \(\bar{m}\) denote an upper bound on the fraction of players who rationally select \(\mathrm{F}\) and let \(\underline{m}\) denote a lower bound on the fraction of players who rationally select F.)

Consider a game in which, simultaneously, player 1 selects a number \(x \in[0,6]\) and player 2 selects a number \(y \in[0,6]\). The payoffs are given by: $$ \begin{aligned} &u_{1}(x, y)=\frac{16 x}{y+2}-x^{2} \\ &u_{2}(x, y)=\frac{16 y}{x+2}-y^{2} \end{aligned} $$ (a) Calculate each player's best-response function as a function of the opposing player's pure strategy. (b) Find and report the Nash equilibrium of the game. (c) Suppose that there is no social institution to coordinate the players on an equilibrium. Suppose that each player knows that the other player is rational, but this is not common knowledge. What is the largest set of strategies for player 1 that is consistent with this assumption?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free