Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Why does a change in income cause a parallel shift in the budget constraint?

Short Answer

Expert verified
A change in income causes a parallel shift in the budget constraint because when income changes, both the intercepts of the budget constraint change, but the slope remains the same. This means that the new budget constraint line will be parallel to the initial one, with an increase in income shifting the constraint line outward and a decrease in income shifting it inward.

Step by step solution

01

Define the budget constraint

A budget constraint represents the combinations of two goods that can be consumed by an individual given their income and the prices of the goods. Mathematically, the budget constraint is represented as: \(I = P_1Q_1 + P_2Q_2\) Where: - \(I\) is the consumer's income - \(P_1\) is the price of good 1 - \(Q_1\) is the quantity of good 1 consumed - \(P_2\) is the price of good 2 - \(Q_2\) is the quantity of good 2 consumed The budget constraint can be rearranged to isolate \(Q_2\), giving: \(Q_2= \frac{I}{P_2} - \frac{P_1}{P_2}Q_1\)
02

Graph the budget constraint

The budget constraint can be graphed as a straight line with good 1 quantity (\(Q_1\)) on the x-axis and good 2 quantity (\(Q_2\)) on the y-axis. The intercepts and slope of the line are determined by the income and prices of the goods. - The intercept of good 2 on the y-axis is \(\frac{I}{P_2}\) (when \(Q_1=0\)) - The intercept of good 1 on the x-axis is \(\frac{I}{P_1}\) (when \(Q_2=0\)) - The slope of the budget constraint line is \(-\frac{P_1}{P_2}\)
03

Show the effect of a change in income

Now, let's consider a change in income, say, the income increases to \(I'\). The new budget constraint equation will be: \(I' = P_1Q_1 + P_2Q_2\) If we isolate \(Q_2\) again, we get: \(Q_2= \frac{I'}{P_2} - \frac{P_1}{P_2}Q_1\) Notably: - The slope of the new budget constraint line, \(-\frac{P_1}{P_2}\), remains the same - The intercept of good 2 on the y-axis increases to \(\frac{I'}{P_2}\) - The intercept of good 1 on the x-axis increases to \(\frac{I'}{P_1}\)
04

Explain the parallel shift

As we have seen from the equations, when income changes, both intercepts of the budget constraint change, but the slope remains the same. This implies that the new budget constraint line is parallel to the old budget constraint line. In other words, a change in income causes a parallel shift in the budget constraint line. An increase in income will shift the budget constraint line outwards, while a decrease in income will shift the budget constraint line inwards.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

As a general rule, is it safe to assume that a change in the price of a good will always have its most significant impact on the quantity demanded of that good, rather than on the quantity demanded of other goods? Explain.

Praxilla, who lived in ancient Greece, derives utility from reading poems and from eating cucumbers. Praxilla gets 30 units of marginal utility from her first poem, 27 units of marginal utility from her second poem, 24 units of marginal utility from her third poem, and so on, with marginal utility declining by three units for each additional poem. Praxilla gets six units of marginal utility for each of her first three cucumbers consumed, five units of marginal utility for each of her next three cucumbers consumed, four units of marginal utility for each of the following three cucumbers consumed, and so on, with marginal utility declining by one for every three cucumbers consumed. A poem costs three bronze coins but a cucumber costs only one bronze coin. Praxilla has 18 bronze coins. Sketch Praxilla’s budget set between poems and cucumbers, placing poems on the vertical axis and cucumbers on the horizontal axis. Start off with the choice of zero poems and 18 cucumbers, and calculate the changes in marginal utility of moving along the budget line to the next choice of one poem and 15 cucumbers. Using this step-bystep process based on marginal utility, create a table and identify Praxilla’s utility-maximizing choice. Compare the marginal utility of the two goods and the relative prices at the optimal choice to see if the expected relationship holds. Hint: Label the table columns: 1) Choice, 2) Marginal Gain from More Poems, 3) Marginal Loss from Fewer Cucumbers, 4) Overall Gain or Loss, 5) Is the previous choice optimal? Label the table rows: 1) 0 Poems and 18 Cucumbers, 2) 1 Poem and 15 Cucumbers, 3) 2 Poems and 12 Cucumbers, 4) 3 Poems and 9 Cucumbers, 5) 4 Poems and 6 Cucumbers, 6) 5 Poems and 3 Cucumbers, 7) 6 Poems and 0 Cucumbers.

In the labor-leisure choice model, what is the price of leisure?

How would an increase in expected income over one’s lifetime affect one’s intertemporal budget constraint? How would it affect one’s consumption/saving decision?

According to the model of intertemporal choice, what are the major factors which determine how much saving an individual will do? What factors might a behavioral economist use to explain savings decisions?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free