Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In Japan, one worker can make 5 tons of rubber or 80 radios. In Malaysia, one worker can make 10 tons of rubber or 40 radios.

a. Who has the absolute advantage in the production of rubber or radios? How can you tell?

b. Calculate the opportunity cost of producing 80 additional radios in Japan and in Malaysia. (Your calculation may involve fractions, which is fine.) Which country has a comparative advantage in the production of radios?

c. Calculate the opportunity cost of producing 10 additional tons of rubber in Japan and in Malaysia. Which country has a comparative advantage in producing rubber?

d. In this example, does each country have an absolute advantage and a comparative advantage in the same good?

e. In what product should Japan specialize? In what product should Malaysia specialize?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. Japan- Radios, Malaysia- Rubber

b. Japan- 5, Malaysia- 20, Japan

c. Japan- 160, Malaysia- 40, Malaysia

d. Yes

e. Japan- Radios, Malaysia- Rubber

Step by step solution

01

Step1. Given information

The output table as given in the question is:


RubberRadios
Japan580
Malaysia1040
02

Step2. Absolute Advantage

a)

According to Absolute Advantage theory, which country can produce more as compared to other country given the same resources (in terms of labor hours) used.

Hence, Japan can produce more (80>40) Radios and Malaysia can produce more (10>5) Rubber. So, they have respective absolute advantage than the other country.

03

Step3. b) Opportunity Cost

b)

Following is the Opportunity cost table:


RubberRadios
Japan80/55/80
Malaysia40/1010/40

Opportunity cost for producing 80 radios:

Japan- 80* 5/80= 5 units rubber

Malaysia= 80* 10/40= 20 units rubber

Lower the opportunity cost, higher is the comparative advantage. Hence, Japan has the comparative advantage.

04

Step4. c)Opportunity Cost

c)

From the above opportunity cost table,

opportunity cost for producing 10 units rubber:

Japan- 10* 80/5= 160

Malaysia- 10* 40/10= 40

Hence, Malaysia has comparative advantage as it has lower opportunity cost than Japan.

05

Step5. Explanation

d)

As from the above explanation, each country has comparative and absolute advantage in the same good, i.e. Japan has in Radios and Malaysia has in Rubber.

06

Step6. Implication

e)

It can hence be implied from above calculation and explanation that Japan should specialize in Radio production and Malaysia should specialize in Rubber production.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

You just overheard your friend say the following:

โ€œPoor countries like Malawi have no absolute

advantages. They have poor soil, low investments in formal education, and hence low-skill workers, no capital, and no natural resources to speak of. Because they have no advantage, they cannot benefit from trade.โ€ How would you respond?

In World Trade Organization meetings, what do

you think low-income countries lobby for?

Consider two countries: South Korea and Taiwan. Taiwan can produce one million mobile phones per day at the cost of \(10 per phone and South Korea can produce 50 million mobile phones at \)5 per phone. Assume these phones are the same type and quality and there is only one price. What is the minimum price at which both countries will engage in trade?

Is it possible to have a comparative advantage in

the production of a good but not to have an absolute advantage? Explain.

If trade increases world GDP by 1% per year, what is the global impact of this increase over 10 years? How does this increase compare to the annual GDP of a country like Sri Lanka? Discuss. Hint: To answer this question, here are steps you may want to consider. Go to the World Development Indicators (online) published by the World Bank. Find the current level of World GDP in constant international dollars. Also, find the GDP of Sri Lanka in constant international dollars. Once you have these two numbers, compute the amount the additional increase in global incomes due to trade and compare that number to Sri Lankaโ€™s GDP.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free