Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Look at Table 19.9. Is there a range of trades for

which there will be no gains?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Both Mexico and the US have to decide between shoes and refrigerators.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Definition

The ability to produce a good or service at a lower opprtunity cost than others is referred to as comaprative advantage. Those who enjoy a comaprative advantage in the production of a good or service can specialize in that good.

02

Step 2. Explanation

See from the table it is known that the USA has a comparative advantage in refrigerators and Mexico has a comparative advantage in shoe production.

So, if Mexico has to be done a profitable trade, they have to export shoes more than 4000 and need to import more than 5000 refrigerators to balance the trade.

And the USA must export more than 20000 refrigerators and need to import more than 5000 shoes to be on the side of beneficial trade.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What is splitting up the value chain?

Review the numbers for Canada and Venezuela from Table 19.12 which describes how many barrels of oil and tons of lumber the workers can produce. Use these numbers to answer the rest of this question.

a. Draw a production possibilities frontier for each country. Assume there are 100 workers in each country. Canadians and Venezuelans desire both oil and lumber. Canadians want at least 2,000 tons of lumber. Mark a point on their production possibilities where they can get at least 3,000 tons.

b. Assume that the Canadians specialize completely because they figured out they have a comparative advantage in lumber. They are

willing to give up 1,000 tons of lumber. How much oil should they ask for in return for this lumber to be as well off as they were with no trade? How much should they ask for if they want to gain from trading with Venezuela? Note: We can think of this โ€œaskโ€ as the relative price or trade price of lumber.

c. Is the Canadian โ€œaskโ€ you identified in (b) also beneficial for Venezuelans? Use the production possibilities frontier graph for Venezuela to show that Venezuelans can gain from trade.

Under what conditions does comparative advantage

lead to gains from trade?

In France it takes one worker to produce one sweater, and one worker to produce one bottle of wine. In Tunisia it takes two workers to produce one sweater, and three workers to produce one bottle of wine. Who has the absolute advantage in production of sweaters? Who has the absolute advantage in the production of wine? How can you tell?

Consider two countries: South Korea and Taiwan. Taiwan can produce one million mobile phones per day at the cost of \(10 per phone and South Korea can produce 50 million mobile phones at \)5 per phone. Assume these phones are the same type and quality and there is only one price. What is the minimum price at which both countries will engage in trade?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free