Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Is it possible to have a comparative advantage in

the production of a good but not to have an absolute advantage? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Yes, it is possible to have a comparative advantage in the production of a good but not to have an absolute advantage.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Definition

The ability to produces a good with a smaller quantity of inputs, or to produce more output per unit of input is referred to as absolute advantage.

The ability to produce a good or service at a lower opportunity cost is known as comparative advantage.

02

Step 2. Explanation

Absolute advantage means using minimum resources to produce the good. Comparative means incurring opportunity cost to produce the good.

A person may incur minum opportunity cost but does not necessarily can also produce using minimum resources.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Review the numbers for Canada and Venezuela from Table 19.12 which describes how many barrels of oil and tons of lumber the workers can produce. Use these numbers to answer the rest of this question.

a. Draw a production possibilities frontier for each country. Assume there are 100 workers in each country. Canadians and Venezuelans desire both oil and lumber. Canadians want at least 2,000 tons of lumber. Mark a point on their production possibilities where they can get at least 3,000 tons.

b. Assume that the Canadians specialize completely because they figured out they have a comparative advantage in lumber. They are

willing to give up 1,000 tons of lumber. How much oil should they ask for in return for this lumber to be as well off as they were with no trade? How much should they ask for if they want to gain from trading with Venezuela? Note: We can think of this โ€œaskโ€ as the relative price or trade price of lumber.

c. Is the Canadian โ€œaskโ€ you identified in (b) also beneficial for Venezuelans? Use the production possibilities frontier graph for Venezuela to show that Venezuelans can gain from trade.

In World Trade Organization meetings, what do

you think low-income countries lobby for?

True or False: The source of comparative advantage must be natural elements like climate and mineral deposits. Explain.

What is splitting up the value chain?

In France it takes one worker to produce one sweater, and one worker to produce one bottle of wine. In Tunisia it takes two workers to produce one sweater, and three workers to produce one bottle of wine. Who has the absolute advantage in production of sweaters? Who has the absolute advantage in the production of wine? How can you tell?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free