Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

What arguments do low-income countries make in international discussions of global environmental clean-up?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The arguments made by low-income countries in international discussions of global environmental clean-up are their first priority is economic development and not a reduction of pollution.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. High-income and low-income countries.

High-income countries want low-income countries to reduce pollution. They will help them providing them a part of the expenditure and providing necessary technologies.

02

Step 2. The arguments made by low-income countries.

The arguments made by low-income countries in international discussions of global environmental clean-up are their first priority is economic development and not a reduction of pollution.

The low-income countries are arguing that the high-income countries produce pollution by burning fossil fuels for development and cause global warming. They also argue that their priority is economic development i.e. health, education, adequate diet and they cannot trade that for a cleaner environment.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What does a point inside the production possibility frontier represent?

What are the economic tradeoffs between low-income and high-income countries in international conferences on global environmental damage?

Consider the case of global environmental problems that spill across international borders as a prisonerโ€™s dilemma of the sort studied in Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Say that there are two countries, A and B. Each country can choose whether to protect the environment, at a cost of 10, or not to protect it, at a cost of zero. If

one country decides to protect the environment, there is a benefit of 16, but the benefit is divided equally between the two countries. If both countries decide to protect the environment, there is a benefit of 32, which is divided equally

between the two countries.

a. In Table 12.10, fill in the costs, benefits, and total payoffs to the countries of the following decisions. Explain why, without some international agreement, they are likely to end up with neither country acting to protect the

environment.

Identify the following situations as an example of a negative or a positive externality:

a. You are a birder (bird watcher), and your neighbor has put up several birdhouses in the yard as well as planting trees and flowers that attract birds.

b. Your neighbor paints his house a hideous color.

c. Investments in private education raise your countryโ€™s standard of living.

d. Trash dumped upstream flows downstream right past your home.

e. Your roommate is a smoker, but you are a nonsmoker.

What are better-defined property rights and what incentive do they provide to account for external costs?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free