Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Is it possible to have a comparative advantage in the production of a good but not to have an absolute advantage? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, it is possible to have a comparative advantage in the production of a good without having an absolute advantage. Comparative advantage occurs when a producer can produce a good at a lower opportunity cost compared to another producer, whereas absolute advantage refers to a producer being able to produce more units of a good using the same resources compared to another producer. In some cases, a producer might have a lower opportunity cost for producing a particular good, giving them a comparative advantage, even though they may not be able to produce more of that good using the same resources as another producer, thus not having an absolute advantage.

Step by step solution

01

Define Comparative Advantage and Absolute Advantage:

Comparative advantage occurs when a producer can produce a good at a lower opportunity cost compared to another producer. Opportunity cost is the cost of production in terms of the next best alternative forgone. Absolute advantage, on the other hand, occurs when a producer can produce more units of a good using the same amount of resources compared to another producer.
02

Provide an Example:

Let's consider two countries, Country A and Country B, that produce two goods: Apples and Bananas. The production possibilities for both countries are given in the table below: | **Country** | **Apples (in tons)** | **Bananas (in tons)** | |-------------|----------------------|-----------------------| | A | 6 | 3 | | B | 4 | 2 |
03

Calculate Opportunity Costs:

First, we will calculate the opportunity cost of producing each good in both countries: - For Country A, the opportunity cost of producing 1 ton of Apples is \(\frac{3}{6} = 0.5\) tons of Bananas, and the opportunity cost of producing 1 ton of Bananas is \(\frac{6}{3} = 2\) tons of Apples. - For Country B, the opportunity cost of producing 1 ton of Apples is \(\frac{2}{4} = 0.5\) tons of Bananas, and the opportunity cost of producing 1 ton of Bananas is \(\frac{4}{2} = 2\) tons of Apples.
04

Determine Comparative and Absolute Advantages:

Now, we can identify the comparative and absolute advantages for each country in producing both goods: - Country A has an absolute advantage in producing Apples (6 > 4), and it also has an absolute advantage in producing Bananas (3 > 2). - However, both countries have the same opportunity costs for producing each good, so neither Country A nor Country B has a comparative advantage in production of either good. In this example, Country A has an absolute advantage in both goods, but no comparative advantage exists between these two countries.
05

Conclusion:

It is possible for a producer to have a comparative advantage but not an absolute advantage. If a producer can produce a good at a lower opportunity cost than another producer, they have a comparative advantage, even if they can't produce more of that good using the same resources (absolute advantage). In the above example, we didn't find a situation where a producer had comparative advantage without absolute advantage, but it is possible in various other scenarios.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What is absolute advantage? What is comparative advantage?

France and Tunisia both have Mediterranean 3 climates that are excellent for producing/harvesting green beans and tomatoes. In France it takes two hours for each worker to harvest green beans and two hours to the harvest a tomato. Tunisian workers need only one hour to harvest the tomatoes but four hours to harvest green beans. Assume there are only two workers, one in each country, and each works 40 hours a week. a. Draw a production possibilities frontier for each country. Hint: Remember the production possibility frontier is the maximum that all workers can produce at a unit of time which, in this problem, is a week. b. Identify which country has the absolute advantage in green beans and which country has the absolute advantage in tomatoes. c. Identify which country has the comparative advantage. d. How much would France have to give up in terms of tomatoes to gain from trade? How much would it have to give up in terms of green beans?

In World Trade Organization meetings, what do you think low-income countries lobby for?

Why might a low-income country put up barriers to trade, such as tariffs on imports?

Brazil can produce 100 pounds of beef or 10 autos. In contrast the United States can produce 40 pounds of beef or 30 autos. Which country has the absolute advantage in beef? Which country has the absolute advantage in producing autos? What is the opportunity cost of producing one pound of beef in Brazil? What is the opportunity cost of producing one pound of beef in the United States?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free