Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

As the extent of environmental protection expands, would you expect the marginal benefits of environmental protection to rise or fall? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified
As the extent of environmental protection expands, we can expect the marginal benefits of these efforts to fall due to the concept of diminishing marginal returns. The initial units of protection contribute to significant improvements, while subsequent units add progressively less value. This occurs because, after a certain point, the additional benefits from increasing the level of environmental protection will become smaller compared to the benefits gained in the initial stages. Nevertheless, continued environmental protection is essential for the sustainability and health of our environment.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the terms

First, let's define the terms used in the exercise: - Extent of environmental protection: The amount or scale of actions taken to protect and preserve the environment. - Marginal benefits: The additional benefits received from each extra unit of environmental protection. It quantifies the change in total benefits as a result of increasing the level of protection by one unit.
02

Consider the effects of increasing environmental protection

As we increase the extent of environmental protection, we may initially observe some significant positive effects on various aspects of the environment, such as clean air and water, the preservation of biodiversity, soil quality, etc. These improvements usually lead to an increase in the quality of human life, health benefits, and a more sustainable economy.
03

Analyze Diminishing Marginal Returns

The concept of diminishing marginal returns is crucial to understanding the relationship between the extent of environmental protection and the resulting marginal benefits. In economics, it is a common observation that the marginal benefits of any activity or resource allocation tend to decrease as the amount of that activity/resource increases. This is because the initial units often contribute to the most significant improvements, while the subsequent units add progressively less value.
04

Estimate the trend of marginal benefits

Based on the concept of diminishing marginal returns, we can expect that as the extent of environmental protection expands, the marginal benefits of these efforts will generally fall. The reason for this is that, after a certain point, the additional benefits from increasing the level of environmental protection will become smaller in comparison to the benefits gained in the initial stages.
05

Provide an example

For example, suppose there is a polluted river that needs cleaning. The first few rounds of pollution control measures, such as treating sewage and restricting industrial waste disposal, will result in significant water quality improvements and substantial benefits for the local ecosystem and community. However, after the initial cleanup, the benefits of further cleaning efforts will decrease, as the remaining pollution sources will have a lesser impact on water quality and the overall health of the ecosystem. In conclusion, it is reasonable to expect that the marginal benefits of environmental protection will fall as the extent of protection efforts increases, mainly due to the diminishing marginal returns. Nonetheless, it is crucial to recognize the importance of continued environmental protection and the need for a balanced approach to ensure a sustainable and healthy environment for future generations.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the case of global environmental problems that spill across international borders as a prisoner's dilemma of the sort studied in Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Say that there are two countries, A and B. Each country can choose whether to protect the environment, at a cost of \(10,\) or not to protect it, at a cost of zero. If one country decides to protect the environment, there is a benefit of \(16,\) but the benefit is divided equally between the two countries. If both countries decide to protect the environment, there is a benefit of \(32,\) which is divided equally between the two countries. a. In Table \(12.10,\) fill in the costs, benefits, and total payoffs to the countries of the following decisions. Explain why, without some international agreement, they are likely to end up with neither country acting to protect the environment.

Table 12.5 provides the supply and demand conditions for a manufacturing firm. The third column represents a supply curve without accounting for the social cost of pollution. The fourth column represents the supply curve when the firm is required to account for the social cost of pollution. Identify the equilibrium before the social cost of production is included and after the social cost of production is included. $$\begin{array}{l|l|ll}\hline \text { Price } & \begin{array}{l}\text { Quantity } \\\\\text { Demanded }\end{array} & \begin{array}{l}\text { Quantity Supplied without paying } \\\\\text { the cost of the pollution }\end{array} & \begin{array}{c}\text { Quantity Supplied after paying } \\\\\text { the cost of the pollution }\end{array} \\\\\hline \$ 10 & 450 & 400 & 250 \\\\\hline \$ 15 & 440 & 440 & 290 \\\\\hline \$ 20 & 430 & 480 & 330 \\\\\hline \$ 25 & 420 &520 & 370 \\\\\hline \$ 30 & 410 & 560 & 410 \\\\\hline\end{array}$$

An emissions tax on a quantity of emissions from a firm is not a command-and- control approach to reducing pollution. Why?

How can high-income countries benefit from covering much of the cost of reducing pollution created by low-income countries?

Show the market for cigarettes in equilibrium, assuming that there are no laws banning smoking in public. Label the equilibrium private market price and quantity as \(\mathrm{Pm}\) and \(\mathrm{Qm}\). Add whatever is needed to the model to show the impact of the negative externality from second-hand smoking. (Hint: In this case it is the consumers, not the sellers, who are creating the negative externality.) Label the social optimal output and price as Pe and Qe. On the graph, shade in the deadweight loss at the market output.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free