Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

As the extent of environmental protection expands, would you expect marginal costs of environmental protection to rise or fall? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified
As the extent of environmental protection expands, the marginal cost of environmental protection is likely to rise, primarily because easy and low-cost measures are implemented first, while more complicated and expensive options follow. Additionally, the law of diminishing returns and technological limitations contribute to increasing marginal costs. However, it is possible for marginal costs to fall in some cases, such as technological advancements or achieving economies of scale.

Step by step solution

01

1. Define Marginal Cost

The marginal cost represents the additional cost of producing one more unit of a good or service. In this context, the marginal cost refers to the additional cost of implementing environmental protection measures to improve the environment by one unit.
02

2. What is Environmental Protection?

Environmental protection refers to the efforts and measures taken to conserve and safeguard natural resources, ecosystems, and the overall environment from the potential harm caused by human activities. Examples of environmental protection measures include recycling, reducing emissions, and preserving habitats.
03

3. Relationship between Extent of Environmental Protection and Marginal Cost

As the extent of environmental protection expands, it means that more measures are being implemented to protect the environment. As a result, the marginal cost of environmental protection is likely to change.
04

4. Reasons for Marginal Cost to Rise

The marginal cost of environmental protection is expected to rise in most cases as the extent of protection expands, due to the following reasons: a) Easy and low-cost measures are typically implemented first, and as protection expands, more complicated and expensive options need to be employed. b) The law of diminishing returns states that as more resources are allocated to an activity, the additional benefits from each additional input will decrease. As more efforts are put into environmental protection, the additional gains from each additional measure may be less significant, increasing the marginal cost. c) Some environmental measures might face technological limitations, leading to higher costs for further improvements.
05

5. Reasons for Marginal Cost to Fall (Uncommon)

It is less common for marginal costs of environmental protection to fall as the extent of protection expands, but some scenarios can lead to a reduction: a) Technological advancements may develop more efficient and cost-effective ways to protect the environment, which in turn, would lower the marginal cost. b) Economies of scale, wherein large-scale operations become more cost-efficient, could potentially lead to a decrease in marginal costs.
06

6. Conclusion

In summary, as the extent of environmental protection expands, the marginal cost of environmental protection is likely to rise due to the implementation of more complex and expensive measures and the law of diminishing returns, among other factors. However, there may be some cases in which the marginal costs could decrease, such as technological advancements or economies of scale.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What is the difference between private costs and social costs?

Can extreme levels of pollution hurt the economic development of a high-income country? Why or why not?

Identify the following situations as an example of a negative or a positive externality: a. You are a birder (bird watcher), and your neighbor has put up several birdhouses in the yard as well as planting trees and flowers that attract birds. b. Your neighbor paints his house a hideous color. c. Investments in private education raise your country's standard of living. d. Trash dumped upstream flows downstream right past your home. e. Your roommate is a smoker, but you are a nonsmoker.

What is a marketable permit and what incentive does it provide for a firm to account for external costs?

Consider the case of global environmental problems that spill across international borders as a prisoner's dilemma of the sort studied in Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Say that there are two countries, A and B. Each country can choose whether to protect the environment, at a cost of \(10,\) or not to protect it, at a cost of zero. If one country decides to protect the environment, there is a benefit of \(16,\) but the benefit is divided equally between the two countries. If both countries decide to protect the environment, there is a benefit of \(32,\) which is divided equally between the two countries. a. In Table \(12.10,\) fill in the costs, benefits, and total payoffs to the countries of the following decisions. Explain why, without some international agreement, they are likely to end up with neither country acting to protect the environment.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free