Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Is a monopolistically competitive firm productively efficient? Is it allocatively efficient? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified
In conclusion, a monopolistically competitive firm is neither productively efficient nor allocatively efficient in the long run. This is primarily due to product differentiation, which allows firms to charge higher prices and results in an inefficient allocation of resources.

Step by step solution

01

Characteristics of Monopolistic Competition

Monopolistic competition is a market structure where there are many firms producing differentiated products. These firms have some degree of market power, meaning they can set their own prices, albeit within a certain range due to competition. Some examples of monopolistically competitive markets include restaurants and clothing stores.
02

Productive Efficiency

Productive efficiency is achieved when a firm produces goods or services at the lowest possible cost. This occurs when the firm operates at the minimum point of its average total cost (ATC) curve. In the long run, a perfectly competitive firm is productively efficient because it can only continue to operate when producing at the lowest point of its ATC curve. If it were to produce where costs are higher, it would make a loss and eventually exit the market.
03

Allocative Efficiency

Allocative efficiency occurs when a market allocates resources in such a way that the mix of goods and services produced are most desired by consumers. In other words, allocative efficiency is achieved when the price consumers are willing to pay for a good or service (marginal benefit) equals the cost of producing an additional unit of that good or service (marginal cost). In a perfectly competitive market, allocative efficiency is achieved because the price is determined by the equilibrium between supply and demand, which makes the price equal to the marginal cost of production.
04

Monopolistically Competitive Firm and Productive Efficiency

In the short run, a monopolistically competitive firm can achieve productive efficiency. However, in the long run, monopolistically competitive firms will not achieve productive efficiency because they operate in a downward-sloping demand curve, and their average total cost curve is not at its minimum point. This is because product differentiation allows firms to charge slightly higher prices for their products, as they have some market power. The higher prices attract new firms to enter the market, and increased competition drives the price down. The process continues until profits are driven down to zero, and firms are left operating at a point higher up on their ATC curve, thus not achieving productive efficiency.
05

Monopolistically Competitive Firm and Allocative Efficiency

Monopolistically competitive firms are not allocatively efficient because the price they charge for their products is higher than the marginal cost of production. This is due to the downward-sloping demand curve, which arises from product differentiation. Since the price is higher than the marginal cost, the quantity produced is lower than the socially optimal level, resulting in deadweight loss. This deadweight loss represents the inefficiency in the allocation of resources. In conclusion, a monopolistically competitive firm is neither productively efficient nor allocatively efficient in the long run. This is primarily due to product differentiation, which allows firms to charge higher prices and results in an inefficient allocation of resources.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that, due to a successful advertising campaign, a monopolistic competitor experiences an increase in demand for its product. How will that affect the price it charges and the quantity it supplies?

When OPEC raised the price of oil dramatically in the mid-1970s, experts said it was unlikely that the cartel could stay together over the long term- -hat the incentives for individual members to cheat would become too strong. More than forty years later, OPEC still exists. Why do you think OPEC has been able to beat the odds and continue to collude? Hint: You may wish to consider non- economic reasons.

Jane and Bill are apprehended for a bank robbery. They are taken into separate rooms and questioned by the police about their involvement in the crime. The police tell them each that if they confess and turn the other person in, they will receive a lighter sentence. If they both confess, they will be each be sentenced to 30 years. If neither confesses, they will each receive a 20-year sentence. If only one confesses, the confessor will receive 15 years and the one who stayed silent will receive 35 years. Table 10.7 below represents the choices available to Jane and Bill. If Jane trusts Bill to stay silent, what should she do? If Jane thinks that Bill will confess, what should she do? Does Jane have a dominant strategy? Does Bill have a dominant strategy? \(\mathrm{A}=\) Confess; \(\mathrm{B}=\) Stay Silent. (Each results entry lists Jane's sentence first (in years), and Bill's sentence second.)

Mary and Raj are the only two growers who provide organically grown com to a local grocery store. They know that if they cooperated and produced less corn, they could raise the price of the com. If they work independently, they will each earn \(\$ 100 .\) If they decide to work together and both lower their output, they can each earn \(\$ 150 .\) If one person lowers output and the other does not, the person who lowers output will eam \(\$ 0\) and the other person will capture the entire market and will earn \(\$ 200\). Table 10.6 represents the choices available to Mary and Raj. What is the best choice for Raj if he is sure that Mary will cooperate? If Mary thinks Raj will cheat, what should Mary do and why? What is the prisoner's dilemma result? What is the preferred choice if they could ensure cooperation? \(A=\) Work independently; \(\mathrm{B}=\) Cooperate and Lower Output. (Each results entry lists Raj's eamings first, and Mary's earnings second.)

Will the firms in an oligopoly act more like a monopoly or more like competitors? Briefly explain.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free