Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Why do you think that the GATT rounds and,

more recently, WTO negotiations have become longer and more difficult to resolve?

Short Answer

Expert verified

This is because of the nature of both WTO and GATT.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Definition

GATT was a legal accord reducing barriers to international trade by reducing quotas, tariffs, subsidies. It intends to boost economic recovery.

WTO negotiations is a forum for various governments to arrange trade agreements and to settle or solve trade disputes.

02

Step 2. Explanation

First, we talk about GATTs. They are generally prohibiting the practice of quantitative limitation on imports and exports. It is a short-term consensus by the contracting parties.it has no legal enforcement potential. GATT has no reference to solving trade disputes.

On the other hand, WTO is a fixed agreement by contracting parties. With goods, WTO also includes services and solving trade disputes.

In both GATT and WTO negotiations have become hard to resolve because of their diminishing marginal returns. So if from the set of given rules if obvious policies have been already executed then it will become very difficult to resolve other remaining disputes.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In principle, the benefits of international trade to a

country exceed the costs, no matter whether the country is importing or exporting. In practice, it is not always possible to compensate the losers in a country, for example, workers who lose their jobs due to foreign imports. In your opinion, does that mean that trade should be inhibited to prevent losses?

The country of Pepperland exports steel to the Land of Submarines. Information for the quantity demanded (Qd) and quantity supplied (Qs) in each country, in a world without trade, are given in Table 21.6 and Table 21.7.

a. What would be the equilibrium price and quantity in each country in a world without trade? How can you tell?

b. What would be the equilibrium price and quantity in each country if trade is allowed to occur? How can you tell?

c. Sketch two supply and demand diagrams, one for each country, in the situation before trade.

d. On those diagrams, show the equilibrium price and the levels of exports and imports in the world after trade.

e. If the Land of Submarines imposes an antidumping import quota of 30, explain in general terms whether it will benefit or injure consumers and producers in each country.

f. Does your general answer change if the Land of Submarines imposes an import quota of 70?

What are the gains from competition?

An economic union requires giving up some

political autonomy to succeed. What are some examples of political power countries must give up to be members of an economic union?

How do trade barriers affect the average income level in an economy?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free