Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Which set of policies is more likely to cause a tradeoff between economic output and equality: policies of redistribution or policies aimed at the ladder of opportunity? Explain how the production possibility frontier tradeoff between economic equality and output might look in each case.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Policies of redistribution will cause a complete tradeoff and hence a downward sloping PPF.

Policies aimed at the ladder of opportunity would face a PPF which is more rising, then flat, and later falls.

Step by step solution

01

Step1. Introduction

In order to promote equality, two sets of policies are possible.

One is to aim at redistribution, i.e. redistribute the assets from rich to the poor.

Second is through the ladder of opportunity, i.e. by providing them with equal and ample number of opportunities to come out of the trap.

02

Step2. Explanation

Policies aiming at complete redistribution are the ones which shall face a trade off between whether to enhance economic output or to promote equality.

The PPF in such case between economic output and equality shall be strictly downward sloping.

In case of policies aiming at ladder of opportunity, the PPF will be more like an upward rising, followed by a flat phase and then strictly declining. Hence, through such policies we can if not increase the output, at least restrict it from falling.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What do you think is more important to focus on when considering inequality: income inequality or wealth inequality?

How can the effect of the poverty trap be reduced?

Imagine that the government reworks the welfare policy that was affecting Jonathan in question 1, so that for each dollar someone like Jonathan earns at work, his government benefits diminish by only 30 cents. Reconstruct the table from question 1 to account for this change in policy. Draw Jonathanโ€™s labor-leisure opportunity sets, both for before this welfare program is enacted and after it is enacted.

Susan is a single mother with three children. She can earn \(8 per hour and works up to 2,000 hours per year. However, if she does not earn any income at all, she will receive government benefits totaling \)16,000 per year. For every \(1 of income she earns, her level of government support will be reduced by \)1. Create a table, patterned after Table 15.8. The first column should show Susanโ€™s choices of how many hours to work per year, up to 2,000 hours. The second column should show her earnings from work. The third column should show her level of government support, given her earnings. The final column should show her total income, combining earnings and government support.

Many critics of government programs to help low-

income individuals argue that these programs create a poverty trap. Explain how programs such as TANF, EITC, SNAP, and Medicaid will affect low-income and whether or not you think these programs will benefit families and children.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free