Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Jane and Bill are apprehended for a bank robbery. They are taken into separate rooms and questioned by the police about their involvement in the crime. The police tell them each that if they confess and turn the other person in, they will receive a lighter sentence. If they both confess, they will be each be sentenced to 30years. If neither confesses, they will each receive a 20-year sentence. If only one confesses, the confessor will receive data-custom-editor="chemistry" 15years and the one who stayed silent will receive 35years. Table 10.7below represents the choices available to Jane and Bill. If Jane trusts Bill to stay silent, what should she do? If Jane thinks that Bill will confess, what should she do? Does Jane have a dominant strategy? Does Bill have a dominant strategy? A = Confess; B = Stay Silent. (Each results entry lists Jane’s sentence first (in years), and Bill's sentence second.)

Short Answer

Expert verified

Game theory is a mathematical method for distinct players compete with one other to make decisions.

Step by step solution

01

Definition

Dominant strategy refers to a situation in which one player picks a specific strategy regardless of what the other player decides.

02

Explanation

  • Jane will receive a 15-year sentence if she confesses and a 20-year term if she keeps silent if she trusts Bill to remain silent, thus she will choose to confess because it is the best alternative open to her given Bill's choice.
  • If Jane believes Bill will confess, she will face a 30-year sentence if she confesses and a 35-year sentence if she remains silent; therefore, Jane will choose to confess because it is the best alternative open to her given Bill's choice
  • If Bill chooses to confess, Jane's best option is to confess and receive a 30-year sentence; if Bill chooses to remain silent, Jane's best option is to confess and receive a 15-year sentence. This means that no matter what Bill chooses, Jane's best strategy is to confess, so Jane has the dominant strategy of confessing.
  • If Jane chooses to confess, the best option for Bill is to confess and receive a 30-year sentence; if Jane chooses to remain silent, the best option for Bill is to confess and receive a 15-year sentence, indicating that no matter what Jane chooses, the best strategy for Bill is to confess, indicating that Bill has the dominant strategy of confessing.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

When OPEC raised the price of oil dramatically in the mid-1970s, experts said it was unlikely that the cartel could stay together over the long term—that the incentives for individual members to cheat would become too strong. More than forty years later, OPEC still exists. Why do you think OPEC has been able to beat the odds and continue to collude? Hint: You may wish to consider non-economic reasons.

Mary and Raj are the only two growers who provide organically grown corn to a local grocery store. They know that if they cooperated and produced less corn, they could raise the price of the corn. If they work independently, they will each earn \(100. If they decide to work together and both lower their output, they can each earn \)150. If one person lowers output and the other does not, the person who lowers output will earn \(0and the other person will capture the entire market and will earn \)200. Table 10.6represents the choices available to Mary and Raj. What is the best choice for Raj if he is sure that Mary will cooperate? If Mary thinks Raj will cheat, what should Mary do and why? What is the prisoner’s dilemma result? What is the preferred choice if they could ensure cooperation? A = Work independently; B = Cooperate and Lower Output. (Each results entry lists Raj’s earnings first, and Mary's earnings second.)

RAJ MARY
(A) (B)
(\(100,\)100) (\(200,\)0)
(\(0,\)200) (\(150,\)150)

Would you expect the kinked demand curve to be more extreme (like a right angle) or less extreme (like a normal demand curve) if each firm in the cartel produces a near-identical product like OPEC and petroleum? What if each firm produces a somewhat different products? Explain your reasoning.

Make a case for why monopolistically competitive industries never reach long-run equilibrium.

Sometimes oligopolies in the same industry are very different in size. Suppose we have a duopoly where one firm

(Firm A) is large and the other firm (Firm B) is small, as the prisoner’s dilemma box in Table 10.4 shows.


Firm B colludes with firm AFirm B cheats by selling more output
Firm A colludes with firm B
A gets \(1000,B gets \)100A gets \(800, B gets \)200
Firm A cheats by selling more outputA gets \(1050, B gets\)50A gets \(500, B gets \)20

Assuming that both firms know the payoffs, what is the likely outcome in this case?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free