Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Would you rather have efficiency or variety? That is, one opportunity cost of the variety of products we have is that each product costs more per unit than if there were only one kind of product of a given type, like shoes. Perhaps a better question is, “What is the right amount of variety? Can there be too many varieties of shoes, for example?”

Short Answer

Expert verified
  • Finding the proper or ideal quantity of variation is quite challenging.
  • There can be too many varieties of shoes.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Introduction

Product differentiation is the process in which a product is made to stand out among its competitors by makign it slightly different than the others.

02

Step 2. Argument over the amount of variety

  • It is very difficult to find out the right or optimal amount of variety because monopolistic competition does not provide efficiency which this leads to the fact that product differentiation is based on variety and innovation and high degree of product differentiation costs more and produced goods become expensive. It is not clear that what amount of variety i.e. too less or too many variety benefits the consumer.
03

Example of the market which can have too many varieties of shoes

There can be too many varieties of shoes for example in Indian market some people like to buy shoes of high valued and highly advertised brands like Nike, Skechers, Reebok, Adidas etc. Some individuals are content with a smaller selection of differentiated products sold at a lesser price, such as shoes from local businesses.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Sometimes oligopolies in the same industry are very different in size. Suppose we have a duopoly where one firm

(Firm A) is large and the other firm (Firm B) is small, as the prisoner’s dilemma box in Table 10.4 shows.


Firm B colludes with firm AFirm B cheats by selling more output
Firm A colludes with firm B
A gets \(1000,B gets \)100A gets \(800, B gets \)200
Firm A cheats by selling more outputA gets \(1050, B gets\)50A gets \(500, B gets \)20

Assuming that both firms know the payoffs, what is the likely outcome in this case?

Continuing with the scenario in question 1, in the long run, the positive economic profits that the monopolistic competitor earns will attract a response either from existing firms in the industry or firms outside. As those firms capture the original firm’s profit, what will happen to the original firm’s profit-maximizing price and output levels?

If the firms in a monopolistically competitive market

are earning economic profits or losses in the short run, would you expect them to continue doing so in the long run? Why?

Will the firms in an oligopoly act more like a

monopoly or more like competitors? Briefly explain.

Jane and Bill are apprehended for a bank robbery. They are taken into separate rooms and questioned by the police about their involvement in the crime. The police tell them each that if they confess and turn the other person in, they will receive a lighter sentence. If they both confess, they will be each be sentenced to 30years. If neither confesses, they will each receive a 20-year sentence. If only one confesses, the confessor will receive data-custom-editor="chemistry" 15years and the one who stayed silent will receive 35years. Table 10.7below represents the choices available to Jane and Bill. If Jane trusts Bill to stay silent, what should she do? If Jane thinks that Bill will confess, what should she do? Does Jane have a dominant strategy? Does Bill have a dominant strategy? A = Confess; B = Stay Silent. (Each results entry lists Jane’s sentence first (in years), and Bill's sentence second.)

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free