Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Table 19.15 shows how the average costs of production for semiconductors (the “chips” in computer memories) change as the quantity of semiconductors built at that factory increases.

a. Based on these data, sketch a curve with quantity produced on the horizontal axis and average cost of production on the vertical axis. How does the curve illustrate economies of scale?

b. If the equilibrium quantity of semiconductors demanded is 90,000, can this economy take full advantage of economies of scale? What about if quantity demanded is 70,000 semiconductors 50,000 semiconductors? 30,000 semiconductors?

c. Explain how international trade could make it possible for even a small economy to take full advantage of economies of scale, while also benefiting from competition and the variety offered by several producers.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a.) As with the rise in the quantity, the average cost of production falls, this is signified by economies of scale.

b.) Till 40,000 the economies of scale can be used as the average cost of production is minimum from 40,000 to 1,00,000. At 30,000 it can not be benefitted.

c.) As international trade increases the demand, firms or even a small economy can increase the production and hence can make use of the economies of scale.

Step by step solution

01

Step1. Introduction 

Economies of scale refer to the concept that with rising production, the average cost of production falls up to a certain level.

02

Step2. Explanation 

a.

The curve above indicates the falling average cost of production with a rising quantity of production. This is exactly the phenomenon of Economies of Scale.

b.

From 4000 to 100000, the cost of production is assumed to be $2, which is the lowest, hence, economies of scale are taken advantage of.

At 30000, the cost is $3, which is not the lowest as by further expansion, it can be reduced to $2.

c. International trade increases the demand from all over the world, hence the aggregate demand rises. This allows firms of even a small economy to expand and take advantage of economies of scale.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Why might intra-industry trade seem surprising from the point of view of comparative advantage?

What factors does Paul Krugman identify that supported expanding international trade in the 1800s?

France and Tunisia both have Mediterranean climates that are excellent for producing/harvesting green beans and tomatoes. In France it takes two hours for each worker to harvest green beans and two hours to harvest a tomato. Tunisian workers need only one hour to harvest the tomatoes but four hours to harvest green beans. Assume there are only two workers, one in each country, and each works 40 hours a week.

a. Draw a production possibilities frontier for each country. Hint: Remember the production possibility frontier is the maximum that all workers can produce at a unit of time which, in this problem, is a week.

b. Identify which country has the absolute advantage in green beans and which country has the absolute advantage in tomatoes.

c. Identify which country has the comparative advantage.

d. How much would France have to give up in terms of tomatoes to gain from trade? How much would it have to give up in terms of green beans?

Why might intra-industry trade seem surprising from the point of view of comparative advantage?

In Japan, one worker can make 5 tons of rubber or 80 radios. In Malaysia, one worker can make 10 tons of rubber or 40 radios.

a. Who has the absolute advantage in the production of rubber or radios? How can you tell?

b. Calculate the opportunity cost of producing 80 additional radios in Japan and in Malaysia. (Your calculation may involve fractions, which is fine.) Which country has a comparative advantage in the production of radios?

c. Calculate the opportunity cost of producing 10 additional tons of rubber in Japan and in Malaysia. Which country has a comparative advantage in producing rubber?

d. In this example, does each country have an absolute advantage and a comparative advantage in the same good?

e. In what product should Japan specialize? In what product should Malaysia specialize?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free