Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In Japan, one worker can make 5 tons of rubber or 80 radios. In Malaysia, one worker can make 10 tons of rubber or 40 radios.

a. Who has the absolute advantage in the production of rubber or radios? How can you tell?

b. Calculate the opportunity cost of producing 80 additional radios in Japan and in Malaysia. (Your calculation may involve fractions, which is fine.) Which country has a comparative advantage in the production of radios?

c. Calculate the opportunity cost of producing 10 additional tons of rubber in Japan and in Malaysia. Which country has a comparative advantage in producing rubber?

d. In this example, does each country have an absolute advantage and a comparative advantage in the same good?

e. In what product should Japan specialize? In what product should Malaysia specialize?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. Japan- Radios, Malaysia- Rubber

b. Japan- 5, Malaysia- 20, Japan

c. Japan- 160, Malaysia- 40, Malaysia

d. Yes

e. Japan- Radios, Malaysia- Rubber

Step by step solution

01

Step1. Given information

The output table as given in the question is:


RubberRadios
Japan580
Malaysia1040
02

Step2. Absolute Advantage

a) According to Absolute Advantage theory, which country can produce more as compared to other countries given the same resources (in terms of labor hours) used.

Hence, Japan can produce more (80>40)Radios and Malaysia can produce more(10>5) Rubber. So, they have a respective absolute advantage over the other country.

03

Step3. b) Opportunity Cost table.

b) Following is the Opportunity cost table:



RubberRadios
Japan80/55/80
Malaysia40/1010/40

Opportunity cost for producing 80 radios:

Japan- 80*5/80=5units rubber

Malaysia= 80*10/40=20 units rubber

The lower the opportunity cost, the higher is a comparative advantage. Hence, Japan has a comparative advantage.

04

Step4. c) Opportunity Cost

c) From the above opportunity cost table,

the opportunity cost for producing 10 units of rubber:

Japan- 10*80/5=160

Malaysia- 10*40/10=40

Hence, Malaysia has a comparative advantage as it has lower opportunity costs than Japan.

05

Step5. Explanation

d) As from the above explanation, each country has a comparative and absolute advantage in the same good, i.e. Japan has Radios and Malaysia has rubbers.

06

Step6. Implication

e) It can hence be implied from the above calculation and explanation that Japan should specialize in Radio production and Malaysia should specialize in Rubber production.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Do consumers benefit from intra-industry trade

Review the numbers for Canada and Venezuela from Table 19.12 which describes how many barrels of oil and tons of lumber the workers can produce. Use these numbers to answer the rest of this question.

a. Draw a production possibilities frontier for each country. Assume there are 100 workers in each country. Canadians and Venezuelans desire both oil and lumber. Canadians want at least 2,000 tons of lumber. Mark a point on their production possibilities where they can get at least 3,000 tons.

b. Assume that the Canadians specialize completely because they figured out they have a comparative advantage in lumber. They are

willing to give up 1,000 tons of lumber. How much oil should they ask for in return for this lumber to be as well off as they were with no trade? How much should they ask for if they want to gain from trading with Venezuela? Note: We can think of this โ€œaskโ€ as the relative price or trade price of lumber.

c. Is the Canadian โ€œaskโ€ you identified in (b) also beneficial for Venezuelans? Use the production possibilities frontier graph for Venezuela to show that Venezuelans can gain from trade.

If trade increases world GDP by 1% per year, what is the global impact of this increase over 10 years? How does this increase compare to the annual GDP of a country like Sri Lanka? Discuss. Hint: To answer this question, here are steps you may want to consider. Go to the World Development Indicators (online) published by the World Bank. Find the current level of World GDP in constant international dollars. Also, find the GDP of Sri Lanka in constant international dollars. Once you have these two numbers, compute the amount the additional increase in global incomes due to trade and compare that number to Sri Lankaโ€™s GDP.

What is splitting up the value chain?

Are the gains from international trade more likely to be relatively more important to large or small countries?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free