Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In France it takes one worker to produce one sweater, and one worker to produce one bottle of wine. In Tunisia it takes two workers to produce one sweater, and three workers to produce one bottle of wine. Who has the absolute advantage in production of sweaters? Who has the absolute advantage in the production of wine? How can you tell?

Short Answer

Expert verified

It holds true because France can produce one sweater with less worker than Tunisia and one bottle of wine with less worker than Tunisia.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Introduction

Absolute advantage refers to the situation when a person, region, or organization is able to produce a good at a lower cost or produce higher quantity of good at the same cost.

02

Step 2. Reason why France has absolute advantage in production of wine.

Basically, when one worker is required to produce one sweater in France at the same time two workers is required to produce one sweater in Tunisia. It resulted that the France has 'absolute advantage' in the production of sweater as compare to Tunisia. Whereas, when one worker is required to produce one bottle of wine in France at the same time three workers is required to produce one bottle of wine in Tunisia. It resulted that the France has 'absolute advantage' in the production of wine.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What are the two main sources of economic gains from intra-industry trade?

Look at Exercise 33.2. Compute the opportunity costs of producing sweaters and wine in both France and Tunisia. Who has the lowest opportunity cost of producing sweaters and who has the lowest opportunity cost of producing wine? Explain what it means to have a lower opportunity cost.

Review the numbers for Canada and Venezuela from Table 19.12 which describes how many barrels of oil and tons of lumber the workers can produce. Use these numbers to answer the rest of this question.

a. Draw a production possibilities frontier for each country. Assume there are 100 workers in each country. Canadians and Venezuelans desire both oil and lumber. Canadians want at least 2,000 tons of lumber. Mark a point on their production possibilities where they can get at least 3,000 tons.

b. Assume that the Canadians specialize completely because they figured out they have a comparative advantage in lumber. They are

willing to give up 1,000 tons of lumber. How much oil should they ask for in return for this lumber to be as well off as they were with no trade? How much should they ask for if they want to gain from trading with Venezuela? Note: We can think of this โ€œaskโ€ as the relative price or trade price of lumber.

c. Is the Canadian โ€œaskโ€ you identified in (b) also beneficial for Venezuelans? Use the production possibilities frontier graph for Venezuela to show that Venezuelans can gain from trade.

True or False: The source of comparative advantage must be natural elements like climate and mineral deposits. Explain.

Look at Table 33.9. Is there a range of trades for which there will be no gains?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free