Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In the Land of Purity, there is only one form of pollution, called “gunk.” Table 12.14 shows possible combinations of economic output and reduction of gunk, depending on what kinds of environmental regulations you choose.

a. Sketch a graph of a production possibility frontier with environmental quality on the horizontal axis, measured by the percentage reduction of gunk, and with the quantity of economic output on the vertical axis.

b. Which choices display productive efficiency? How can you tell?

c. Which choices show allocative efficiency? How can you tell?

d. In the choice between K and L, can you say which one is better and why?

e. In the choice between K and N, can you say which one is better, and why?

f. If you had to guess, which choice would you think is more likely to represent a command-and- control environmental policy and which choice is more likely to represent a market-oriented environmental policy, choice L or M? Why?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a). The production choices can be shown graphically as follows:

b) On the PPP curve, every point reflects production efficiency. As a result, J, L, AND N are productively efficient.

c) Allocative efficiency is a subjective concept that is influenced by personal preferences. As a result, there is no way to determine allocating efficiency in this scenario because there are no provided preferences.

d) L is preferable because it displays higher economic production and higher environmental quality.

e) N will be superior since it demonstrates more productivity efficiency (all the points on PPP curves show production efficiency).

f) In this scenario, M stands for command and control environmental policy, which means less production, whereas L stands for market-oriented environmental policy, which means more production at no additional cost to the environment.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

Depending on the kind of environmental restrictions you adopt, the table illustrates different combinations of economic production and gunk reduction.

02

Content Introduction

The production possibilities curve (PPC) is a graph that shows all of the output combinations that are conceivable given current resources and technology. The production possibilities frontier (PPF), sometimes known as the PPC, displays scarcity and tradeoffs.

03

Explanation (part a)

The production choices can be shown graphically as follows:

04

Explanation (part b)

On the PPP curve, every point reflects production efficiency. As a result, J, L, AND N are productively efficient.

05

Explanation (part c)

Allocative efficiency is a subjective concept that is influenced by personal preferences. As a result, there is no way to determine allocating efficiency in this scenario because there are no provided preferences.

06

Explanation (part d)

L is the better option since it has a larger economic output and a better environmental quality.

07

Explanation (part e)

N will win because it has a higher productivity efficiency (all of the points on the PPP curves represent production efficiency).

08

Explanation (part f)

M stands for command and control environmental policy, which implies less output, whereas L stands for market-oriented environmental policy, which means more production at no additional environmental cost.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In a market without environmental regulations, will the supply curve for a firm account for private costs, external costs, both, or neither? Explain.

Consider the case of global environmental problems that spill across international borders as a prisoner’s dilemma of the sort studied in Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Say that there are two countries, A and B. Each country can choose whether to protect the environment, at a cost of 10, or not to protect it, at a cost of zero. If one country decides to protect the environment, there is a benefit of 16, but the benefit is divided equally between the two countries. If both countries decide to protect the environment, there is a benefit of 32, which is divided equally between the two countries.

a. In Table 12.10, fill in the costs, benefits, and total payoffs to the countries of the following decisions. Explain why, without some international agreement, they are likely to end up with neither country acting to protect the environment.

Suppose a city releases 16million gallons of raw sewage into a nearby lake. Table 12.8shows the total costs of cleaning up the sewage to different levels, together with the total benefits of doing so. (Benefits include environmental, recreational, health, and industrial benefits.)


Total Cost (in thousands of

dollars)


Total Benefits (in thousands of


dollars)


16 million

gallons


Current situation
Current situation

12 million

gallons


50800
8 million gallons
1501300
4 million gallons
5001650
0 gallons
12001900

a. Using the information in Table 12.8, calculate the marginal costs and marginal benefits of reducing sewage emissions for this city. See Production, Costs, and Industry Structure if you need a refresher on how to calculate marginal costs.

b. What is the optimal level of sewage for this city?

c. Why not just pass a law that firms can emit zero sewage? After all, the total benefits of zero-emissions exceed the total costs.

Refer to Table 12.2. The externality created by the refrigerator production was \(100. However, once we accounted for both the private and additional external costs, the market price increased by only \)50. If the external costs were \(100 why did the price only increase by \)50 when we accounted for all costs?

A country called Sherwood is very heavily covered with a forest of 50,000 trees. There are proposals

to clear some of Sherwood’s forest and grow corn, but obtaining this additional economic output will have an environmental cost from reducing the number of trees. Table 12.11 shows possible combinations of economic output and environmental protection.

a. Sketch a graph of a production possibility frontier with environmental quality on the horizontal axis, measured by the number of trees, and the quantity of economic output, measured in corn, on the vertical axis.

b. Which choices display productive efficiency? How can you tell?

c. Which choices show allocative efficiency? How can you tell?

d. In the choice between T and R, decide which one is better. Why?

e. In the choice between T and S, can you say which one is better, and why?

f. If you had to guess, which choice would you think is more likely to represent a command-and-control

environmental policy and which choice is more likely to represent a market-oriented environmental policy, choice Q or S? Why?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free