Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

How can high-income countries benefit from

covering much of the cost of reducing pollution created

by low-income countries?

Short Answer

Expert verified

For future generations, high-income countries will benefit from increased biodiversity and a cleaner environment.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

High income countries - The World Bank defines high-income nations as those with a GNP per capita of $9,266or more in 2000.

Low income countries - Low-income countries, according to the World Bank, are those with a per capita gross national income (GNI) of less than $1,026.

02

Explanation

Low-income countries must spend more on improving criteria such as health, education, industrial growth, and so on, therefore the pollution issue is overlooked because their primary focus is on economic development. High-income countries have already attained a minimal level of living, allowing them to develop while implementing pollution-control measures. Because global warming is an international issue that requires all nations to work together to address, if high-income countries financially assist low-income countries in implementing pollution control strategies, they will profit in terms of reduced pollution in the coming years.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show the market for cigarettes in equilibrium,

assuming that there are no laws banning smoking in

public. Label the equilibrium private market price and

quantity as Pm and Qm. Add whatever is needed to the

model to show the impact of the negative externality

from second-hand smoking. (Hint: In this case it is the

consumers, not the sellers, who are creating the negative

externality.) Label the social optimal output and price as

Pe and Qe. On the graph, shade in the deadweight loss at

the market output.

Suppose a city releases 16million gallons of raw sewage into a nearby lake. Table 12.8shows the total costs of cleaning up the sewage to different levels, together with the total benefits of doing so. (Benefits include environmental, recreational, health, and industrial benefits.)


Total Cost (in thousands of

dollars)


Total Benefits (in thousands of


dollars)


16 million

gallons


Current situation
Current situation

12 million

gallons


50800
8 million gallons
1501300
4 million gallons
5001650
0 gallons
12001900

a. Using the information in Table 12.8, calculate the marginal costs and marginal benefits of reducing sewage emissions for this city. See Production, Costs, and Industry Structure if you need a refresher on how to calculate marginal costs.

b. What is the optimal level of sewage for this city?

c. Why not just pass a law that firms can emit zero sewage? After all, the total benefits of zero-emissions exceed the total costs.

Give an example of a positive externality and an example of a negative externality.

In the tradeoff between economic output and environmental protection, what do the combinations on the protection possibility curve represent?

Identify whether the market supply curve will shift right or left or will stay the same for the following:

a. Firms in an industry are required to pay a fine for their carbon dioxide emissions.

b. Companies are sued for polluting the water in a river.

c. Power plants in a specific city are not required to address the impact of their air quality emissions.

d. Companies that use fracking to remove oil and gas from rock are required to clean up the damage.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free