Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Would environmentalists favor command-and-control policies as a way to reduce pollution? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Yes, Environmentalists favor command and control policies as laws are made under these policies are very effective.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

Policies that set pollution emission limitations and make it essential to use specified pollution management strategies are known as command and control policies.

02

Explanation

Environmentalists favor command and control policies as they were effective in protecting the environment and cleaning the air in U.S. in 1970. The EPA(Environment Protection Agency) was created within the same year to assess the laws and that they made CLEAN AIR ACT and CLEAN WATER ACT. These both acts of command and control policies with their amendments and updates are largely liable for clean air and water in U.S. of today.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Recycling is a relatively inexpensive solution to

much of the environmental contamination from plastics,

glass, and other waste materials. Is it a sound policy to

make it mandatory for everybody to recycle?

Classify the following pollution-control policies as command-and-control or market incentive-based.

a. A state emissions tax on the quantity of carbon emitted by each firm.

b. The federal government requires domestic auto companies to improve car emissions by 2020.

c. The EPA sets national standards for water quality.

d. A city sells permits to firms that allow them to emit a specified quantity of pollution.

e. The federal government pays fishermen to preserve salmon.

A country called Sherwood is very heavily covered with a forest of 50,000 trees. There are proposals

to clear some of Sherwoodโ€™s forest and grow corn, but obtaining this additional economic output will have an environmental cost from reducing the number of trees. Table 12.11 shows possible combinations of economic output and environmental protection.

a. Sketch a graph of a production possibility frontier with environmental quality on the horizontal axis, measured by the number of trees, and the quantity of economic output, measured in corn, on the vertical axis.

b. Which choices display productive efficiency? How can you tell?

c. Which choices show allocative efficiency? How can you tell?

d. In the choice between T and R, decide which one is better. Why?

e. In the choice between T and S, can you say which one is better, and why?

f. If you had to guess, which choice would you think is more likely to represent a command-and-control

environmental policy and which choice is more likely to represent a market-oriented environmental policy, choice Q or S? Why?

What is a pollution charge and what incentive does it provide for a firm to take external costs into account?

What is a marketable permit and what incentive does it provide for a firm to account for external costs?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free