Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The state of Colorado requires oil and gas companies who use fracking techniques to return the land to its original condition after the oil and gas extractions. Table 12.9shows the total cost and total benefits (in dollars) of this policy.

Table12.9

Land Restored (in acres)Total CostTotal Benefit
0\(0\)0
100\(20\)140
200\(80\)240
300\(160\)320
400\(280\)380

(a) Calculate the marginal cost and the marginal benefit at each quantity (acre) of land restored. See Production, Costs and Industry Structure if you need a refresher on how to calculate marginal costs and benefits.

b. If we apply marginal analysis, what is the optimal amount of land to be restored?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Land Restored (in acres)Marginal CostMarginal Benefit
0$0$0
100$0.2$1.4
200$0.6$1
300$0.8$0.8
400$1.2$0.6

If we apply marginal analysis, 300acres is the optimal amount of land to be restored.

Step by step solution

01

Formula of marginal cost and marginal benefit : 

MarginalCost(MC)=Changeintotalcost(dTC)Changeintotaloutput(dQ)MarginalBenefit(MB)=Changeintotalbenefit(dTB)Changeintotaloutput(dQ)

02

(a) Explanation : 

For 0acres land to be restored -

MC=dTCdQor,MC=00or,MC=0MB=dTBdQor,MB=00or,MB=0

For 100acres land to be restored -

MC=dTCdQor,MC=$20-$0100-0or,MC=$0.2MB=dTBdQor,MB=$140-$0100-0or,MB=$1.4

Foe 200acres land to be restored -

MC=dTCdQor,MC=$80-$20200-100or,MC=$0.6MB=dTBdQor,MB=$240-$140200-100or,MB=$1

For 300acres land to be restored -

MC=dTCdQor,MC=$160-$80300-200or,MC=$0.8MB=dTBdQor,MB=$320-$240300-200or,MB=$0.8

For 400acres land to be restored -

MC=dTCdQor,MC=$280-$160400-300or,MC=$1.2MB=dTBdQor,MB=$380-$320400-300or,MB=$0.6

03

(b) Explanation : 

It is the ideal level of land to be allocated when marginal cost = marginal benefit.

The optimal amount of land is 300acres, after which marginal revenue decreases.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show the market for cigarettes in equilibrium,

assuming that there are no laws banning smoking in

public. Label the equilibrium private market price and

quantity as Pm and Qm. Add whatever is needed to the

model to show the impact of the negative externality

from second-hand smoking. (Hint: In this case it is the

consumers, not the sellers, who are creating the negative

externality.) Label the social optimal output and price as

Pe and Qe. On the graph, shade in the deadweight loss at

the market output.

Four firms called Elm, Maple, Oak, and Cherry, produce wooden chairs. However, they also produce a great deal of garbage (a mixture of glue, varnish, sandpaper, and wood scraps). The first row of Table 12.6shows the total amount of garbage (in tons) that each firm currently produces. The other rows of the table show the cost of reducing garbage produced by the first five tons, the second five tons, and so on. First, calculate the cost of requiring each firm to reduce the weight of its garbage by one-fourth. Now, imagine that the government issues marketable permits for the current level of garbage, but the permits will shrink the weight of allowable garbage for each firm by one-fourth.

What will be the result of this alternative approach to reducing pollution?


Elm
Maple
Oak
Cherry
Current production of garbage (in tons)
20406080
Cost of reducing garbage by first five tons
\(5,500
\)6,300
\(7,200
\)3,000
Cost of reducing garbage by second five tons
\(6,000
\)7,200
\(7,500
\)4,000
Cost of reducing garbage by third five tons
\(6,500
\)8,100
\(7,800
\)5,000
Cost of reducing garbage by third five tons
\(7,000
\)9,000
\(8,100
\)6,000
Cost of reducing garbage by fifth five tons
\(0
\)9,900
\(8,400
\)7,000

What is an externality?

Table 12.12, shows the supply and demand conditions for a firm that will play trumpets on the streets when requested. QS1 is the quantity supplied without social costs. QS2 is the quantity supplied with social costs. What is the negative externality in this situation? Identify the equilibrium price and quantity when we account only for private costs, and then when we account for social costs. How does accounting for the externality affect the equilibrium price and quantity?

Table 12.5 provides the supply and demand conditions for a manufacturing firm. The third column represents a supply curve without accounting for the social cost of pollution. The fourth column represents the supply curve when the firm is required to account for the social cost of pollution. Identify the equilibrium before the social cost of production is included and after the social cost of production is included.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free