Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose a city releases 16million gallons of raw sewage into a nearby lake. Table 12.8shows the total costs of cleaning up the sewage to different levels, together with the total benefits of doing so. (Benefits include environmental, recreational, health, and industrial benefits.)


Total Cost (in thousands of

dollars)


Total Benefits (in thousands of


dollars)


16 million

gallons


Current situation
Current situation

12 million

gallons


50800
8 million gallons
1501300
4 million gallons
5001650
0 gallons
12001900

a. Using the information in Table 12.8, calculate the marginal costs and marginal benefits of reducing sewage emissions for this city. See Production, Costs, and Industry Structure if you need a refresher on how to calculate marginal costs.

b. What is the optimal level of sewage for this city?

c. Why not just pass a law that firms can emit zero sewage? After all, the total benefits of zero-emissions exceed the total costs.

Short Answer

Expert verified

In all the parts there is a use of marginal cost and marginal benefits which is given below.

Step by step solution

01

Marginal cost : 

It is the expense incurred as a result of using an additional unit of input.

02

(a) Explanation : 

Marginal cost and Marginal benefit are calculated.

03

(b) Explanation : 

The optimal level is one in which the marginal cost equals the marginal benefit (MC=MB). As a result, 4million gallons of sewage is the optimal amount.

04

(c) Explanation : 

As seen in the chart above, zero sewage levels are not attainable; also, if more than 4mg is tried, MC>MR occurs, increasing costs; thus, it is preferable to put these resources to more productive use.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What arguments do low-income countries make in international discussions of global environmental clean-up

Identify whether the market supply curve will shift right or left or will stay the same for the following:

a. Firms in an industry are required to pay a fine for their carbon dioxide emissions.

b. Companies are sued for polluting the water in a river.

c. Power plants in a specific city are not required to address the impact of their air quality emissions.

d. Companies that use fracking to remove oil and gas from rock are required to clean up the damage.

Can extreme levels of pollution hurt the economic

development of a high-income country? Why or why

not?

Table 12.12, shows the supply and demand conditions for a firm that will play trumpets on the streets when requested. QS1 is the quantity supplied without social costs. QS2 is the quantity supplied with social costs. What is the negative externality in this situation? Identify the equilibrium price and quantity when we account only for private costs, and then when we account for social costs. How does accounting for the externality affect the equilibrium price and quantity?

Consider the case of global environmental problems that spill across international borders as a prisoner’s dilemma of the sort studied in Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Say that there are two countries, A and B. Each country can choose whether to protect the environment, at a cost of 10, or not to protect it, at a cost of zero. If one country decides to protect the environment, there is a benefit of 16, but the benefit is divided equally between the two countries. If both countries decide to protect the environment, there is a benefit of 32, which is divided equally between the two countries.

a. In Table 12.10, fill in the costs, benefits, and total payoffs to the countries of the following decisions. Explain why, without some international agreement, they are likely to end up with neither country acting to protect the environment.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free