Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Why does a change in income cause a parallel shift in the budget constraint?

Short Answer

Expert verified
A change in income causes a parallel shift in the budget constraint because the prices of the goods remain constant, and only the consumer's ability to purchase the goods changes. The trade-off between the goods does not change, resulting in parallel lines with the same slope representing the new budget constraints.

Step by step solution

01

1. Understanding the Budget Constraint

: A budget constraint represents all the combinations of goods that a consumer can purchase with a given level of income and prices for goods. Mathematically, the budget constraint equation is given by: \(I = p_x X + p_y Y\) Where: - I is the consumer's income - \(p_x\) is the price of good X - \(p_y\) is the price of good Y - X and Y are the quantities of goods X and Y, respectively. The budget constraint line is the graphical representation of this equation on a two-dimensional plane, with the quantity of good X on the x-axis and the quantity of good Y on the y-axis.
02

2. Changes in Income

: When the consumer's income changes, the budget constraint line will shift. If the income increases, the budget constraint line will shift outward (away from the origin). Conversely, if the income decreases, the budget constraint line will shift inward (toward the origin). To understand this, consider the case when there is an increase in income. Let's denote the new income as \(I'\). The new budget constraint equation would be: \(I' = p_x X + p_y Y\)
03

3. The Parallel Shift in the Budget Constraint Line

: Now, let's compare the original budget constraint equation (\(I = p_x X + p_y Y\)) to the new budget constraint equation with increased income (\(I' = p_x X + p_y Y\)). Notice that the prices of the goods (i.e., \(p_x\) and \(p_y\)) have not changed in the new budget constraint equation. This means that the slope of the new budget constraint line will remain the same. The slope of the budget constraint line is given by the negative price ratio: \(- \frac{p_x}{p_y}\) Since the slope remains the same for both the original and new budget constraint lines, they will be parallel to each other. This applies to both an increase and a decrease in income.
04

4. Reasoning

: The reason behind the parallel shift lies in the fact that a change in income does not affect the prices of goods X and Y. When income changes, the consumer's ability to purchase the goods changes as well. However, the relative prices of the goods remain constant, and thus, the trade-off between the goods does not change. This results in the budget constraint line shifting parallel to the initial line. In conclusion, a change in income causes a parallel shift in the budget constraint because the prices of the goods remain constant, and only the consumer's ability to purchase the goods changes. The trade-off between the goods does not change, resulting in parallel lines with the same slope representing the new budget constraints.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Praxilla, who lived in ancient Greece, derives utility from reading poems and from eating cucumbers. Praxilla gets 30 units of marginal utility from her first poem, 27 units of marginal utility from her second poem, 24 units of marginal utility from her third poem, and so on, with marginal utility declining by three units for each additional poem. Praxilla gets six units of marginal utility for each of her first three cucumbers consumed, five units of marginal utility for each of her next three cucumbers consumed, four units of marginal utility for each of the following three cucumbers consumed, and so on, with marginal utility declining by one for every three cucumbers consumed. A poem costs three bronze coins but a cucumber costs only one bronze coin. Praxilla has 18 bronze coins. Sketch Praxilla's budget set between poems and cucumbers, placing poems on the vertical axis and cucumbers on the horizontal axis. Start off with the choice of zero poems and 18 cucumbers, and calculate the changes in marginal utility of moving along the budget line to the next choice of one poem and 15 cucumbers. Using this step-bystep process based on marginal utility, create a table and identify Praxilla's utility-maximizing choice. Compare the marginal utility of the two goods and the relative prices at the optimal choice to see if the expected relationship holds. Hint: Label the table columns: 1) Choice, 2) Marginal Gain from More Poems, 3) Marginal Loss from Fewer Cucumbers, 4) Overall Gain or Loss, 5) Is the previous choice optimal? Label the table rows: 1) 0 Poems and 18 Cucumbers, 2) 1 Poem and 15 Cucumbers, 3 ) 2 Poems and 12 Cucumbers, 4 ) 3 Poems and 9 Cucumbers, 5 ) 4 Poems and 6 Cucumbers, 6) 5 Poems and 3 Cucumbers, 7 ) 6 Poems and 0 Cucumbers.

Would you expect marginal utility to rise or fall with additional consumption of a good? Why?

As a general rule, is it safe to assume that a change in the price of a good will always have its most significant impact on the quantity demanded of that good, rather than on the quantity demanded of other goods? Explain.

The rules of politics are not always the same as the rules of economics. In discussions of setting budgets for government agencies, there is a strategy called "closing the Washington Monument." When an agency faces the unwelcome prospect of a budget cut, it may decide to close a high-visibility attraction enjoyed by many people (like the Washington Monument). Explain in terms of diminishing marginal utility why the Washington Monument strategy is so misleading. Hint: If you are really trying to make the best of a budget cut, should you cut the items in your budget with the highest marginal utility or the lowest marginal utility? Does the Washington Monument strategy cut the items with the highest marginal utility or the lowest marginal utility?

What is the rule relating the ratio of marginal utility to prices of two goods at the optimal choice? Explain why, if this rule does not hold, the choice cannot be utility-maximizing.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free