Chapter 34: Problem 31
What is the national interest argument for protectionism with regard to certain products?
Chapter 34: Problem 31
What is the national interest argument for protectionism with regard to certain products?
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeAssume two countries, Thailand (T) and Japan (J), have one good: cameras. The demand (d) and supply (s) for cameras in Thailand and Japan is described by the following functions: $$\begin{array}{l} \mathrm{Qd}^{\mathrm{T}}=60-\mathrm{P} \\ \mathrm{Qd}^{\mathrm{J}}=80-\mathrm{P} \end{array}$$ $$\begin{aligned} &\mathrm{Qs}^{\mathrm{T}}=-5+\frac{1}{4} \mathrm{P}\\\ &\mathrm{Qs}^{\mathrm{J}}=-10+\frac{1}{2} \mathrm{P} \end{aligned}$$ P is the price measured in a common currency used in both countries, such as the Thai Baht. a. Compute the equilibrium price (P) and quantities (Q) in each country without trade. b. Now assume that free trade occurs. The free trade price goes to 56.36 Baht. Who exports and imports cameras and in what quantities?
Why is trade a good thing if some people lose?
Trade has income distribution effects. For example, suppose that because of a government-negotiated reduction in trade barriers, trade between Germany and the Czech Republic increases. Germany sells house paint to the Czech Republic. The Czech Republic sells alarm clocks to Germany. Would you expect this pattern of trade to increase or decrease jobs and wages in the paint industry in Germany? The alarm clock industry in Germany? The paint industry in Czech Republic? The alarm clock industry in Czech Republic? What has to happen for there to be no increase in total unemployment in both countries?
How does competition, whether domestic or foreign, harm businesses?
How do trade barriers affect the average income level in an economy?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.