Chapter 11: Problem 20
If public utilities are a natural monopoly, what would be the danger in deregulating them?
Chapter 11: Problem 20
If public utilities are a natural monopoly, what would be the danger in deregulating them?
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeIs it true that the four-firm concentration ratio puts more emphasis on one or two very large firms, while the Herfindahl-Hirshman Index puts more emphasis on all the firms in the entire market? Explain briefly.
Deregulation, like all changes in government policy, always has pluses and minuses. What do you think some of the minuses might be for airline deregulation?
Why does regulatory capture reduce the persuasiveness of the case for regulating industries for the benefit of consumers?
How do we measure a four-firm concentration ratio? What does a high measure mean about the extent of competition?
Use the following information to answer the next three questions. In the years before wireless phones, when telephone technology required having a wire running to every home, it seemed plausible that telephone service had diminishing average costs and might require regulation like a natural monopoly. For most of the twentieth century, the national U.S. phone company was AT\&T, and the company functioned as a regulated monopoly. Think about the deregulation of the U.S. telecommunications industry that has occurred over the last few decades. (This is not a research assignment, but a thought assignment based on what you have learned in this chapter.) What real world changes made the deregulation possible?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.