Chapter 10: Problem 1
Suppose that, due to a successful advertising campaign, a monopolistic competitor experiences an increase in demand for its product. How will that affect the price it charges and the quantity it supplies?
Chapter 10: Problem 1
Suppose that, due to a successful advertising campaign, a monopolistic competitor experiences an increase in demand for its product. How will that affect the price it charges and the quantity it supplies?
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeSometimes oligopolies in the same industry are very different in size. Suppose we have a duopoly where one firm (Firm A) is large and the other firm (Firm B) is small, as the prisoner's dilemma box in Table 10.4 shows. $$\begin{array}{l|l|l}\hline & \begin{array}{l}\text { Firm B colludes with Firm } \\\\\text { A }\end{array} & \begin{array}{l}\text { Firm B cheats by selling more } \\\\\text { output }\end{array} \\\\\hline \text { Firm A colludes with Firm B } & \begin{array}{l}\text { A gets } \$ 1,000, \text { B gets } \\\\\$ 100\end{array} & \text { A gets \$800, B gets \$200 } \\\\\hline \begin{array}{l}\text { Firm A cheats by selling more } \\ \text { output }\end{array} & \begin{array}{l}\text { A gets \$1,050, B gets } \\\\\$ 50\end{array} & \text { A gets \$500, B gets \$20 } \\\\\hline\end{array}$$ Assuming that both firms know the payoffs, what is the likely outcome in this case?
Will the firms in an oligopoly act more like a monopoly or more like competitors? Briefly explain.
Continuing with the scenario in question \(1,\) in the long run, the positive economic profits that the monopolistic competitor earns will attract a response either from existing firms in the industry or firms outside. As those firms capture the original firm's profit, what will happen to the original firm's profit-maximizing price and output levels?
Does each individual in a prisoner's dilemma benefit more from cooperation or from pursuing self-interest? Explain briefly.
When OPEC raised the price of oil dramatically in the mid-1970s, experts said it was unlikely that the cartel could stay together over the long term-that the incentives for individual members to cheat would become too strong. More than forty years later, OPEC still exists. Why do you think OPEC has been able to beat the odds and continue to collude? Hint: You may wish to consider non- economic reasons.
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.